World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicole D. Anderson

Nicole D. Anderson

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
25071
World Ranking
7064
National Ranking
478

Nicole D. Anderson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicole D. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nicole D. Anderson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicole D. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Nicole D. Anderson is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has a research focus largely centered within the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience. Their scholarly output spans areas including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and Physiology.

Their research covers a range of specific topics, notably:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Diet and Metabolism Studies
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Nicole D. Anderson has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in these journals:

  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Derrida Today
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Notable recent papers include:

  • Inhibitory Control Deficits in Individuals with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: a Meta-Analysis, 2020, Neuropsychology Review
  • The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Diet and Exercise Effects on Cognition: A Review of the Intervention Literature, 2022, The Journals of Gerontology Series A
  • When I'm 64: Age-Related Variability in Over 40,000 Online Cognitive Test Takers, 2021, The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Household Physical Activity is Positively Associated with Gray Matter Volume in Older Adults, 2021, BMC Geriatrics
  • Sex Differences in the Relationship Between Dietary Pattern Adherence and Cognitive Function Among Older Adults: Findings from the NuAge Study, 2020, Nutrition Journal

Frequent collaborators on their work include:

  • Sylvie Belleville
  • Guylaine Ferland
  • Claude Alain
  • Howard Feldman
  • Manuel Montero-Odasso

In 2016, Nicole D. Anderson was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Mindfulness : A proposed operational definition

    Scott R. Bishop;Mark Lau;Shauna Shapiro;Linda E Carlson

  • Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults.

    Roberto Cabeza;Nicole D. Anderson;Jill K. Locantore;Anthony R. McIntosh

  • The toronto mindfulness scale: Development and validation

    Mark A. Lau;Scott R. Bishop;Zindel V. Segal;Tom Buis

  • The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory

    Fergus I. M. Craik;Richard Govoni;Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Nicole D. Anderson

  • The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology

    Paul W. Burgess;Nick Alderman;Catrin Forbes;Angela Costello

  • Mindfulness‐based stress reduction and attentional control

    Nicole D. Anderson;Mark A. Lau;Mark A. Lau;Zindel V. Segal;Zindel V. Segal;Scott R. Bishop;Scott R. Bishop

  • The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.

    Nicole D. Anderson;Fergus I. M. Craik;Moshe Naveh-Benjamin

  • The benefits associated with volunteering among seniors: : A critical review and recommendations for future research

    Nicole D. Anderson;Thecla Damianakis;Edeltraut Kröger;Laura M. Wagner

  • State of the science on mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

    Nicole D Anderson

  • Age-Related Differences in Neural Activity during Item and Temporal-Order Memory Retrieval: A Positron Emission Tomography Study

    Roberto Cabeza;Nicole D. Anderson;Sylvain Houle;Jennifer A. Mangels

  • The Effects of Divided Attention on Encoding- and Retrieval-Related Brain Activity: A PET Study of Younger and Older Adults

    Nicole D. Anderson;Tetsuya Iidaka;Roberto Cabeza;Shitij Kapur

  • Intensive Methotrexate and Cytarabine Followed by High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem-Cell Rescue in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma: An Intent-to-Treat Analysis

    Lauren E. Abrey;Craig H. Moskowitz;Warren P. Mason;Michael Crump

  • Memory in the aging brain

    Nicole D. Anderson;Fergus I. M. Craik

  • Changing everyday memory behaviour in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomised controlled trial.

    Angela K Troyer;Kelly J Murphy;Nicole D Anderson;Morris Moscovitch

  • Lateralization of Prefrontal Activity during Episodic Memory Retrieval: Evidence for the Production-Monitoring Hypothesis

    Roberto Cabeza;Jill K. Locantore;Nicole D. Anderson

  • Recollection- and familiarity-based memory in healthy aging and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

    Nicole D. Anderson;Patricia L. Ebert;Janine M. Jennings;Cheryl L. Grady

  • The Effect of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval in Episodic Memory Revealed by Positron Emission Tomography

    Tetsuya Iidaka;Nicole D. Anderson;Shitij Kapur;Roberto Cabeza

  • A consensus-based transparency checklist

    Balazs Aczel;Barnabas Szaszi;Alexandra Sarafoglou;Zoltan Kekecs

  • Further Development of the Multiple Errands Test: Standardized Scoring, Reliability, and Ecological Validity for the Baycrest Version

    Deirdre R. Dawson;Nicole D. Anderson;Paul Burgess;Erin Cooper

  • Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Fergus I. M. Craik;Dana Gavrilescu;Nicole D. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Deirdre R. Dawson
Deirdre R. Dawson University of Toronto
Fergus I. M. Craik
Fergus I. M. Craik University of Toronto
Bradley J. MacIntosh
Bradley J. MacIntosh Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Malcolm A. Binns
Malcolm A. Binns University of Toronto
Sylvie Belleville
Sylvie Belleville University of Montreal
Roberto Cabeza
Roberto Cabeza Duke University
Donald T. Stuss
Donald T. Stuss University of Toronto
Elizabeth Rochon
Elizabeth Rochon University of Toronto
Angela K. Troyer
Angela K. Troyer University of Toronto
Cheryl L. Grady
Cheryl L. Grady University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology offers a wide range of online degree options across the USA. Many accredited institutions now provide flexible online programs, making it more accessible for students to pursue their interests within the field. Whether you are interested in counseling, clinical work, or research, online psychology degrees can be tailored to various career pathways.

Students can select programs based on geographic preference, course format, or specialization. For example, if you live on the west coast, you might consider online psychology programs in San Diego. In the south, aspiring professionals might look into the best online psychology program rankings in Texas to identify top schools. Wisconsin also offers noteworthy options—browse online psychology degrees in Wisconsin for programs specific to that area.

For those seeking a nationwide overview, the best online psychology program rankings in USA can help compare schools across different states, specializations, and formats. No matter where you choose to study, an online psychology degree can open doors to careers in education, healthcare, business, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Nicole D. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles