World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
52
Citations
10031
World Ranking
3636
National Ranking
195

Mark Cassidy publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Cassidy sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 376 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Mark Cassidy D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Cassidy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Cassidy is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on engineering disciplines, with an emphasis on civil and structural engineering.

Their work spans multiple subfields, including:

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials

The main areas of study for Cassidy include topics related to geotechnical engineering, soil mechanics, and energy systems. These cover:

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
  • Wave and Wind Energy Systems
  • Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics

Recent publications by Cassidy highlight a range of research subjects and venues. Selected papers include:

  • Observations of the Effects of a Clay Layer on Suction Bucket Installation in Sand, 2020, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Review and Applications in Geotechnics and Geosciences, 2025, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
  • Modeling of large deformation problem considering spatially variable soils in offshore engineering, 2020, Marine Georesources and Geotechnology
  • Capacity of Caissons in Dense Sand under Combined Loading, 2020, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Upscaling of Co-Impregnated La0.20Sr0.25Ca0.45TiO3 Anodes for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: A Progress Report on a Decade of Academic-Industrial Collaboration, 2021, Advanced Energy Materials

Cassidy has frequently collaborated with several researchers over their career. Notable coauthors include:

  • Yinghui Tian
  • Britta Bienen
  • Conleth O'Loughlin
  • Shiao Huey Chow
  • John T. S. Irvine

Their publications appear consistently in several key academic venues, reflecting the breadth of their research interests. These venues include:

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Computers and Geotechnics
  • Géotechnique
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Challenges of offshore geotechnical engineering

    Mark Randolph;Mark Cassidy;Susan Gourvenec;Carl Erbrich

  • Recent advances in offshore geotechnics for deep water oil and gas developments

    Mark F. Randolph;Christophe Gaudin;Susan M. Gourvenec;David J. White

  • Tailoring SOFC Electrode Microstructures for Improved Performance

    Paul A. Connor;Xiangling Yue;Cristian D. Savaniu;Robert Price

  • SOFC technology development at Rolls-Royce

    F.J Gardner;M.J Day;N.P Brandon;M.N Pashley

  • A plasticity model for the behaviour of footings on sand under combined loading

    G.T. Houlsby;Mark Cassidy

  • Advanced Electrochemical Properties of LnBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5 + δ (Ln = Pr , Sm, and Gd) as Cathode Materials for IT-SOFC

    Jung Hyun Kim;Mark Cassidy;John T.S. Irvine;Joongmyeon Bae

  • Failure Mechanism and Bearing Capacity of Footings Buried at Various Depths in Spatially Random Soil

    Jinhui Li;Yinghui Tian;Mark Jason Cassidy

  • Influence of padeye offset on bearing capacity of three-dimensional plate anchors

    Yinghui Tian;Christophe Gaudin;Mark F. Randolph;Mark J. Cassidy

  • Investigating six-degree-of-freedom loading of shallow foundations on sand

    Britta Bienen;B.W. Byrne;G.T. Houlsby;Mark Cassidy

  • Simplified quantitative risk assessment of rainfall-induced landslides modelled by infinite slopes

    Abid Ali;Jinsong Huang;A.V. Lyamin;S.W. Sloan

  • Electrochemical Investigation of Composite Cathodes with SmBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ Cathodes for Intermediate Temperature-Operating Solid Oxide Fuel Cell†

    Jung Hyun Kim;Mark Cassidy;John T.S. Irvine;Joongmyeon Bae

  • The undrained bearing capacity of a spudcan foundation under combined loading in soft clay

    Youhu Zhang;Britta Bienen;Mark J. Cassidy;Susan Gourvenec

  • Revealing the bearing capacity mechanisms of a penetrating spudcan through sand overlying clay

    K.L. Teh;Mark Cassidy;C.F. Leung;Y.K. Chow

  • Analysis of jack-up units using a Constrained NewWave methodology

    Mark Cassidy;R. Eatock Taylor;G.T. Houlsby

  • A comparison of the combined load behaviour of spudcan and caisson foundations on soft normally consolidated clay

    Mark Cassidy;B.W. Byrne;Mark Randolph

  • Probabilistic combined loading failure envelopes of a strip footing on spatially variable soil

    Mark J. Cassidy;Marco Uzielli;Yinghui Tian

  • Predicting the resistance profile of a spudcan penetrating sand overlying clay

    Pan Hu;Dong Wang;Mark J. Cassidy;Sam A. Stanier

  • Bearing capacity on sand overlying clay soils: experimental and finite-element investigation of potential punch-through failure

    K.K. Lee;Mark Cassidy;Mark Randolph

  • Numerical modelling of a hybrid skirted foundation under combined loading

    Britta Bienen;Christophe Gaudin;Mark Jason Cassidy;Ludger Rausch

  • A plasticity model to assess the keying of plate anchors

    Mark Cassidy;Christophe Gaudin;Mark Randolph;P.C. Wong

Frequent Co-Authors

John T. S. Irvine
John T. S. Irvine University of St Andrews
Mark Randolph
Mark Randolph University of Western Australia
Conleth O'Loughlin
Conleth O'Loughlin University of Western Australia
Susan Gourvenec
Susan Gourvenec University of Southampton
Guy T. Houlsby
Guy T. Houlsby University of Oxford
Andrei V. Lyamin
Andrei V. Lyamin University of Newcastle Australia
Jinsong Huang
Jinsong Huang University of Newcastle Australia
Scott W. Sloan
Scott W. Sloan University of Newcastle Australia
Byron W. Byrne
Byron W. Byrne University of Oxford
Nigel P. Brandon
Nigel P. Brandon Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Engineering and Technology doesn’t have to follow a single path. Today, many students are exploring specialized online degrees that open up dynamic and well-paid roles. For those interested in overseeing complex technical projects, enrolling in a project management degree online can offer flexibility and strong leadership skills, paving the way for advancement across industries.

Another fast-growing field is UX/UI design. If you’re passionate about improving digital experiences, an online ux design degree provides practical training and the creative edge needed to work with product teams or tech startups.

The real estate sector is also increasingly technology-driven. Earning a real estate degree online can prepare you for roles in property management, appraisal, or urban planning—all fields enhanced by strong engineering and tech insights.

If you’re considering which pathway to choose, it may help to explore trends such as project management degree salary outlooks, which highlight the earning potential and job growth within these varied domains.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Cassidy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles