World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mauro Giacomini

Mauro Giacomini

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 51 2596 2371 145 137 272 10055

Mauro Giacomini publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mauro Giacomini between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mauro Giacomini published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2024. 46 of the 433 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2024. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 20 publications
1990 2025

433 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mauro Giacomini: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 4
1992 5
1993 7
1994 7
1995 3
1996 15
1997 9
1998 6
1999 13
2000 11
2001 8
2002 9
2003 8
2004 7
2005 10
2006 11
2007 16
2008 8
2009 21
2010 6
2011 7
2012 9
2013 14
2014 20
2015 23
2016 15
2017 19
2018 10
2019 15
2020 22
2021 12
2022 19
2023 16
2024 26
2025 20
Total 433
Download as CSV

Mauro Giacomini publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mauro Giacomini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 264–273 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 272 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138 272
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mauro Giacomini D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mauro Giacomini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166 51
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mauro Giacomini is affiliated with McMaster University in Canada and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work spans several subfields, including Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Neurology, and Health Information Management.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing, Electronic Health Records Systems, and Antibiotic Use and Resistance.

Recent publications by Mauro Giacomini include the following papers:

  • "Tocilizumab and steroid treatment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia" (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • "Clinical characteristics, management and in-hospital mortality of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Genoa, Italy" (2020, Clinical Microbiology and Infection)
  • "Early Detection of Sepsis With Machine Learning Techniques: A Brief Clinical Perspective" (2021, Frontiers in Medicine)
  • "Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in intensive care units: a multicenter study by ESGCIP and EFISG" (2023, Critical Care)
  • "Mortality in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: a changing landscape" (2023, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy)

The scientist frequently publishes in venues including:

  • Studies in health technology and informatics
  • Journal of Personalized Medicine
  • Frontiers in Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases and Therapy
  • Annals of Medicine

Mauro Giacomini collaborates regularly with several researchers, including Sara Mora, Matteo Bassetti, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Antonio Di Biagio, and Antonio Vena, with whom they have coauthored numerous papers.

Best Publications

  • Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXIII. Qualitative Research in Health Care A. Are the Results of the Study Valid?

    Mita K. Giacomini;Deborah J. Cook

  • Users' Guides to the Medical Literature XXIII. Qualitative Research in Health Care B. What Are the Results and How Do They Help Me Care for My Patients?

    Mita K. Giacomini;Deborah J. Cook

  • Patient experiences of depression and anxiety with chronic disease: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

    D DeJean;M Giacomini;M Vanstone;F Brundisini

  • Chronic disease patients' experiences with accessing health care in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

    F Brundisini;M Giacomini;D DeJean;M Vanstone

  • Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice.

    Julia Abelson;Mita Giacomini;Pascale Lehoux;Francois-Pierre Gauvin

  • Alterations of lung and chest wall mechanics in patients with acute lung injury: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure.

    P Pelosi;M Cereda;G Foti;M Giacomini

  • Facilitating clinician adherence to guidelines in the intensive care unit: A multicenter, qualitative study.

    Tasnim Sinuff;Deborah Cook;Mita Giacomini;Daren Heyland

  • Type 2 diabetes patients’ and providers’ differing perspectives on medication nonadherence: a qualitative meta-synthesis

    Francesca Brundisini;Meredith Vanstone;Danielle Hulan;Deirdre DeJean

  • Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study.

    Peter A Singer;Douglas K Martin;Mita Giacomini;Laura Purdy

  • Experiences of Living and Dying With COPD: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of the Qualitative Empirical Literature

    M Giacomini;D DeJean;D Simeonov;A Smith

  • Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers.

    Douglas K Martin;Mita Giacomini;Peter A Singer

  • Gender and Ethnic Differences in Hospital-Based Procedure Utilization in California

    Mita K. Giacomini

  • "It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies.

    Francois-Pierre Gauvin;Julia Abelson;Mita Giacomini;John Eyles

  • Tailoring biomaterial compatibility: in vivo tissue response versus in vitro cell behavior.

    Monica Mattioli-Belmonte;G. Giavaresi;G. Biagini;L. Virgili

  • A change of heart and a change of mind? Technology and the redefinition of death in 1968.

    Mita Giacomini

  • PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION.

    Julia Abelson;Frank Wagner;Deirdre DeJean;Sarah Boesveld

  • Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants

    Fiona A. Miller;R. Christensen;M. Giacomini;Jason Robert

  • How qualitative research can contribute to research in the intensive care unit.

    Tasnim Sinuff;Deborah J. Cook;Mita Giacomini

  • Comparative effects of levosulpiride and cisapride on gastric emptying and symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis.

    C. Mansi;P. Borro;M. Giacomini;R. Biagini

  • What does it mean to trust a health system? A qualitative study of Canadian health care values.

    Julia Abelson;Fiona A. Miller;Mita Giacomini

  • Life support in the intensive care unit: a qualitative investigation of technological purposes

    Deborah J. Cook;Mita Giacomini;Nancy Johnson;Dennis Willms

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Viscoli
Claudio Viscoli University of Genoa
Deborah J. Cook
Deborah J. Cook McMaster University
Jeremiah Hurley
Jeremiah Hurley McMaster University
Julia Abelson
Julia Abelson McMaster University
Matteo Bassetti
Matteo Bassetti University of Genoa
Paolo Pelosi
Paolo Pelosi University of Genoa
John N. Lavis
John N. Lavis McMaster University
Geert Huys
Geert Huys KU Leuven
Nunziatina De Tommasi
Nunziatina De Tommasi University of Salerno
Giancarlo Icardi
Giancarlo Icardi University of Genoa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a variety of pathways, many of which are now more accessible through online education. For those interested in social work, pursuing an online msw provides flexibility and affordability. These programs are designed for working professionals looking to advance or switch careers without sacrificing their current obligations.

Some students may prefer a more intensive route. Accelerated programs, such as the accelerated msw online, allow graduates to complete their degree in a shorter time frame, getting them into the workforce more quickly.

Those interested in behavioral sciences can benefit from specialized credentials like the bcba degree online, a critical qualification for careers in behavior analysis and therapy. Additionally, psychology remains a popular field, and an accelerated bachelor's degree psychology program can open doors to a range of opportunities, from counseling to research roles.

These online and accelerated options make it easier than ever to gain credentials and start or advance a meaningful career in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Mauro Giacomini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles