World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5623 5221 3065 2777 156 11350

Thomas A. Novack publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas A. Novack between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas A. Novack published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2019. 4 of the 189 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2019. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1980 2025

189 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas A. Novack: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 2
1986 1
1987 3
1988 3
1989 1
1990 1
1991 4
1992 3
1993 2
1994 0
1995 4
1996 3
1997 1
1998 3
1999 3
2000 8
2001 4
2002 7
2003 4
2004 5
2005 4
2006 6
2007 3
2008 7
2009 4
2010 9
2011 4
2012 6
2013 1
2014 6
2015 9
2016 6
2017 6
2018 6
2019 13
2020 8
2021 8
2022 10
2023 2
2024 3
2025 1
Total 189
Download as CSV

Thomas A. Novack publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. Novack sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 156
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas A. Novack D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. Novack sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Thomas A. Novack is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research spans several fields within medicine, with a primary focus on surgery, epidemiology, emergency medicine, physical therapy, sports therapy, rehabilitation, and neurology.

The scientist has contributed significantly to topics such as:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Orthopaedic Implants and Arthroplasty
  • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies

Key recent publications include:

  • "Factors Increasing Risk of Suicide after Traumatic Brain Injury: A State-of-the-Science Review of Military and Civilian Studies," 2021, Brain Injury
  • "Research Letter: Performance of the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone in a National Sample," 2021, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • "Return to Driving After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Study," 2021, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • "One and a Half-Stage Revision With Prosthetic Articulating Spacer for Definitive Management of Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection," 2022, Arthroplasty Today
  • "Patterns of Functional Change Five to Ten Years after Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury," 2021, Journal of Neurotrauma

The venues in which Novack frequently publishes research include:

  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • Brain Injury
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • JAAOS Global Research and Reviews
  • Premier journal of science.

Collaborations are a significant part of their research efforts. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Richard Kennedy
  • Laura E. Dreer
  • Robert Brunner
  • Charles H. Bombardier
  • Lisa J. Rapport

Thomas A. Novack has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 2006.

Best Publications

  • Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke

    E Taub;N E Miller;T A Novack;E W Cook rd

  • Current concepts: Diffuse axonal injury–associated traumatic brain injury

    Jay M. Meythaler;Jean D. Peduzzi;Evangelos Eleftheriou;Thomas A. Novack

  • Long-term neuropsychological outcome after traumatic brain injury.

    Scott R. Millis;Mitchell Rosenthal;Thomas A. Novack;Mark Sherer

  • Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research

    Elisabeth A. Wilde;Gale Gibson Whiteneck;Jennifer A. Bogner;Tamara Bushnik

  • Amantadine to improve neurorecovery in traumatic brain injury-associated diffuse axonal injury: a pilot double-blind randomized trial.

    Jay M. Meythaler;Robert C. Brunner;Alice Johnson;Thomas A. Novack

  • Outcome after traumatic brain injury: Pathway analysis of contributions from premorbid, injury severity, and recovery variables

    Thomas A. Novack;Beverly A. Bush;Jay M. Meythaler;Kay Canupp

  • Occupational categories and return to work after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter study

    William C. Walker;Jennifer H. Marwitz;Jeffrey S. Kreutzer;Tessa Hart

  • Effective serial measurement of cognitive orientation in rehabilitation: The orientation log

    Warren T. Jackson;Thomas A. Novack;Rachael N. Dowler

  • Effect of citicoline on functional and cognitive status among patients with traumatic brain injury: Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Trial (COBRIT)

    Ross D. Zafonte;Emilia Bagiella;Beth M. Ansel;Thomas A. Novack

  • Major and minor depression after traumatic brain injury.

    Tessa Hart;Lisa Anne Brenner;Allison N. Clark;Jennifer A. Bogner

  • The dilemma of the control condition in experience-based cognitive and behavioural treatment research.

    Tessa Hart;Jesse R Fann;Thomas A Novack

  • Influence of early variables in traumatic brain injury on functional independence measure scores and rehabilitation length of stay and charges

    Todd D. Cowen;Jay M. Meythaler;Michael J. DeVivo;Clarence S. Ivie

  • California verbal learning test (CVLT) performance in severely head-injured and neurologically normal adult males

    Bruce Crosson;Thomas A. Novack;Max R. Trenerry;Paul L. Craig

  • The predictive validity of a brief inpatient neuropsychologic battery for persons with traumatic brain injury

    Robin A. Hanks;Robin A. Hanks;Scott R. Millis;Scott R. Millis;Joseph H. Ricker;Joseph T. Giacino

  • Neuropsychological assessment and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury: a review.

    Mark Sherer;Thomas A Novack;Angelle M Sander;Margaret A Struchen

  • Measuring outcome in traumatic brain injury treatment trials: recommendations from the traumatic brain injury clinical trials network.

    Emilia Bagiella;Thomas A. Novack;Beth Ansel;Ramon Diaz-Arrastia

  • Cognitive and functional recovery at 6 and 12 months post-TBI

    Thomas A. Novack;Amy L. Alderson;Beverly A. Bush;Jay M. Meythaler

  • Awareness of behavioral, cognitive, and physical deficits in acute traumatic brain injury.

    Tessa Hart;Mark Sherer;John Whyte;Marcia Polansky

  • Assessment of level of consciousness following severe neurological insult. A comparison of the psychometric qualities of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Comprehensive Level of Consciousness Scale.

    Daniel E. Stanczak;James G. White;William D. Gouview;Kurt A. Moehle

  • Validity of the Orientation Log, relative to the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test.

    Thomas A. Novack;Rachael N. Dowler;Beverly A. Bush;Tannahill Glen

  • Gender and traumatic brain injury: do the sexes fare differently?

    Jonathan J. Ratcliff;Arlene I. Greenspan;Felicia C. Goldstein;Anthony Y. Stringer

Frequent Co-Authors

Tessa Hart
Tessa Hart Yeshiva University
Daniel C. Marson
Daniel C. Marson University of Alabama at Birmingham
Robin A. Hanks
Robin A. Hanks Wayne State University
Joseph T. Giacino
Joseph T. Giacino Massachusetts General Hospital
Scott R. Millis
Scott R. Millis Wayne State University
Sureyya Dikmen
Sureyya Dikmen University of Washington
Angelle M. Sander
Angelle M. Sander Baylor College of Medicine
John D. Corrigan
John D. Corrigan The Ohio State University
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia University of Pennsylvania
James F. Malec
James F. Malec Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options, allowing students to balance education with other commitments. Online psychology programs are structured to provide a solid foundation in theory, research, and practical skills—preparing graduates for diverse roles in mental health, education, human resources, and beyond.

If you’re searching for the top psychology programs in the Midwest, you’ll find a variety of flexible online offerings designed to fit busy schedules. Localized rankings help students identify leading institutions across regions, from the best psychology program rankings in Nebraska to metropolitan hubs like best psychology degree rankings in New York City and best psychology degree rankings in Newark.

These pathways support a range of career goals, from clinical practice to research, counseling, and organizational psychology. Many online programs also offer specialized tracks, making it easier to tailor your education to your interests and career aspirations. Pursuing an online psychology degree can extend your reach to prestigious programs, regardless of your location.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas A. Novack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles