World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 15297 14388 1401 1338 433 20995

Graham J. Kemp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Graham J. Kemp between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Graham J. Kemp published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 1993. 19 of the 504 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 1993. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 33 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 2 publications
1984 2026

504 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Graham J. Kemp: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 3
1986 3
1987 9
1988 7
1989 7
1990 6
1991 8
1992 13
1993 33
1994 14
1995 16
1996 16
1997 9
1998 8
1999 6
2000 5
2001 9
2002 2
2003 7
2004 7
2005 11
2006 6
2007 13
2008 8
2009 6
2010 6
2011 13
2012 21
2013 20
2014 23
2015 26
2016 18
2017 11
2018 15
2019 11
2020 14
2021 22
2022 16
2023 17
2024 18
2025 17
2026 2
Total 504
Download as CSV

Graham J. Kemp publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham J. Kemp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 433 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 433
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Graham J. Kemp D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham J. Kemp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Graham J. Kemp is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focused interest in subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics within neuroscience and medical imaging. Key areas of study include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on consensus recommendations and meta-analyses in magnetic resonance spectroscopy and neuroimaging. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Minimum Reporting Standards for in vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRSinMRS): Experts' consensus recommendations," 2021, published in NMR in Biomedicine
  • "31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy in skeletal muscle: Experts' consensus recommendations," 2020, published in NMR in Biomedicine
  • "The neuro-pathophysiology of temporomandibular disorders-related pain: a systematic review of structural and functional MRI studies," 2020, published in The Journal of Headache and Pain
  • "Neural correlates of neuroticism: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of resting-state functional brain imaging studies," 2023, published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Shared gray matter alterations in individuals with diverse behavioral addictions: A voxel-wise meta-analysis," 2020, published in Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Kemp frequently publishes in journals and venues such as:

  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • NMR in Biomedicine

Collaborations are a significant aspect of Graham J. Kemp's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Qiyong Gong
  • Xueling Suo
  • Song Wang
  • Du Lei
  • Nanfang Pan

This researcher's contributions to cognitive neuroscience and imaging-related medical fields reflect a diverse engagement with experimental, clinical, and methodological topics, with a notable emphasis on magnetic resonance techniques and brain connectivity studies.

Best Publications

  • Schwann cells, neurotrophic factors, and peripheral nerve regeneration

    Simon P. Frostick;Qi Yin;Qi Yin;Graham J. Kemp

  • Physical training improves skeletal muscle metabolism in patients with chronic heart failure

    Stamatis Adamopoulos;Stamatis Adamopoulos;Andrew J. S Coats;Andrew J. S Coats;Franois Brunotte;Leonard F Arnolda

  • Is depression a disconnection syndrome? Meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies in patients with MDD.

    Yi Liao;Xiaoqi Huang;Qizhu Wu;Chuang Yang

  • Effect of prehabilitation on objectively measured physical fitness after neoadjuvant treatment in preoperative rectal cancer patients: a blinded interventional pilot study

    M.A. West;M.A. West;L. Loughney;L. Loughney;D. Lythgoe;C.P. Barben

  • Resting-state functional connectivity in treatment-resistant depression.

    Su Lui;Qizhu Wu;Lihua Qiu;Xun Yang

  • Quantitative interpretation of bioenergetic data from 31P and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic studies of skeletal muscle: an analytical review.

    G J Kemp;G K Radda

  • Absolute quantification of phosphorus metabolite concentrations in human muscle in vivo by 31P MRS: a quantitative review

    Graham J. Kemp;Martin Meyerspeer;Ewald Moser

  • Polycystic Ovary Syndrome with Hyperandrogenism Is Characterized by an Increased Risk of Hepatic Steatosis Compared to Nonhyperandrogenic PCOS Phenotypes and Healthy Controls, Independent of Obesity and Insulin Resistance

    Helen Jones;Victoria S. Sprung;Christopher J. A. Pugh;Christina Daousi

  • Improved Glycaemia Correlates with Liver Fat Reduction in Obese, Type 2 Diabetes, Patients Given Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists

    Daniel J. Cuthbertson;Andrew Irwin;Chris J. Gardner;Christina Daousi

  • Abnormal Regional Spontaneous Neural Activity in Treatment-Refractory Depression Revealed by Resting-State fMRI

    Qi-Zhu Wu;Dong-Ming Li;Wei-Hong Kuang;Ti-Jiang Zhang

  • Brain grey matter abnormalities in medication-free patients with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis.

    Y.-J. Zhao;M.-Y. Du;X.-Q. Huang;S. Lui

  • Reduced physical activity in young and older adults: metabolic and musculoskeletal implications

    Kelly A. Bowden Davies;Samuel Pickles;Victoria S. Sprung;Graham J. Kemp

  • Control of phosphocreatine resynthesis during recovery from exercise in human skeletal muscle

    G. J. Kemp;D. J. Taylor;G. K. Radda

  • Ageing: Effects on oxidative function of skeletal muscle in vivo

    D. J. Taylor;G. J. Kemp;C. H. Thompson;G. K. Radda

  • Cardiopulmonary exercise variables are associated with postoperative morbidity after major colonic surgery: a prospective blinded observational study

    M.A. West;M.A. West;D. Lythgoe;C.P. Barben;L. Noble

  • Resistance training improves cardiac output, exercise capacity and tolerance to positive airway pressure in Fontan physiology☆

    Rachael L. Cordina;Rachael L. Cordina;Shamus O'Meagher;Shamus O'Meagher;Alia Karmali;Caroline L. Rae;Caroline L. Rae

  • Quantification of metabolic differences in the frontal brain of depressive patients and controls obtained by 1H-MRS at 3 Tesla.

    Stephan Gruber;Richard Frey;Vladimir Mlynarik;Andreas Stadlbauer

  • External validation of the fatty liver index and lipid accumulation product indices, using 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy, to identify hepatic steatosis in healthy controls and obese, insulin-resistant individuals.

    Daniel J. Cuthbertson;Martin O. Weickert;Daniel Lythgoe;Victoria S. Sprung

  • Effect of creatine on aerobic and anaerobic metabolism in skeletal muscle in swimmers.

    C H Thompson;G J Kemp;A L Sanderson;R M Dixon

Frequent Co-Authors

Qiyong Gong
Qiyong Gong Sichuan University
George K. Radda
George K. Radda Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Michael P. W. Grocott
Michael P. W. Grocott University of Southampton
Xiaoqi Huang
Xiaoqi Huang Sichuan University
Su Lui
Su Lui Sichuan University
Daniel J. Green
Daniel J. Green University of Western Australia
John A. Sweeney
John A. Sweeney University of Cincinnati
John P.H. Wilding
John P.H. Wilding University of Liverpool
Lingjiang Li
Lingjiang Li Central South University
Caroline Rae
Caroline Rae Neuroscience Research Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medical degrees, online nursing and advanced practice programs offer flexible and strategic pathways. A popular option is enrolling in dnp programs online, which allow nursing professionals to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice with the convenience of virtual learning. These online offerings are especially helpful for those seeking to balance ongoing employment with educational advancement.

Some professionals may prefer online dnp programs without clinicals, which can further streamline the process by waiving standard in-person requirements. For those at the beginning of their nursing journey, online lpn programs provide a quick entry into practical nursing roles and offer a foundation for further study.

Mental health is a growing specialty in healthcare. Fast-paced psychiatric np programs are available fully online, preparing nurses for advanced roles in psychiatric and mental health settings.

These online degrees can accelerate your career and offer diverse opportunities in the ever-evolving medical and healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Graham J. Kemp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles