World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 66 2660 2435 1532 1369 243 23117

James F. Malec publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James F. Malec between 1976 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James F. Malec published across 49 years, from 1976 to 2024, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2010. 8 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2010. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications
1976 2024

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James F. Malec: publications per year, 1976 to 2024
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 1
1978 2
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 2
1985 4
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 6
1991 6
1992 12
1993 8
1994 7
1995 4
1996 7
1997 8
1998 0
1999 2
2000 7
2001 1
2002 2
2003 10
2004 5
2005 8
2006 11
2007 7
2008 5
2009 8
2010 16
2011 9
2012 13
2013 6
2014 12
2015 11
2016 12
2017 15
2018 3
2019 5
2020 4
2021 4
2022 2
2023 2
2024 6
Total 261
Download as CSV

James F. Malec publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Malec sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 243 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 243
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James F. Malec D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Malec sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 66
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

James F. Malec is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and focuses on research primarily within the field of Medicine, contributing across several subfields including Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Neurology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, as well as Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's work mainly centers on the study of traumatic brain injury and related areas. Key topics of their research include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Occupational Therapy Practice and Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with James F. Malec are:

  • David B. Salisbury
  • Daniel M. Logan
  • G. Joseph Walters
  • Clare McGrath
  • Devan Parrott

The scientist has often published in the following venues:

  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • PM&R
  • EPJ Web of Conferences

Recent publications authored or co-authored by James F. Malec include:

  • "A Standard Method for Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Rehabilitation Measures" (2020) in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • "Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Providers" (2020) in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • "Rasch Analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory for Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation" (2024) in Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Additional papers linked to the research area where James F. Malec is involved include:

  • "Patterns of Functional Change Five to Ten Years after Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury" (2021) in Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "Response to: Can We Successfully Improve Attentional Impairments After Brain Injury With Computer-Based Interventions? Letter to the Editor on "Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of the Literature From 2009 Through 2014"" (2022) in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

James F. Malec has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 2000.

Best Publications

  • Definition of mild traumatic brain injury

    Thomas Kay;Douglas E. Harrington;Richard Adams;Thomas Anderson

  • Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008.

    Keith D. Cicerone;Donna M. Langenbahn;Cynthia Braden;James F. Malec

  • Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Recommendations for clinical practice

    Keith D. Cicerone;Cynthia Dahlberg;Kathleen Kalmar;Donna M. Langenbahn

  • Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002.

    Keith D. Cicerone;Cynthia Dahlberg;James F. Malec;Donna M. Langenbahn

  • The Mayo classification system for traumatic brain injury severity

    James F. Malec;Allen W. Brown;Cynthia L. Leibson;Julie Testa Flaada

  • Neuropsychological tests' norms above age 55: COWAT, BNT, MAE token, WRAT-R reading, AMNART, STROOP, TMT, and JLO

    Robert J. Ivnik;James F. Malec;Glenn E. Smith;Eric G. Tangalos

  • Mayo's older americans normative studies: WAIS-R norms for ages 56 to 97

    Robert J. Ivnik;James F. Malec;Glenn E. Smith;Eric G. Tangalos

  • Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of the Literature From 2009 Through 2014.

    Keith D. Cicerone;Yelena Goldin;Keith Ganci;Amy Rosenbaum

  • Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research

    Elisabeth A. Wilde;Gale Gibson Whiteneck;Jennifer A. Bogner;Tamara Bushnik

  • Mayo's older americans normative studies: Updated AVLT norms for ages 56 to 97

    Robert J. Ivnik;James F. Malec;Glenn E. Smith;Eric G. Tangalos

  • Cognitive Rehabilitation Interventions for Executive Function: Moving from Bench to Bedside in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

    Keith Cicerone;Harvey Levin;James Malec;Donald Stuss

  • The mayo high performance teamwork scale: reliability and validity for evaluating key crew resource management skills

    James F. Malec;Laurence C. Torsher;William F. Dunn;Douglas A. Wiegmann

  • An assessment of gait and balance deficits after traumatic brain injury

    Jeffrey R. Basford;Li Shan Chou;Kenton R. Kaufman;Robert H. Brey

  • Validation of Single-Item Linear Analog Scale Assessment of Quality of Life in Neuro-Oncology Patients

    Dona E.C. Locke;Paul A. Decker;Jeff A. Sloan;Paul D. Brown

  • Clinical elements that predict outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective multicenter recursive partitioning (decision-tree) analysis.

    Allen W. Brown;James F. Malec;Robyn L. McClelland;Nancy N. Diehl

  • The Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (AVLT): Norms for ages 55 years and older.

    Robert J. Ivnik;James F. Malec;Eric G. Tangalos;Ronald C. Petersen

  • Early cognitive status and productivity outcome after traumatic brain injury: findings from the TBI model systems.

    Mark Sherer;Angelle M. Sander;Todd G. Nick;Walter M. High

  • Postacute brain injury rehabilitation

    James F. Malec;Jeffrey S. Basford

  • Goal Attainment Scaling in Rehabilitation

    James F. Malec

  • Handbook of Behavioral Medicine

    James Malec

  • Mild traumatic brain injury

    James F. Malec

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Ivnik
Robert J. Ivnik Mayo Clinic
Glenn E. Smith
Glenn E. Smith University of Florida
Eric G. Tangalos
Eric G. Tangalos Mayo Clinic
Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
Emre Kokmen
Emre Kokmen Mayo Clinic
Walter R. Frontera
Walter R. Frontera University of Puerto Rico
Kenneth J. Ottenbacher
Kenneth J. Ottenbacher The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Sureyya Dikmen
Sureyya Dikmen University of Washington
Alan M. Jette
Alan M. Jette MGH Institute of Health Professions
Richard L. Lieber
Richard L. Lieber Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in pursuing psychology in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career opportunities to consider. Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) is a popular and rewarding pathway. Each state has specific requirements for becoming an MFT, so it’s essential to understand the local standards.

For example, these Boise mft certification requirements outline the necessary education, supervised experience, and licensing exams you’ll need for Idaho. If you’re considering the East Coast, you can review the requirements for how to become an mft in Boston.

The how to become a marriage and family therapist in Buffalo guide provides details for working in New York, while the Chandler mft certification requirements are essential for those aiming to practice in Arizona. These resources help clarify the pathways open to prospective therapists and highlight the value of accredited online degrees that meet state-specific criteria.

With the right education and training, you can pursue various careers in mental health care, counseling, and therapy across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing James F. Malec

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles