World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert J. Ivnik

Robert J. Ivnik

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
106
Citations
60868
World Ranking
459
National Ranking
297

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
61634
World Ranking
6378
National Ranking
3398

Robert J. Ivnik publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Ivnik sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 253 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert J. Ivnik D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Ivnik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert J. Ivnik is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. The Mayo Clinic is a well-known institution, suggesting that Robert J. Ivnik conducts research in a clinical or medical environment.

Information regarding recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields, main topics of work, and awards is not provided. Consequently, no additional specifics on Robert J. Ivnik's scholarly output or research focus are available at this time.

Based on the available data, Robert J. Ivnik is an active researcher and is not deceased.

Best Publications

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome

    Ronald C. Petersen;Glenn E. Smith;Stephen C. Waring;Robert J. Ivnik

  • Prediction of AD with MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment

    Clifford R. Jack;Ronald C. Petersen;Yue Cheng Xu;Peter C. O'Brien

  • Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later.

    Ronald Carl Petersen;Rosebud O Roberts;David S Knopman;Bradley F Boeve

  • Medial temporal atrophy on MRI in normal aging and very mild Alzheimer's disease

    Clifford R. Jack;Ronald C. Petersen;Yue Cheng Xu;Stephen C. Waring

  • Rates of hippocampal atrophy correlate with change in clinical status in aging and AD

    Clifford R. Jack;R. C. Petersen;Y. Xu;P. C. O'Brien

  • Comparison of Different MRI Brain Atrophy Rate Measures with Clinical Disease Progression in AD

    C. R. Jack;M. M. Shiung;J. L. Gunter;P. C. O'Brien

  • Aging, memory, and mild cognitive impairment.

    Ronald C. Petersen;Glenn E. Smith;Stephen C. Waring;Robert J. Ivnik

  • Apolipoprotein E status as a predictor of the development of Alzheimer's disease in memory-impaired individuals.

    Ronald C. Petersen;Glenn E. Smith;Robert J. Ivnik;Eric G. Tangalos

  • Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment is higher in men. The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.

    R. C. Petersen;R. O. Roberts;D. S. Knopman;Y. E. Geda

  • Rate of medial temporal lobe atrophy in typical aging and Alzheimer's disease

    Clifford R. Jack;Ronald C. Petersen;Yuecheng Xu;Peter C. O'Brien

  • The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: Design and Sampling, Participation, Baseline Measures and Sample Characteristics

    Rosebud O. Roberts;Yonas E. Geda;David S. Knopman;Ruth H. Cha

  • Detecting Dementia With the Mini-Mental State Examination in Highly Educated Individuals

    Sid E. O'Bryant;Joy D. Humphreys;Glenn E. Smith;Robert J. Ivnik

  • Neuropathologic features of amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

    Ronald C. Petersen;Joseph E. Parisi;Dennis W. Dickson;Kris A. Johnson

  • Neuropathology of cognitively normal elderly.

    David S. Knopman;J. E. Parisi;A. Salviati;M. Floriach-Robert

  • Prospective randomized trial of low- versus high-dose radiation therapy in adults with supratentorial low-grade glioma: initial report of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

    Unknown

  • Neuropsychological tests' norms above age 55: COWAT, BNT, MAE token, WRAT-R reading, AMNART, STROOP, TMT, and JLO

    Robert J. Ivnik;James F. Malec;Glenn E. Smith;Eric G. Tangalos

  • An operational approach to National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease

    Clifford R. Jack;David S. Knopman;Stephen D. Weigand;Heather J. Wiste

  • Brain atrophy rates predict subsequent clinical conversion in normal elderly and amnestic MCI

    Clifford R. Jack;M. M. Shiung;S. D. Weigand;P. C. O'Brien

  • Regional metabolic patterns in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A 1H MRS study.

    K. Kantarci;C.R. Jack;Y.C. Xu;N.G. Campeau

  • Association of Low Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 Ratios With Increased Imminent Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease

    Neill R. Graff-Radford;Julia E. Crook;John Lucas;Bradley F. Boeve

  • Mayo's older americans normative studies: WAIS-R norms for ages 56 to 97

    Robert J. Ivnik;James F. Malec;Glenn E. Smith;Eric G. Tangalos

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
Glenn E. Smith
Glenn E. Smith University of Florida
Bradley F. Boeve
Bradley F. Boeve Mayo Clinic
David S. Knopman
David S. Knopman Mayo Clinic
Eric G. Tangalos
Eric G. Tangalos Mayo Clinic
Clifford R. Jack
Clifford R. Jack Mayo Clinic
Emre Kokmen
Emre Kokmen Mayo Clinic
Kejal Kantarci
Kejal Kantarci Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Psychology in the USA, there are a variety of related online degrees and career options to consider. One increasingly popular pathway is substance abuse counseling. This field offers the opportunity to make a significant impact on individuals and communities by addressing issues related to addiction and mental health.

Requirements for becoming a counselor can vary significantly from state to state. For example, substance abuse counselor requirements in Baltimore differ from those in other regions. Understanding local regulations, licensing, and educational prerequisites is essential before choosing your career path.

Many aspiring professionals wonder how to become a substance abuse counselor in Boise or what steps are involved in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Boston. Coursework, supervised clinical experience, and certification exams are often required. In places like Buffalo, unique Buffalo substance abuse counselor certification requirements apply.

Exploring these pathways can help you determine which online degree and specialization best align with your interests and career goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. Ivnik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles