World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
48502
World Ranking
13392
National Ranking
6810

Emre Kokmen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emre Kokmen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 161 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Emre Kokmen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emre Kokmen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emre Kokmen is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their professional activities are linked to this prominent medical institution, indicating involvement in clinical medicine or related research sectors.

Although detailed information about their recent publications, co-authors, and specific fields or subfields of study is not available, the association with Mayo Clinic suggests engagement with medical research or healthcare practice.

There are no listed recent papers, book publications, frequent co-authors, or publication venues associated with Emre Kokmen in the available data. Likewise, their work's main fields of study, subfields, and main research topics have not been disclosed.

No awards or honors have been recorded for Emre Kokmen in the data provided. Additionally, the scientist is not deceased, which means they may currently be active in their professional capacity at the Mayo Clinic.

Given the lack of specific research outputs and thematic details, a more thorough understanding of Emre Kokmen's academic contributions would require access to further data sources such as medical journals or institutional profiles that detail clinical and research roles within the Mayo Clinic.

Best Publications

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome

    Ronald C. Petersen;Glenn E. Smith;Stephen C. Waring;Robert J. Ivnik

  • Prediction of AD with MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment

    Clifford R. Jack;Ronald C. Petersen;Yue Cheng Xu;Peter C. O'Brien

  • Medial temporal atrophy on MRI in normal aging and very mild Alzheimer's disease

    Clifford R. Jack;Ronald C. Petersen;Yue Cheng Xu;Stephen C. Waring

  • Rates of hippocampal atrophy correlate with change in clinical status in aging and AD

    Clifford R. Jack;R. C. Petersen;Y. Xu;P. C. O'Brien

  • Aging, memory, and mild cognitive impairment.

    Ronald C. Petersen;Glenn E. Smith;Stephen C. Waring;Robert J. Ivnik

  • Apolipoprotein E status as a predictor of the development of Alzheimer's disease in memory-impaired individuals.

    Ronald C. Petersen;Glenn E. Smith;Robert J. Ivnik;Eric G. Tangalos

  • Risk of Dementia among Persons with Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-based Cohort Study

    Cynthia L. Leibson;W. A. Rocca;V. A. Hanson;R. Cha

  • Rate of medial temporal lobe atrophy in typical aging and Alzheimer's disease

    Clifford R. Jack;Ronald C. Petersen;Yuecheng Xu;Peter C. O'Brien

  • Neuropathologic features of amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

    Ronald C. Petersen;Joseph E. Parisi;Dennis W. Dickson;Kris A. Johnson

  • Head Trauma as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer's Disease: A Collaborative Re-Analysis of Case-Control Studies

    J A Mortimer;C M van Duijn;V Chandra;L Fratiglioni

  • Antemortem MRI findings correlate with hippocampal neuropathology in typical aging and dementia

    Cr R. Jack;Dw W. Dickson;Je E. Parisi;Yc C. Xu

  • Regional metabolic patterns in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A 1H MRS study.

    K. Kantarci;C.R. Jack;Y.C. Xu;N.G. Campeau

  • Mayo's older americans normative studies: WAIS-R norms for ages 56 to 97

    Robert J. Ivnik;James F. Malec;Glenn E. Smith;Eric G. Tangalos

  • Dementia after ischemic stroke: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota (1960-1984)

    E. Kokmen;J. P. Whisnant;W. M. O'Fallon;C.-P. Chu

  • Memory and MRI-based hippocampal volumes in aging and AD

    Ronald C. Petersen;C. R. Jack;Y. C. Xu;S. C. Waring

  • Usefulness of MRI measures of entorhinal cortex versus hippocampus in AD.

    Y. Xu;C. R. Jack;P. C. O'Brien;E. Kokmen

  • REM sleep behavior disorder and degenerative dementia: An association likely reflecting Lewy body disease

    Bradley F. Boeve;M. H. Silber;T. J. Ferman;E. Kokmen

  • Memory function in very early Alzheimer's disease

    R. C. Petersen;G. E. Smith;R. J. Ivnik;E. Kokmen

  • Highly active antiretroviral therapy reverses brain metabolite abnormalities in mild HIV dementia.

    Chang L;Ernst T;Leonido-Yee M;Witt M

  • Motor Speech Disorders

    Emre Kokmen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
Glenn E. Smith
Glenn E. Smith University of Florida
Eric G. Tangalos
Eric G. Tangalos Mayo Clinic
Robert J. Ivnik
Robert J. Ivnik Mayo Clinic
Peter C. O'Brien
Peter C. O'Brien Mayo Clinic
Walter A. Rocca
Walter A. Rocca Mayo Clinic
Bradley F. Boeve
Bradley F. Boeve Mayo Clinic
James F. Malec
James F. Malec Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring alternative ways to enter the healthcare field or enhance your medical career, there are several flexible online degree paths available. Allied health programs such as the best online medical billing and coding schools offer options to work behind the scenes in healthcare administration and information management.

For those interested in patient care with fewer entrance barriers, consider options like lpn school without teas test. These programs allow you to start a nursing career without standardized test requirements, making education more accessible.

Moving into administrative roles is possible through an online healthcare management degree, which prepares graduates to lead teams, manage facilities, and impact health policy. Additionally, existing registered nurses seeking advancement can enroll in rn to np bridge programs, helping them progress to Nurse Practitioner roles.

These varied pathways provide flexibility, financial aid opportunities, and room for career advancement, offering excellent alternatives for those interested in healthcare careers or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Emre Kokmen

Recently Published Articles