World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
107
Citations
64417
World Ranking
435
National Ranking
279

Glenn E. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 343 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Glenn E. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glenn E. Smith is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a substantial concentration in Psychiatry and Mental Health. Other notable subfields include Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and General Health Professions.

Their main research topics comprise Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Cognitive Functions and Memory, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, and Chronic Disease Management Strategies.

Smith has contributed many publications, frequently appearing in several key venues, including:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Neuropsychology Review
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Their recent papers include:

  • "Cognitive Effects of Aerobic Exercise in Alzheimer's Disease: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial" (2021), Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • "Modular machine learning for Alzheimer's disease classification from retinal vasculature" (2021), Scientific Reports
  • "APOE3-Jacksonville (V236E) variant reduces self-aggregation and risk of dementia" (2021), Science Translational Medicine
  • "Early prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias using real-world electronic health records" (2023), Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Procedural Learning in Individuals with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Dementia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" (2020), Neuropsychology Review

They collaborate frequently with a consistent group of co-authors that includes Rosie E. Curiel, David Loewenstein, Melissa J. Armstrong, Michael Marsiske, and Mónica Rosselli.

Best Publications

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome

    Ronald C. Petersen;Glenn E. Smith;Stephen C. Waring;Robert J. Ivnik

  • Prediction of AD with MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment

    Clifford R. Jack;Ronald C. Petersen;Yue Cheng Xu;Peter C. O'Brien

  • Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later.

    Ronald Carl Petersen;Rosebud O Roberts;David S Knopman;Bradley F Boeve

  • Medial temporal atrophy on MRI in normal aging and very mild Alzheimer's disease

    Clifford R. Jack;Ronald C. Petersen;Yue Cheng Xu;Stephen C. Waring

  • Rates of hippocampal atrophy correlate with change in clinical status in aging and AD

    Clifford R. Jack;R. C. Petersen;Y. Xu;P. C. O'Brien

  • Comparison of Different MRI Brain Atrophy Rate Measures with Clinical Disease Progression in AD

    C. R. Jack;M. M. Shiung;J. L. Gunter;P. C. O'Brien

  • Aging, memory, and mild cognitive impairment.

    Ronald C. Petersen;Glenn E. Smith;Stephen C. Waring;Robert J. Ivnik

  • Pathophysiology of REM sleep behaviour disorder and relevance to neurodegenerative disease

    B. F. Boeve;M. H. Silber;C. B. Saper;T. J. Ferman

  • Apolipoprotein E status as a predictor of the development of Alzheimer's disease in memory-impaired individuals.

    Ronald C. Petersen;Glenn E. Smith;Robert J. Ivnik;Eric G. Tangalos

  • A Cognitive Training Program Based on Principles of Brain Plasticity: Results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) Study

    Glenn E. Smith;Patricia Housen;Kristine Yaffe;Ronald Ruff

  • Rate of medial temporal lobe atrophy in typical aging and Alzheimer's disease

    Clifford R. Jack;Ronald C. Petersen;Yuecheng Xu;Peter C. O'Brien

  • Detecting Dementia With the Mini-Mental State Examination in Highly Educated Individuals

    Sid E. O'Bryant;Joy D. Humphreys;Glenn E. Smith;Robert J. Ivnik

  • Cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients is common.

    Anne M Murray;David Tupper;David Tupper;D. S. Knopman;D. T. Gilbertson

  • DHEA in elderly women and DHEA or testosterone in elderly men

    K. Sreekumaran Nair;Robert A. Rizza;Peter O'brien;Ketan Dhatariya

  • Neuropathologic features of amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

    Ronald C. Petersen;Joseph E. Parisi;Dennis W. Dickson;Kris A. Johnson

  • Neuropathology of cognitively normal elderly.

    David S. Knopman;J. E. Parisi;A. Salviati;M. Floriach-Robert

  • Neuropsychological tests' norms above age 55: COWAT, BNT, MAE token, WRAT-R reading, AMNART, STROOP, TMT, and JLO

    Robert J. Ivnik;James F. Malec;Glenn E. Smith;Eric G. Tangalos

  • Brain atrophy rates predict subsequent clinical conversion in normal elderly and amnestic MCI

    Clifford R. Jack;M. M. Shiung;S. D. Weigand;P. C. O'Brien

  • Regional metabolic patterns in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A 1H MRS study.

    K. Kantarci;C.R. Jack;Y.C. Xu;N.G. Campeau

  • Association of Low Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 Ratios With Increased Imminent Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease

    Neill R. Graff-Radford;Julia E. Crook;John Lucas;Bradley F. Boeve

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
Robert J. Ivnik
Robert J. Ivnik Mayo Clinic
Bradley F. Boeve
Bradley F. Boeve Mayo Clinic
David S. Knopman
David S. Knopman Mayo Clinic
Eric G. Tangalos
Eric G. Tangalos Mayo Clinic
Clifford R. Jack
Clifford R. Jack Mayo Clinic
Kejal Kantarci
Kejal Kantarci Mayo Clinic
Emre Kokmen
Emre Kokmen Mayo Clinic
Joseph E. Parisi
Joseph E. Parisi Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens diverse career pathways in fields like counseling, therapy, research, and education. Today, many universities offer flexible online degrees in psychology and counseling, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments. Before choosing a program, it’s important to consider factors such as accreditation, faculty expertise, curriculum focus, and available support resources.

For those interested specifically in counseling, reviewing the best college counseling programs in the Northeast provides insights into top regional offerings. If you are located in New York or plan to move there, checking out the top counseling degree programs in New York is a smart step. Students based in the Midwest can explore the best college counseling programs in Ohio, while those considering study in the South Central region should review the best college counseling programs in Oklahoma.

Each state and region offers unique opportunities and specializations. Exploring these options can help you build a rewarding career in counseling, psychology, or a related mental health field.

Best Scientists Citing Glenn E. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles