World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephan Pfister

Stephan Pfister

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 63 2460 2346 71 67 172 15851

Stephan Pfister publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephan Pfister between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephan Pfister published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2015. 22 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2015. 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 8 publications
2009 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephan Pfister: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 5
2010 4
2011 14
2012 10
2013 10
2014 9
2015 20
2016 14
2017 15
2018 11
2019 16
2020 16
2021 13
2022 20
2023 16
2024 14
2025 8
Total 215
Download as CSV

Stephan Pfister publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan Pfister sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 172 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444 172
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephan Pfister D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan Pfister sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150 63
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephan Pfister is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the field of environmental science and engineering. Their research covers a broad spectrum of topics primarily related to sustainability, environmental impact, and resource management.

Their recent publications include:

  • Growing environmental footprint of plastics driven by coal combustion, 2021, Nature Sustainability
  • LC-IMPACT: A regionalized life cycle damage assessment method, 2020, Journal of Industrial Ecology
  • Regionalized life cycle assessment of present and future lithium production for Li-ion batteries, 2022, Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • A highly resolved MRIO database for analyzing environmental footprints and Green Economy Progress, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Toward sustainable reprocessing and valorization of sulfidic copper tailings: Scenarios and prospective LCA, 2023, The Science of The Total Environment

Pfister frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

The scientist collaborates often with other researchers, including:

  • Stefanie Hellweg
  • Laura Scherer
  • Christopher Oberschelp
  • Francesca Rosa
  • Alexandra Marques

Stephan Pfister's main fields of study are Environmental Science and Engineering.

Their subfields of specialization include:

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Ecology

Key topics covered in Pfister's work are:

  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Water resources management and optimization
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation

Best Publications

  • Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA

    Stephan Pfister;Annette Koehler;Stefanie Hellweg

  • Water scarcity assessments in the past, present, and future

    Junguo Liu;Hong Yang;Hong Yang;Simon N. Gosling;Matti Kummu

  • The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE)

    Anne Marie Boulay;Anne Marie Boulay;Jane Bare;Lorenzo Benini;Markus Berger

  • A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity

    Bradley G. Ridoutt;Stephan Pfister

  • Growing environmental footprint of plastics driven by coal combustion

    Unknown

  • Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment

    Anna Kounina;Anna Kounina;Manuele Margni;Manuele Margni;Jean-Baptiste Bayart;Anne-Marie Boulay

  • COMPARISON OF BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN APPROACHES TO CALCULATING THE WATER FOOTPRINTS OF NATIONS

    Kuishuang Feng;Ashok Chapagain;Sangwon Suh;Stephan Pfister

  • Environmental impacts of water use in global crop production: hotspots and trade-offs with land use.

    Stephan Pfister;Peter Bayer;Annette Koehler;Stefanie Hellweg

  • A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA

    Jean-Baptiste Bayart;Cécile Bulle;Louise Deschênes;Manuele Margni

  • Virtual Scarce Water in China

    Kuishuang Feng;Klaus Hubacek;Stephan Pfister;Yang Yu

  • Life Cycle Inventory and Carbon and Water FoodPrint of Fruits and Vegetables: Application to a Swiss Retailer

    Franziska Stoessel;Ronnie Juraske;Stephan Pfister;Stefanie Hellweg

  • Monthly water stress: spatially and temporally explicit consumptive water footprint of global crop production

    Stephan Pfister;Peter Bayer

  • Global Resources Outlook 2019: Natural Resources for the Future We Want

    B. Oberle;S. Bringezu;S. Hatfield-Dodds;S. Hellweg

  • Global emission hotspots of coal power generation

    Christopher Oberschelp;Stephan Pfister;Catherine Raptis;Stefanie Hellweg

  • Understanding the LCA and ISO water footprint: A response to Hoekstra (2016) “A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA”

    Stephan Pfister;Anne-Marie Boulay;Markus Berger;Michalis Hadjikakou

  • LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative

    Francesca Verones;Jane Bare;Cecile Bulle;Rolf Frischknecht

  • A new water footprint calculation method integrating consumptive and degradative water use into a single stand-alone weighted indicator

    Bradley G. Ridoutt;Stephan Pfister

  • LC-IMPACT: A regionalized life cycle damage assessment method

    Francesca Verones;Stefanie Hellweg;Assumpció Antón;Ligia B. Azevedo;Ligia B. Azevedo

  • Spatially Explicit Analysis of Biodiversity Loss Due to Global Agriculture, Pasture and Forest Land Use from a Producer and Consumer Perspective

    Abhishek Chaudhary;Stephan Pfister;Stefanie Hellweg

  • Projected water consumption in future global agriculture: Scenarios and related impacts

    Stephan Pfister;Peter Bayer;Annette Koehler;Stefanie Hellweg

  • GIS-Based Regionalized Life Cycle Assessment: How Big Is Small Enough? Methodology and Case Study of Electricity Generation

    Christopher L. Mutel;Stephan Pfister;Stephan Pfister;Stefanie Hellweg

  • The environmental relevance of freshwater consumption in global power production

    Stephan Pfister;Dominik Saner;Annette Koehler;Annette Koehler

Frequent Co-Authors

Bradley G. Ridoutt
Bradley G. Ridoutt Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Manuele Margni
Manuele Margni Polytechnique Montréal
Peter Fantke
Peter Fantke Technical University of Denmark
Olivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter Bayer
Peter Bayer Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Mark A. J. Huijbregts
Mark A. J. Huijbregts Radboud University
Assumpció Antón
Assumpció Antón Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology
Michael Zwicky Hauschild
Michael Zwicky Hauschild Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree related to Environmental Sciences can open diverse career pathways, especially when combined with fields like sociology, education, or social work. For instance, understanding societal impacts through a best online sociology bachelor degree can enhance your approach to environmental challenges by integrating social dynamics with ecological knowledge.

If you're interested in advancing education in environmental topics, exploring the online edd no dissertation options can offer flexible paths to a Doctor of Education degree without the time-consuming dissertation process, ideal for professionals balancing work and study.

For those seeking comprehensive leadership roles in education, the best online eds to edd programs provide streamlined advancement opportunities from a Master’s degree to a doctorate, focusing on practical skills and policy development.

Additionally, careers intersecting with community outreach and social justice in environmental fields may benefit from earning one of the cheapest online dsw programs, enabling professionals to support vulnerable populations affected by environmental issues while advancing their qualifications affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Stephan Pfister

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles