World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guido Sonnemann

Guido Sonnemann

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
10805
World Ranking
4925
National Ranking
216

Guido Sonnemann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guido Sonnemann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 204 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Guido Sonnemann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guido Sonnemann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA

    Oscar Ortiz;Oscar Ortiz;Francesc Castells;Guido Sonnemann

  • What Do We Know About Metal Recycling Rates

    T. E. Graedel;Julian Allwood;Jean-Pierre Birat;Matthias Buchert

  • Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges

    Javier Babí Almenar;Javier Babí Almenar;Thomas Elliot;Benedetto Rugani;Bodénan Philippe

  • Integrated life-cycle and risk assessment for industrial processes

    Guido Sonnemann;Francesc Castells;Marta Schuhmacher

  • A review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality

    Dieuwertje Schrijvers;Alessandra Hool;Gian Andrea Blengini;Wei Qiang Chen

  • Uncertainty assessment by a Monte Carlo simulation in a life cycle inventory of electricity produced by a waste incinerator

    Guido W. Sonnemann;Marta Schuhmacher;Francesc Castells

  • Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment.

    Michael Curran;Laura de Baan;An M. De Schryver;Rosalie van Zelm

  • Critical review of life cycle assessment (LCA) for the built environment at the neighborhood scale

    Marc Lotteau;Philippe Loubet;Maxime Pousse;Emmanuel Dufrasnes

  • Framework for scenario development in LCA

    Hanna Leena Pesonen;Tomas Ekvall;Günter Fleischer;Gjalt Huppes

  • A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20

    Sonia Valdivia;Cassia M. L. Ugaya;Jutta Hildenbrand;Marzia Traverso

  • Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products

    Andreas Ciroth;Matthias Finkbeiner;Marzia Traverso;Jutta Hildenbrand

  • Developing a systematic framework for consistent allocation in LCA

    Dieuwertje L. Schrijvers;Dieuwertje L. Schrijvers;Philippe Loubet;Guido Sonnemann;Guido Sonnemann

  • Life cycle assessment of two dwellings: One in Spain, a developed country, and one in Colombia, a country under development

    Oscar Ortiz-Rodríguez;Francesc Castells;Guido Sonnemann

  • Anticipating in-use stocks of carbon fiber reinforced polymers and related waste flows generated by the commercial aeronautical sector until 2050

    Anaële Lefeuvre;Sébastien Garnier;Leslie Jacquemin;Baptiste Pillain

  • Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment

    Sonia Valdivia;Jana Gerta Backes;Marzia Traverso;Guido Sonnemann

  • Anticipating in-use stocks of carbon fibre reinforced polymers and related waste generated by the wind power sector until 2050

    Anaële Lefeuvre;Sébastien Garnier;Leslie Jacquemin;Baptiste Pillain

  • Import‐based Indicator for the Geopolitical Supply Risk of Raw Materials in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessments

    Eskinder D. Gemechu;Christoph Helbig;Guido Sonnemann;Andrea Thorenz

  • Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment—part I: a critical review of existing methods

    Thomas Sonderegger;Markus Berger;Rodrigo Freitas de Alvarenga;Vanessa Bach

  • Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment: part II – recommendations on application-dependent use of existing methods and on future method development needs

    Markus Berger;Thomas Sonderegger;Rodrigo Freitas de Alvarenga;Vanessa Bach

  • From a critical review to a conceptual framework for integrating the criticality of resources into Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment

    Guido Sonnemann;Eskinder Demisse Gemechu;Naeem Adibi;Vincent De Bruille

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesc Castells
Francesc Castells Rovira i Virgili University
Marta Schuhmacher
Marta Schuhmacher Rovira i Virgili University
Bo Pedersen Weidema
Bo Pedersen Weidema Aalborg University
Cyril Aymonier
Cyril Aymonier Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jo Dewulf
Jo Dewulf Ghent University
Jeroen B. Guinée
Jeroen B. Guinée Leiden University
Michael Zwicky Hauschild
Michael Zwicky Hauschild Technical University of Denmark
Olivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career paths. Many students seek affordable options, making a low cost online general studies degree a practical starting point. Such programs often provide foundational knowledge while maintaining flexibility.

If you're looking for a degree that balances quality with manageable coursework, consider programs listed under easiest bachelors degree. These degrees can suit students juggling work or personal commitments without compromising educational value.

Specializing in Earth sciences, an online geology degree online offers insights into natural processes and environmental challenges, enhancing job prospects in research, conservation, and resource management.

Furthermore, expertise in spatial data analysis is increasingly vital. The top gis masters programs equip graduates with skills in Geographic Information Systems, highly sought after in urban planning, environmental consulting, and disaster management.

Best Scientists Citing Guido Sonnemann

Recently Published Articles