World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4146 3826 2318 2091 160 15696

James E. Cutting publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James E. Cutting between 1971 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James E. Cutting published across 53 years, from 1971 to 2023, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2021. 7 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2021. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 6 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications
1971 2023

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James E. Cutting: publications per year, 1971 to 2023
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 1
1973 3
1974 6
1975 5
1976 8
1977 3
1978 6
1979 4
1980 4
1981 5
1982 4
1983 1
1984 5
1985 3
1986 5
1987 4
1988 4
1989 0
1990 1
1991 3
1992 3
1993 2
1994 0
1995 4
1996 3
1997 3
1998 2
1999 5
2000 5
2001 2
2002 4
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 1
2007 5
2008 2
2009 2
2010 5
2011 4
2012 7
2013 4
2014 2
2015 4
2016 5
2017 4
2018 2
2019 5
2020 2
2021 14
2022 4
2023 3
Total 188
Download as CSV

James E. Cutting publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Cutting sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 160 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 160
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James E. Cutting D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Cutting sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1993 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

James E. Cutting is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the broad field of Arts and Humanities, with focused contributions in subfields such as Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Economics and Econometrics, Literature and Literary Theory, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Language and Linguistics.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Cinema and Media Studies
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Art History and Market Analysis
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Visual Culture and Art Theory
  • Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Mental Health Research Topics

James E. Cutting has published several papers, with a notable concentration in the journal Projections. Key publications include:

  • "Goldilocks Aesthetics," 2020, Projections
  • "Three Filmmaking Practices That Guide Our Attention to Popular Cinema," 2021, Art & Perception
  • "Evolution of the Depiction of Telephone Calls in Popular Movies," 2022, Projections
  • "Replies to Commentators on Movies on Our Minds," 2023, Projections
  • Additionally, they appear as a co-author on the paper "On the physical variables filmmakers use to engage viewers," 2022, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts

Another frequently appearing co-author is Kacie L. Armstrong.

Publication venues where James E. Cutting has contributed multiple works include:

  • Projections
  • Art & Perception
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

In 1993, James E. Cutting was recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

Best Publications

  • Recognizing Friends by Their Walk ; Gait Perception without Familiarity Cues

    James E. Cutting;Lynn T. Kozlowski

  • Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth*

    James E. Cutting;Peter M. Vishton

  • Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display

    Lynn T. Kozlowski;James E. Cutting

  • Perception with an eye for motion

    James E. Cutting

  • Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition.

    Catharine D. Barclay;James E. Cutting;Lynn T. Kozlowski

  • A biomechanical invariant for gait perception

    James E. Cutting;Dennis R. Proffitt;Lynn T. Kozlowski

  • Categories and boundaries in speech and music

    James E. Cutting;James E. Cutting;Burton S. Rosner

  • Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions

    Bennett I. Bertenthal;Dennis R. Proffitt;James E. Cutting

  • How the eye measures reality and virtual reality

    James E. Cutting

  • Minimodularity and the Perception of Layout

    Nicola Bruno;James E. Cutting

  • Generation of Synthetic Male and Female Walkers through Manipulation of a Biomechanical Invariant

    James E Cutting

  • Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow.

    James E. Cutting;Ken Springer;Paul A. Braren;Scott H. Johnson

  • Three Gradients and the Perception of Flat and Curved Surfaces

    James E. Cutting;Robert T. Millard

  • Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film

    James E. Cutting;Jordan E. DeLong;Christine E. Nothelfer

  • Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening.

    James E. Cutting

  • How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving objects.

    James E. Cutting;Peter M. Vishton;Paul A. Braren

  • Gait Perception as an Example of How We May Perceive Events

    James E. Cutting;Dennis R. Proffitt

  • The minimum principle and the perception of absolute, common, and relative motions

    James E. Cutting;Dennis R. Proffitt

  • Masking the motions of human gait

    James E. Cutting;Cassandra Moore;Roger Morrison

  • Quicker, Faster, Darker: Changes in Hollywood Film over 75 Years:

    James E Cutting;Kaitlin L Brunick;Jordan E DeLong;Catalina Iricinschi

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis R. Proffitt
Dennis R. Proffitt University of Virginia
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Lynn T. Kozlowski
Lynn T. Kozlowski University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Laurie Beth Feldman
Laurie Beth Feldman University at Albany, State University of New York
Daniel C. Richardson
Daniel C. Richardson University College London
Linda B. Smith
Linda B. Smith Indiana University
Anthony Chemero
Anthony Chemero University of Cincinnati
Marco Bertamini
Marco Bertamini University of Padua
Shaun Gallagher
Shaun Gallagher University of Memphis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a range of online degrees and dynamic career pathways, especially in fields like social work. Pursuing a career in social work typically requires specific educational qualifications that vary by state. For example, Idaho education requirements for social workers outline the necessary degrees and licensing steps, serving as a useful blueprint for prospective students.

State requirements can differ considerably. Understanding the social worker degree requirements in Illinois is crucial if you plan to work in that state, as they have specific recommendations about which degrees and licenses are accepted. Similarly, the social worker education requirements in Indiana emphasize the importance of specialized coursework and supervised experience.

Considering online degree programs can provide flexibility for those balancing other commitments, while still fulfilling local licensing mandates. Before making a decision, review the social worker education requirements in Iowa or your desired state to ensure your chosen program aligns with professional standards. Exploring these pathways will help prepare you for a rewarding career in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Cutting

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles