World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
15696
World Ranking
4146
National Ranking
2318

James E. Cutting publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Cutting sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 160 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James E. Cutting D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Cutting sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1993 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

James E. Cutting is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the broad field of Arts and Humanities, with focused contributions in subfields such as Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Economics and Econometrics, Literature and Literary Theory, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Language and Linguistics.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Cinema and Media Studies
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Art History and Market Analysis
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Visual Culture and Art Theory
  • Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Mental Health Research Topics

James E. Cutting has published several papers, with a notable concentration in the journal Projections. Key publications include:

  • "Goldilocks Aesthetics," 2020, Projections
  • "Three Filmmaking Practices That Guide Our Attention to Popular Cinema," 2021, Art & Perception
  • "Evolution of the Depiction of Telephone Calls in Popular Movies," 2022, Projections
  • "Replies to Commentators on Movies on Our Minds," 2023, Projections
  • Additionally, they appear as a co-author on the paper "On the physical variables filmmakers use to engage viewers," 2022, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts

Another frequently appearing co-author is Kacie L. Armstrong.

Publication venues where James E. Cutting has contributed multiple works include:

  • Projections
  • Art & Perception
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

In 1993, James E. Cutting was recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

Best Publications

  • Recognizing Friends by Their Walk ; Gait Perception without Familiarity Cues

    James E. Cutting;Lynn T. Kozlowski

  • Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth*

    James E. Cutting;Peter M. Vishton

  • Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display

    Lynn T. Kozlowski;James E. Cutting

  • Perception with an eye for motion

    James E. Cutting

  • Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition.

    Catharine D. Barclay;James E. Cutting;Lynn T. Kozlowski

  • A biomechanical invariant for gait perception

    James E. Cutting;Dennis R. Proffitt;Lynn T. Kozlowski

  • Categories and boundaries in speech and music

    James E. Cutting;James E. Cutting;Burton S. Rosner

  • Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions

    Bennett I. Bertenthal;Dennis R. Proffitt;James E. Cutting

  • How the eye measures reality and virtual reality

    James E. Cutting

  • Minimodularity and the Perception of Layout

    Nicola Bruno;James E. Cutting

  • Generation of Synthetic Male and Female Walkers through Manipulation of a Biomechanical Invariant

    James E Cutting

  • Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow.

    James E. Cutting;Ken Springer;Paul A. Braren;Scott H. Johnson

  • Three Gradients and the Perception of Flat and Curved Surfaces

    James E. Cutting;Robert T. Millard

  • Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film

    James E. Cutting;Jordan E. DeLong;Christine E. Nothelfer

  • Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening.

    James E. Cutting

  • How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving objects.

    James E. Cutting;Peter M. Vishton;Paul A. Braren

  • Gait Perception as an Example of How We May Perceive Events

    James E. Cutting;Dennis R. Proffitt

  • The minimum principle and the perception of absolute, common, and relative motions

    James E. Cutting;Dennis R. Proffitt

  • Masking the motions of human gait

    James E. Cutting;Cassandra Moore;Roger Morrison

  • Quicker, Faster, Darker: Changes in Hollywood Film over 75 Years:

    James E Cutting;Kaitlin L Brunick;Jordan E DeLong;Catalina Iricinschi

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis R. Proffitt
Dennis R. Proffitt University of Virginia
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Lynn T. Kozlowski
Lynn T. Kozlowski University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Laurie Beth Feldman
Laurie Beth Feldman University at Albany, State University of New York
Daniel C. Richardson
Daniel C. Richardson University College London
Linda B. Smith
Linda B. Smith Indiana University
Anthony Chemero
Anthony Chemero University of Cincinnati
Marco Bertamini
Marco Bertamini University of Padua
Shaun Gallagher
Shaun Gallagher University of Memphis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a range of online degrees and dynamic career pathways, especially in fields like social work. Pursuing a career in social work typically requires specific educational qualifications that vary by state. For example, Idaho education requirements for social workers outline the necessary degrees and licensing steps, serving as a useful blueprint for prospective students.

State requirements can differ considerably. Understanding the social worker degree requirements in Illinois is crucial if you plan to work in that state, as they have specific recommendations about which degrees and licenses are accepted. Similarly, the social worker education requirements in Indiana emphasize the importance of specialized coursework and supervised experience.

Considering online degree programs can provide flexibility for those balancing other commitments, while still fulfilling local licensing mandates. Before making a decision, review the social worker education requirements in Iowa or your desired state to ensure your chosen program aligns with professional standards. Exploring these pathways will help prepare you for a rewarding career in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Cutting

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles