World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 61 1382 1232 263 237 203 11088

Catherine Goodman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Catherine Goodman between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Catherine Goodman published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2017. 12 of the 228 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2017. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
1999 2025

228 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Catherine Goodman: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 6
2001 4
2002 2
2003 3
2004 4
2005 3
2006 9
2007 7
2008 13
2009 14
2010 8
2011 12
2012 15
2013 15
2014 12
2015 11
2016 13
2017 21
2018 6
2019 5
2020 9
2021 8
2022 7
2023 6
2024 7
2025 5
Total 228
Download as CSV

Catherine Goodman publications per year - data summary

  • Catherine Goodman, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, has 228 publications recorded across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1999 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 21 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2002, with 2 publications.
  • The rate of publication averages 8.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.4 per year counting only the 27 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 33 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1999-2007: 41 publications (4.6 per year); 2008-2016: 113 publications (12.6 per year); 2017-2025: 74 publications (8.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Catherine Goodman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Goodman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 203 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 203
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Catherine Goodman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Catherine Goodman, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, records 203 publications - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Catherine Goodman, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Catherine Goodman ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Catherine Goodman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Goodman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86 61
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Catherine Goodman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Catherine Goodman, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, records 61 D-Index - the 83rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 83% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Catherine Goodman, and about 17% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Catherine Goodman ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Catherine Goodman is affiliated with the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily Economics, Econometrics and Finance, and Medicine. Subfields of their work include Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Economics and Econometrics, Finance, General Health Professions, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their main topics of research cover Global Maternal and Child Health, Healthcare Systems and Reforms, Healthcare Policy and Management, Malaria Research and Control, Mosquito-borne diseases and control, Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, and Antibiotic Use and Resistance.

Goodman has published in several frequently appearing venues, including:

  • BMJ Global Health
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • Health Policy and Planning
  • International Journal of Health Policy and Management
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Among their recent papers are:

  • Infection prevention and control compliance in Tanzanian outpatient facilities: a cross-sectional study with implications for the control of COVID-19, 2020, The Lancet Global Health
  • When technology precedes regulation: the challenges and opportunities of e-pharmacy in low-income and middle-income countries, 2021, BMJ Global Health
  • What are the challenges for antibiotic stewardship at the community level? An analysis of the drivers of antibiotic provision by informal healthcare providers in rural India, 2021, Social Science & Medicine
  • The hidden financial burden of healthcare: a systematic literature review of informal payments in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2021, Wellcome Open Research
  • Patients with positive malaria tests not given artemisinin-based combination therapies: a research synthesis describing under-prescription of antimalarial medicines in Africa, 2020, BMC Medicine

Goodman frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable co-authors include:

  • Timothy Powell-Jackson
  • Christina Makungu
  • Francis Wafula
  • Jessica King
  • Dosila Ogira

Best Publications

  • The economic impact of malaria in Africa: a critical review of the evidence

    Reginald Ikechukwu Chima;Catherine A Goodman;Anne Mills

  • Medicine Sellers and Malaria Treatment in Sub-Saharan Africa: What Do They Do and How Can Their Practice Be Improved?

    Catherine Goodman;William Brieger;Alasdair Unwin;Anne Mills

  • Cost-effectiveness of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa.

    CA Goodman;PG Coleman;AJ Mills

  • Cost-effectiveness of malaria diagnostic methods in sub-Saharan Africa in an era of combination therapy.

    Samuel Shillcutt;Chantal M. Morel;Catherine Goodman;Paul Coleman

  • Can working with the private for-profit sector improve utilization of quality health services by the poor? A systematic review of the literature.

    Edith Patouillard;Catherine A Goodman;Catherine A Goodman;Kara G Hanson;Anne J Mills

  • Cost effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the debates surrounding decision rules.

    Samuel D. Shillcutt;Damian G. Walker;Catherine A. Goodman;Catherine A. Goodman;Anne J. Mills

  • Performance of retail pharmacies in low- and middle-income Asian settings: a systematic review

    Rosalind Miller;Catherine Goodman

  • Guidelines for field surveys of the quality of medicines: a proposal.

    Paul N. Newton;Sue J. Lee;Catherine Goodman;Facundo M. Fernández

  • Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experiment

    D Blaauw;E Erasmus;N Pagaiya;V Tangcharoensathein

  • Drug shop regulation and malaria treatment in Tanzania--why do shops break the rules, and does it matter?

    Catherine Goodman;Catherine Goodman;S Patrick Kachur;Salim Abdulla;Peter Bloland

  • Got ACTs? Availability, price, market share and provider knowledge of anti-malarial medicines in public and private sector outlets in six malaria-endemic countries

    Kathryn A O'Connell;Hellen Gatakaa;Stephen Poyer;Julius Njogu

  • Community accountability at peripheral health facilities: a review of the empirical literature and development of a conceptual framework

    Sassy Molyneux;Martin Atela;Vibian Angwenyi;Catherine Goodman

  • Monitoring fever treatment behaviour and equitable access to effective medicines in the context of initiatives to improve ACT access: baseline results and implications for programming in six African countries

    Megan Littrell;Hellen Gatakaa;Illah Evance;Stephen Poyer

  • Costs and consequences of large-scale vector control for malaria.

    Joshua O Yukich;Christian Lengeler;Fabrizio Tediosi;Fabrizio Tediosi;Nick Brown

  • Reducing user fees for primary health care in Kenya: Policy on paper or policy in practice?

    Jane Chuma;Janet Musimbi;Vincent Okungu;Catherine Goodman;Catherine Goodman

  • Prohibit, constrain, encourage, or purchase: how should we engage with the private health-care sector?

    Dominic Montagu;Catherine Goodman

  • Economic Analysis of Malaria Control in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Anne Mills;Catherine Goodman;Paul Coleman

  • Effect of the Affordable Medicines Facility—malaria (AMFm) on the availability, price, and market share of quality-assured artemisinin-based combination therapies in seven countries: a before-and-after analysis of outlet survey data

    Sarah Tougher;Yazoume Ye;John H Amuasi;John H Amuasi;Idrissa A Kourgueni

  • A pharmacy too far? Equity and spatial distribution of outcomes in the delivery of subsidized artemisinin-based combination therapies through private drug shops

    Justin M Cohen;Oliver Sabot;Kate Sabot;Megumi Gordon

  • Is Private Health Care the Answer to the Health Problems of the World's Poor?

    Kara Hanson;Lucy Gilson;Catherine Goodman;Anne Mills

Frequent Co-Authors

Kara Hanson
Kara Hanson London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Anne Mills
Anne Mills London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Sassy Molyneux
Sassy Molyneux University of Oxford
Virginia Wiseman
Virginia Wiseman London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Robert W. Snow
Robert W. Snow Kenya Medical Research Institute
Abdisalan M. Noor
Abdisalan M. Noor World Health Organization
Lenka Benova
Lenka Benova Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Lucy Gilson
Lucy Gilson University of Cape Town
Mike English
Mike English Wellcome Trust
Simon Brooker
Simon Brooker Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities studies in the USA offers a variety of flexible online pathways. Students interested in psychology may want to consider the cheapest psyd programs for affordable doctoral-level education with clinical focus. For those looking to become licensed marriage and family therapists, accelerated online mft programs can fast-track your journey into counseling careers.

A common question for aspiring professionals is, how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology? Costs and program lengths vary, but there are many affordable online options. If education leadership is your goal, an edd online can open doors to academic administration and policy-making.

Whether you aim for practice, research, or academic advancement, online degrees in these fields deliver flexibility and create a wide range of career opportunities in education, healthcare, and social services.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Goodman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles