World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
5796
World Ranking
7656
National Ranking
4101

John F. Feldhusen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Feldhusen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 255 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John F. Feldhusen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Feldhusen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John F. Feldhusen was affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. The academic record available does not list recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues linked to their research.

Details about John F. Feldhusen's primary research fields, subfields, and main topics are not specified in the provided data. Likewise, there are no records of books published or awards received listed for this individual.

The lack of specific publications or topics makes it difficult to outline the exact scope or focus areas within their academic career. Similarly, without information on co-authors or frequent venues of publication, no further characterization of collaborative networks or journal preferences can be made.

John F. Feldhusen is noted as deceased. The available data thus captures only basic biographical and institutional affiliation details without additional scholarly contributions documented in this record.

Best Publications

  • Identification of Gifted and Talented Youth for Educational Programs

    John F. Feldhusen;Fathi A. Jarwan

  • Assessing and Accessing Creativity: An Integrative Review of Theory, Research, and Development

    Unknown

  • Comparison of Trained and Untrained Teachers of Gifted Students

    Jan B. Hansen;John F. Feldhusen

  • Creativity: A Knowledge Base, Metacognitive Skills, and Personality Factors

    John F. Feldhusen

  • Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective

    David Yun Dai;Sidney M. Moon;John F. Feldhusen

  • Meta-Analyses and Review of Research on Pull-Out Programs in Gifted Education.

    Vicki L. Vaughn;John F. Feldhusen;J. William Asher

  • Mentors, role models, and heroes in the lives of gifted children

    Mary K. Pleiss;John F. Feldhusen

  • Talent Recognition and Development: Successor to Gifted Education.

    Donald J. Treffinger;John F. Feldhusen

  • Grouping Gifted Students: Issues and Concerns

    John F. Feldhusen;Sidney M. Moon

  • Problems in the Assessment of Creative Thinking

    Donald J. Treffinger;Joseph S. Renzulli;John F. Feldhusen

  • Talent identification and development in education (TIDE)

    John F. Feldhusen

  • Specialized Counseling Services for Gifted Youth and Their Families: A Needs Assessment:

    Sidney M. Moon;Kevin R. Kelly;John F. Feldhusen

  • Boredom or Challenge for the Academically Talented in School

    John F. Feldhusen;Mark D. Kroll

  • Giftedness, Talent, Expertise, and Creative Achievement

    Unknown

  • Developing Creative Thinking: The Purdue Creativity Program.

    John F. Feldhusen;Donald J. Treffinger;Susan J. Bahlke

  • Long-Term Effects of an Enrichment Program Based on the Purdue Three-Stage Model:

    Sidney M. Moon;John F. Feldhusen;Deborah R. Dillon

  • Anxiety, intelligence, and achievement in children of low, average, and high intelligence.

    John F. Feldhusen;Herbert J. Klausmeier

  • It's not how the pond makes you feel, but rather how high you can jump.

    Jonathan A. Plucker;Nancy M. Robinson;Thomas S. Greenspon;John F. Feldhusen

  • Cluster grouping of gifted students at the elementary level

    Steven M. Hoover;Micheal Sayler;John F. Feldhusen

  • A Three-Stage Model for Gifted Education:

    John F. Feldhusen;Margaret B. Kolloff

  • Guidelines for grade advancement of precocious children

    John F. Feldhusen;Theron B. Proctor;Kathryn N. Black

  • A conception of talent and talent development.

    John F. Feldhusen

  • Gifted Child Quarterly

    John F. Feldhusen;Marie Almond

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy M. Robinson
Nancy M. Robinson University of Washington
Steven V. Owen
Steven V. Owen The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Joel R. Levin
Joel R. Levin University of Arizona
Jonathan A. Plucker
Jonathan A. Plucker Johns Hopkins University
D. Betsy McCoach
D. Betsy McCoach University of Connecticut
Joseph S. Renzulli
Joseph S. Renzulli University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse careers, both in traditional and online formats. Many top universities in the United States now offer flexible options that make it easier for students nationwide to access quality programs.

Determining which program is best for you often depends on location, specialization, and program reputation. For example, if you’re interested in opportunities in Virginia, the best psychology program rankings in Fairfax offer insights into highly ranked institutions in the region. Those considering the Southeast can review the best psychology degree rankings in Florida or look at best psychology degree rankings in Georgia for guidance.

If you’re open to heading north, the top psychology degrees in Grand Forks can also be a great fit, especially for students seeking renowned faculty and research opportunities.

With these comprehensive rankings as a starting point, students can identify programs aligned to their interests and choose a pathway that leads to rewarding careers in fields such as counseling, research, education, or mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing John F. Feldhusen

Recently Published Articles