World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 38 4448 4169 183 182 79 4958

Jean-Marc Guehl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jean-Marc Guehl between 1987 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jean-Marc Guehl published across 35 years, from 1987 to 2021, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1996. 1 of the 91 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1996. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 5 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1987 2021

91 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jean-Marc Guehl: publications per year, 1987 to 2021
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 5
1989 6
1990 4
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 4
1995 2
1996 7
1997 7
1998 2
1999 2
2000 5
2001 3
2002 1
2003 1
2004 7
2005 5
2006 3
2007 1
2008 5
2009 2
2010 0
2011 2
2012 0
2013 1
2014 3
2015 1
2016 2
2017 3
2018 1
2019 1
2020 0
2021 1
Total 91
Download as CSV

Jean-Marc Guehl publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Marc Guehl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 76–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 79 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191 79
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Jean-Marc Guehl D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Marc Guehl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247 38
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

Botany, Pinus pinaster, Stomatal conductance, Quercus robur and Chemistry are his primary areas of study. His research in Botany is mostly focused on Specific leaf area. His Stomatal conductance research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Canopy, Soil respiration, Water-use efficiency, Rainforest and Dry season.

His Quercus robur research includes elements of Quantitative trait locus, Fagaceae and Evergreen. His work deals with themes such as Quantitative genetics and Heritability, which intersect with Quantitative trait locus. Jean-Marc Guehl has included themes like Quercus petraea and Nutrient in his Transpiration study.

His most cited work include:

  • Interseasonal comparison of CO 2 concentrations, isotopic composition, and carbon dynamics in an Amazonian rainforest (French Guiana) (187 citations)
  • Impact of severe dry season on net ecosystem exchange in the Neotropical rainforest of French Guiana (168 citations)
  • Mapping the proteome of poplar and application to the discovery of drought-stress responsive proteins. (155 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Chemistry, Stomatal conductance, Water-use efficiency and Horticulture. His studies in Botany integrate themes in fields like Forestry and Carbon dioxide. In his study, Dry season and Rainforest is strongly linked to Canopy, which falls under the umbrella field of Stomatal conductance.

His Water-use efficiency research integrates issues from Pseudotsuga macrocarpa and Pinus pinaster. His Horticulture study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Biomass, Specific leaf area and Growing season. Jean-Marc Guehl combines subjects such as Soil water and Agronomy with his study of Transpiration.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (63.16%)
  • Chemistry (27.63%)
  • Stomatal conductance (28.95%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2004-2021)?

  • Botany (63.16%)
  • Stomatal conductance (28.95%)
  • Water-use efficiency (27.63%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Botany, Stomatal conductance, Water-use efficiency, Quantitative trait locus and Ecology. His multidisciplinary approach integrates Botany and Chemistry in his work. The Water-use efficiency study combines topics in areas such as Fagaceae and Quercus robur.

His Quercus robur research focuses on Photosynthetic capacity and how it relates to Genetic diversity and Transpiration. His study explores the link between Quantitative trait locus and topics such as Heritability that cross with problems in Water use and Pinus pinaster. His work on Dry season and Rainforest as part of general Ecology study is frequently linked to Environmental science, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Between 2004 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Impact of severe dry season on net ecosystem exchange in the Neotropical rainforest of French Guiana (168 citations)
  • Mapping the proteome of poplar and application to the discovery of drought-stress responsive proteins. (155 citations)
  • Quantitative trait loci controlling water use efficiency and related traits in Quercus robur L. (85 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

Jean-Marc Guehl mainly focuses on Genetics, Botany, Quantitative trait locus, Quercus robur and Horticulture. His Expressed sequence tag, Phenotype and Genetic marker study, which is part of a larger body of work in Genetics, is frequently linked to Family-based QTL mapping, bridging the gap between disciplines. The study of Botany is intertwined with the study of Primordium in a number of ways.

His study in Quantitative trait locus is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Chlorophyll, Agronomy, Vapour Pressure Deficit, Water-use efficiency and Candidate gene. The study incorporates disciplines such as Genetic architecture, Genetic variation and Stomatal conductance in addition to Quercus robur. His study in the field of Greenhouse also crosses realms of Delta.

Best Publications

  • Impact of severe dry season on net ecosystem exchange in the Neotropical rainforest of French Guiana

    Damien Bonal;Alexandre Bosc;Stéphane Ponton;Jean-Yves Goret

  • Interseasonal comparison of CO2 concentrations, isotopic composition, and carbon dynamics in an Amazonian rainforest (French Guiana).

    Nina Buchmann;Jean-Marc Guehl;Têtè Sévérien Barigah;James R. Ehleringer

  • Mapping the proteome of poplar and application to the discovery of drought-stress responsive proteins.

    Christophe Plomion;Céline Lalanne;Stéphane Claverol;Hakim Meddour

  • Leaf gas exchange and carbon isotope composition responses to drought in a drought‐avoiding (Pinus pinaster) and a drought‐tolerant (Quercus petraea) species under present and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations

    C. Picon;J. M. Guehl;A. Ferhi

  • Responses of Antioxidative Systems to Drought Stress in Pendunculate Oak and Maritime Pine as Modulated by Elevated CO2.

    Peter Schwanz;Catherine Picon;Philippe Vivin;Erwin Dreyer

  • Differential response of leaf conductance, carbon isotope discrimination and water‐use efficiency to nitrogen deficiency in maritime pine and pedunculate oak plants

    Jean‐Marc Guehl;Christine Fort;André Ferhi

  • Genetic parameters and QTL analysis of δ13C and ring width in maritime pine

    O. Brendel;D. Pot;C. Plomion;P. Rozenberg

  • Interspecific variability of δ13C among trees in rainforests of French Guiana: functional groups and canopy integration.

    Damien Bonal;Daniel Sabatier;Pierre Montpied;D. Tremeaux

  • Modelling forest transpiration and CO2 fluxes—response to soil moisture stress

    Jean-Christophe Calvet;Vincent Rivalland;Catherine Picon-Cochard;Jean-Marc Guehl

  • Quantitative trait loci controlling water use efficiency and related traits in Quercus robur L.

    Oliver Brendel;Didier Le Thiec;Caroline Scotti-Saintagne;Caroline Scotti-Saintagne;Catherine Bodénès

  • Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and soil drought on growth and transpiration efficiency and its determinants in two European forest tree species

    J. M. Guehl;C. Picon;G. Aussenac;P. Gross

  • Diversity of leaf traits related to productivity in 31 Populus deltoides x Populus nigra clones

    Nicolas Marron;Marc Villar;Erwin Dreyer;Didier Delay

  • Comparison of quantitative trait loci for adaptive traits between oak and chestnut based on an expressed sequence tag consensus map.

    Manuela Casasoli;Jeremy Derory;Caroline Morera-Dutrey;Oliver Brendel

  • The effects of soil and atmospheric drought on photosynthesis and stomatal control of gas exchange in three coniferous species

    P. Grieu;J. M. Guehl;G. Aussenac

  • Pioneer and late stage tropical rainforest tree species (French Guiana) growing under common conditions differ in leaf gas exchange regulation, carbon isotope discrimination and leaf water potential.

    R. Huc;A. Ferhi;J. M. Guehl

  • Functional diversity in an Amazonian rainforest of French Guyana: a dual isotope approach (δ 15 N and δ 13 C).

    J. M. Guehl;A. M. Domenach;M. Bereau;T. S. Barigah

  • Differential growth response to atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment in seedlings of Cedrusatlantica and Pinusnigra ssp. Laricio var. Corsicana

    P. Kaushal;J. M. Guehl;G. Aussenac

  • Photosynthesis Decrease and Stomatal Control of Gas Exchange in Abies alba Mill. in Response to Vapor Pressure Difference

    Jean-Marc Guehl;Gilbert Aussenac

  • Impact of fertilization on tree-ring δ15N and δ13C in beech stands: a retrospective analysis

    Sliman Elhani;Jean-Marc Guehl;Claude Nys;Jean-François Picard

  • Growth dynamics, transpiration and water-use efficiency in Quercus robur plants submitted to elevated CO2 and drought

    C Picon;JM Guehl;G Aussenac

  • Late‐stage canopy tree species with extremely low δ13C and high stomatal sensitivity to seasonal soil drought in the tropical rainforest of French Guiana

    D. Bonal;T. S. Barigah;A. Granier;J. M. Guehl

Frequent Co-Authors

Damien Bonal
Damien Bonal University of Lorraine
Christophe Plomion
Christophe Plomion University of Bordeaux
André Granier
André Granier INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Daniel Sabatier
Daniel Sabatier University of Montpellier
Jean Garbaye
Jean Garbaye INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Hervé Cochard
Hervé Cochard INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Daniel Epron
Daniel Epron Kyoto University
Erwin Dreyer
Erwin Dreyer INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Francis Martin
Francis Martin University of Lorraine
Annegret Kohler
Annegret Kohler University of Lorraine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Marc Guehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles