World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 47 2717 2463 1316 1181 74 12430

Elsa Callen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elsa Callen between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elsa Callen published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2024. 11 of the 85 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2024. 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 1 publication
2002 2025

85 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elsa Callen: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 4
2003 0
2004 3
2005 1
2006 1
2007 5
2008 4
2009 3
2010 1
2011 5
2012 3
2013 5
2014 2
2015 3
2016 4
2017 2
2018 1
2019 2
2020 7
2021 6
2022 5
2023 7
2024 10
2025 1
Total 85
Download as CSV

Elsa Callen publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elsa Callen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 67–76 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 74 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65 74
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Elsa Callen D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elsa Callen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121 47
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Elsa Callen is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research portfolio includes extensive work in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with additional contributions in Medicine.

Their primary subfields of study encompass Molecular Biology, Oncology, Hematology, Genetics, and Plant Science. The main topics addressed in their research involve:

  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations

Elsa Callen has published multiple papers, with recent notable works including:

  • "Polθ inhibitors elicit BRCA-gene synthetic lethality and target PARP inhibitor resistance," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Neuronal enhancers are hotspots for DNA single-strand break repair," 2021, Nature
  • "Repeat expansions confer WRN dependence in microsatellite-unstable cancers," 2020, Nature
  • "ATM and PRDM9 regulate SPO11-bound recombination intermediates during meiosis," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Active DNA demethylation promotes cell fate specification and the DNA damage response," 2022, Science

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including André Nussenzweig, Wei Wu, Dali Zong, Raphael Pavani, and William J. Nathan. Their work has appeared predominantly in venues such as Molecular Cell, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature, Nature Communications, and Science.

Best Publications

  • 53BP1 Inhibits Homologous Recombination in Brca1-Deficient Cells by Blocking Resection of DNA Breaks

    Samuel F. Bunting;Elsa Callén;Nancy Wong;Hua Tang Chen

  • Replication fork stability confers chemoresistance in BRCA-deficient cells

    Arnab Ray Chaudhuri;Elsa Callen;Xia Ding;Ewa Gogola

  • AID Is Required for the Chromosomal Breaks in c-myc that Lead to c-myc/IgH Translocations

    Davide F. Robbiani;Anne Bothmer;Elsa Callen;Bernardo Reina-San-Martin

  • A chromatin-wide transition to H4K20 monomethylation impairs genome integrity and programmed DNA rearrangements in the mouse

    Gunnar Schotta;Roopsha Sengupta;Roopsha Sengupta;Stefan Kubicek;Stephen Malin

  • Identification of Early Replicating Fragile Sites that Contribute to Genome Instability

    Jacqueline H. Barlow;Robert B. Faryabi;Elsa Callén;Nancy Wong

  • Rif1 Prevents Resection of DNA Breaks and Promotes Immunoglobulin Class Switching

    Michela Di Virgilio;Elsa Callen;Arito Yamane;Wenzhu Zhang

  • Role of genomic instability and p53 in AID-induced c-myc-Igh translocations

    Almudena Rodriguez Ramiro;Mila Jankovic;Elsa Callen;Simone Difilippantonio

  • 53BP1 mediates productive and mutagenic DNA repair through distinct phosphoprotein interactions

    Elsa Callen;Michela Di Virgilio;Michael J. Kruhlak;Maria Nieto-Soler

  • Genome Organization Drives Chromosome Fragility

    Andres Canela;Yaakov Maman;Seolkyoung Jung;Nancy Wong

  • 53BP1 facilitates long-range DNA end-joining during V(D)J recombination

    Simone Difilippantonio;Eric Gapud;Nancy Wong;Ching Yu Huang

  • BRCA1 functions independently of homologous recombination in DNA interstrand crosslink repair.

    Samuel F. Bunting;Elsa Callén;Marina L. Kozak;Jung Min Kim

  • Regulation of DNA end joining, resection, and immunoglobulin class switch recombination by 53BP1.

    Anne Bothmer;Davide F. Robbiani;Michela Di Virgilio;Samuel F. Bunting

  • Essential Role for DNA-PKcs in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair and Apoptosis in ATM-Deficient Lymphocytes

    Elsa Callén;Mila Jankovic;Nancy Wong;Shan Zha

  • Polθ inhibitors elicit BRCA-gene synthetic lethality and target PARP inhibitor resistance.

    Diana Zatreanu;Helen M. R. Robinson;Omar Alkhatib;Marie Boursier

  • DNA-damage-induced differentiation of leukaemic cells as an anti-cancer barrier

    Margarida A. Santos;Robert B. Faryabi;Aysegul V. Ergen;Amanda M. Day

  • ATM Prevents the Persistence and Propagation of Chromosome Breaks in Lymphocytes

    Elsa Callén;Mila Jankovic;Simone Difilippantonio;Jeremy A. Daniel

  • Plasmodium Infection Promotes Genomic Instability and AID-Dependent B Cell Lymphoma.

    Davide F. Robbiani;Stephanie Deroubaix;Niklas Feldhahn;Thiago Y. Oliveira

  • Dual Roles of Poly(dA:dT) Tracts in Replication Initiation and Fork Collapse.

    Anthony Tubbs;Sriram Sridharan;Niek van Wietmarschen;Yaakov Maman

  • Topoisomerase II-Induced Chromosome Breakage and Translocation Is Determined by Chromosome Architecture and Transcriptional Activity.

    Andres Canela;Yaakov Maman;Shar-yin N. Huang;Gordana Wutz

  • Histone H2AX and Fanconi anemia FANCD2 function in the same pathway to maintain chromosome stability

    Massimo Bogliolo;Alex Lyakhovich;Elsa Callén;Maria Castellà

Frequent Co-Authors

André Nussenzweig
André Nussenzweig National Institutes of Health
Michel C. Nussenzweig
Michel C. Nussenzweig Rockefeller University
Jordi Surrallés
Jordi Surrallés Autonomous University of Barcelona
Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo
Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo Spanish National Cancer Research Centre
Barry P. Sleckman
Barry P. Sleckman University of Alabama at Birmingham
Ricard Marcos
Ricard Marcos Autonomous University of Barcelona
Amadeu Creus
Amadeu Creus Autonomous University of Barcelona
Michael J. Kruhlak
Michael J. Kruhlak National Institutes of Health
Davide F. Robbiani
Davide F. Robbiani Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Detlev Schindler
Detlev Schindler University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Molecular Biology opens doors to a range of related online degrees and career paths. Many students supplement their science expertise with specialized programs in fields like mental health, counseling, and psychology. These areas are experiencing high demand and often offer flexible, online learning options.

If you’re interested in healthcare or community support, social work masters programs online provide training in advocacy, case management, and direct client services. Similarly, an online masters in psychology can equip you with insights into human behavior and mental health—skills that are valuable alongside a molecular science background.

For those seeking licensure and clinical roles, an online masters degree in mental health counseling is an efficient path toward professional practice. Another evolving field is forensic science; combining biology and psychology can be powerful for forensic investigations. You might consider a forensic psychology degree to work at the intersection of science, law, and public safety.

Ultimately, integrating molecular biology with related online education can enhance your career prospects in both scientific and human-centered roles.

Best Scientists Citing Elsa Callen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles