World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel Zimprich

Daniel Zimprich

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
3734
World Ranking
11210
National Ranking
541

Daniel Zimprich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Zimprich sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel Zimprich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Zimprich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Zimprich is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany and focuses research primarily in the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their work encompasses subfields including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

Zimprich has published extensively, with frequent contributions appearing in journals such as Memory, Memory & Cognition, Frontiers in Psychology, Psychology and Aging, and Biological Psychology.

Selected recent papers include:

  • Are interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task problematic? A comment on Zamariola et al. (2018), 2020, Biological Psychology
  • The valence and the functions of autobiographical memories: Does intensity matter?, 2021, Consciousness and Cognition
  • Age-Related Effects on Interoceptive Accuracy, General Interoceptive Sensibility, and Specific Interoceptive Sensibility, 2020, European Journal of Health Psychology
  • What characterizes the reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory? New answers to an old question, 2020, Memory & Cognition
  • Order effects in the recall of autobiographical memories: evidence for an organisation along temporal and emotional features, 2021, Memory

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Tabea Wolf
  • Lisa Nusser
  • Sophie Hoehne
  • Justina Pociūnaitė
  • Olga Pollatos

Best Publications

  • Cross-Sectional Age Differences and Longitudinal Age Changes of Personality in Middle Adulthood and Old Age

    Mathias Allemand;Daniel Zimprich;Christopher Hertzog

  • Age differences in five personality domains across the life span

    Mathias Allemand;Daniel Zimprich;A. A. Jolijn Hendriks

  • The role of trait forgiveness and relationship satisfaction in episodic forgiveness

    Mathias Allemand;Irina Amberg;Daniel Zimprich;Frank D. Fincham

  • Can longitudinal changes in processing speed explain longitudinal age changes in fluid intelligence

    Daniel Zimprich;Mike Martin

  • Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire Across the Adult Life Span

    Philippe Rast;Daniel Zimprich;Martin Van Boxtel;Jellemer Jolles

  • Long-term correlated change in personality traits in old age.

    Mathias Allemand;Daniel Zimprich;Mike Martin

  • Factorial structure and age-related psychometrics of the MIDUS personality adjective items across the life span.

    Daniel Zimprich;Mathias Allemand;Margie E. Lachman

  • Everyday Competence in Visually Impaired Older Adults: A Case for Person-Environment Perspectives

    Hans-Werner Wahl;Frank Oswald;Daniel Zimprich

  • Gender differences in level and change in cognitive functioning. Results from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam.

    Marja J. Aartsen;Mike Martin;Daniel Zimprich

  • Effects of sad mood on time-based prospective memory

    Matthias Kliegel;Theodor Jäger;Louise H. Phillips;Esther Federspiel

  • Personality, aging self-perceptions, and subjective health : A mediation model

    Caroline Moor;Daniel Zimprich;Marina Schmitt;Matthias Kliegel

  • Life-long intellectual activities mediate the predictive effect of early education on cognitive impairment in centenarians: a retrospective study

    M Kliegel;D Zimprich;C Rott

  • What do subjective cognitive complaints in persons with aging-associated cognitive decline reflect?

    Matthias Kliegel;Daniel Zimprich;Anne Eschen

  • Prospective Memory Complaints Can Be Predicted by Prospective Memory Performance in Older Adults

    Melanie Zeintl;Matthias Kliegel;Philippe Rast;Daniel Zimprich

  • Subjective cognitive complaints, memory performance, and depressive affect in old age: a change-oriented approach.

    Daniel Zimprich;Mike Martin;Matthias Kliegel

  • Predictors of cognitive complaints in older adults: a mixture regression approach

    Matthias Kliegel;Daniel Zimprich

  • Longitudinal Changes in Memory Performance and Processing Speed in Old Age abstract Keywords

    Ulrike Lemke;Daniel Zimprich

  • A Two-Level Confirmatory Factor Analysis of a Modified Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

    Daniel Zimprich;Sonja Perren;Rainer Hornung

  • A Coordinated Multi-study Analysis of the Longitudinal Association Between Handgrip Strength and Cognitive Function in Older Adults.

    Andrea R. Zammit;Andrea M. Piccinin;Emily C. Duggan;Andriy Koval

  • Openness to Experience, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence in middle-aged and old adults

    Daniel Zimprich;Mathias Allemand;Myriam Dellenbach

  • Are interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task problematic? A comment on Zamariola et al. (2018).

    Daniel Zimprich;Lisa Nusser;Olga Pollatos

Frequent Co-Authors

Mike Martin
Mike Martin University of Zurich
Matthias Kliegel
Matthias Kliegel University of Geneva
Mathias Allemand
Mathias Allemand University of Zurich
Scott M. Hofer
Scott M. Hofer University of Victoria
Hans-Werner Wahl
Hans-Werner Wahl Heidelberg University
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen University of Southern Denmark
Margie E. Lachman
Margie E. Lachman Brandeis University
Olga Pollatos
Olga Pollatos University of Ulm
Avron Spiro
Avron Spiro Boston University
Christopher Hertzog
Christopher Hertzog Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens the door to a wide range of rewarding careers, especially within counseling and therapy. Many students consider pursuing specialized roles such as Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a field with growing demand across various states.

There are unique requirements depending on your location. For example, if you’re interested in practicing in Texas, you’ll need to learn how to become a marriage and family therapist in Laredo. Those planning to settle in Nevada can find guidance on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Las Vegas. It's important to review the local licensing and education requirements before choosing your pathway.

In Kentucky, prospective therapists should research mft requirements in Lexington, while those considering Nebraska will want to understand the Lincoln mft certification requirements. Each state may require specific coursework, supervised experience, and passing relevant exams.

By examining these pathways and leveraging online psychology degrees, you’ll be well prepared to pursue a meaningful career that matches your goals and local regulations.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Zimprich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles