World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
15297
World Ranking
4150
National Ranking
2321

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
12831
World Ranking
4000
National Ranking
1818

John W. Rohrbaugh publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Rohrbaugh sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John W. Rohrbaugh D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Rohrbaugh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John W. Rohrbaugh is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their academic work spans multiple fields and subfields of study, with a focus on Neuroscience, Medicine, and Psychology. Rohrbaugh's research extends to specific areas such as Sensory Systems, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main research topics covered by Rohrbaugh's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Infrared Thermography in Medicine, and Multisensory perception and integration. These topics reflect an interdisciplinary approach, combining sensory and imaging techniques with cognitive and medical applications.

Rohrbaugh has collaborated with several researchers throughout their career. Frequent co-authors include Sara Casaccia, Erik J. Sirevaag, Mark G. Frank, Joseph A. O'Sullivan, and Lorenzo Scalise. Their collaborations suggest a research network with expertise in instrumentation, sensory measurement, and experimental methods.

Rohrbaugh's publications have appeared in venues such as the IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. This journal aligns with the technical and instrumentation focus present in their later work.

One notable recent paper is Facial Muscle Activity: High-Sensitivity Noncontact Measurement Using Laser Doppler Vibrometry, published in 2021 in the IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. This paper explores advanced measurement techniques related to sensory muscle activity using laser Doppler technology.

Best Publications

  • A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis

    Robert E. Quinn;John Rohrbaugh

  • Endogenous potentials generated in the human hippocampal formation and amygdala by infrequent events.

    Eric Halgren;Nancy K. Squires;Charles L. Wilson;John W. Rohrbaugh

  • Beta power in the EEG of alcoholics.

    Madhavi Rangaswamy;Bernice Porjesz;David B Chorlian;Kongming Wang

  • Current trends in event-related potential research

    Ray Johnson;John W. Rohrbaugh;R. Parasuraman

  • ECG Biometric Recognition: A Comparative Analysis

    I. Odinaka;Po-Hsiang Lai;A. D. Kaplan;J. A. O'Sullivan

  • Electrocortical Signs of Levels of Processing: Perceptual Analysis and Recognition Memory

    Unknown

  • 13 Sensory and Motor Aspects of the Contingent Negative Variation

    John W. Rohrbaugh;Anthony W.K. Gaillard

  • Linkage disequilibrium between the beta frequency of the human EEG and a GABAA receptor gene locus.

    Bernice Porjesz;Laura Almasy;Howard J. Edenberg;Kongming Wang

  • Brain Wave Components of the Contingent Negative Variation in Humans

    Unknown

  • Genetic differences in alcohol sensitivity and the inheritance of alcoholism risk.

    Andrew C. Heath;P. A. F. Madden;K. K. Bucholz;S. H. Dinwiddie

  • Event-related brain potentials : basic issues and applications

    John W. Rohrbaugh;R. Parasuraman;Ray Johnson

  • Model-building for group decision support: Issues and alternatives in knowledge elicitation

    Jac A.M. Vennix;David F. Andersen;George P. Richardson;John Rohrbaugh

  • Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention.

    Charles W. Eriksen;John W. Rohrbaugh

  • The subjective effects of alcohol-tobacco co-use: an ecological momentary assessment investigation.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Seungmin Jahng;Phillip K. Wood;Brandon M. Robertson

  • Quantitative trait loci analysis of human event-related brain potentials: P3 voltage

    H. Begleiter;B. Porjesz;T. Reich;Howard Edenberg

  • Frontal P300 decrements, alcohol dependence, and antisocial personality disorder

    Laura Costa;Lance Bauer;Samuel Kuperman;Bernice Porjesz

  • P300 topography of amplitude/latency correlations

    John Polich;Joel E. Alexander;Lance O. Bauer;Samuel Kuperman

  • 1 – SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY: APPLICATIONS IN POLICY FORMATION

    Kenneth R Hammond;John Rohrbaugh;Jeryl Mompower;Leonard Adelman

  • Cognition and event-related potentials. I. The relation of negative potentials and cognitive processes.

    Walter Ritter;Judith M. Ford;Anthony W. K. Gaillard;M. Russell Harter

  • Resting EEG in offspring of male alcoholics: beta frequencies

    Madhavi Rangaswamy;Bernice Porjesz;David B Chorlian;Kongming Wang

  • Linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of ERP and EEG phenotypes

    Bernice Porjesz;Henri Begleiter;Kongming Wang;Laura Almasy

  • Linkage and linkage disequilibrium of evoked EEG oscillations with CHRM2 receptor gene polymorphisms: implications for human brain dynamics and cognition.

    Kevin A. Jones;Bernice Porjesz;Laura Almasy;Laura Bierut

  • Amplitude of visual P3 event-related potential as a phenotypic marker for a predisposition to alcoholism : Preliminary results from the COGA project

    B. Porjesz;H. Begleiter;T. Reich;P. Van Eerdewegh

  • The P300 brain potential is reduced in smokers.

    Andrey Anokhin;A. B. Vedeniapin;E. J. Sirevaag;L. O. Bauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernice Porjesz
Bernice Porjesz SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Samuel Kuperman
Samuel Kuperman University of Iowa
Henri Begleiter
Henri Begleiter SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Lance O. Bauer
Lance O. Bauer University of Connecticut
Sean O'Connor
Sean O'Connor Indiana University
Joseph A. O'Sullivan
Joseph A. O'Sullivan Washington University in St. Louis
Theodore Reich
Theodore Reich Washington University in St. Louis
John Polich
John Polich Scripps Research Institute
Howard J. Edenberg
Howard J. Edenberg Indiana University
Laura Almasy
Laura Almasy University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing neuroscience in the USA opens many doors, especially with the flexibility of online education. For students eager to accelerate their studies, a bachelor degree online in 2 years allows for faster completion and quicker entry into the workforce or advanced degrees.

Neuroscience combines science, research, and technology—fields that often lead to some of the highest paying bachelor degrees entry-level. This makes it a smart choice for students focused on both passion and salary potential.

Exploring related disciplines is also crucial. By reviewing the best majors in college, you can identify other high-value options which complement neuroscience, such as data science, bioengineering, or health sciences.

Finally, affordability is a top concern. Many accredited programs offer online college courses with financial aid, making it easier to manage costs while building a strong foundation for future neuroscience careers.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Rohrbaugh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles