World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
7651
World Ranking
9393
National Ranking
4973

R. Reed Hunt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Reed Hunt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

R. Reed Hunt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Reed Hunt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. Reed Hunt is affiliated with the University of Mississippi in the United States.

Best Publications

  • Relational and item-specific information in memory

    R. Reed Hunt;Gilles O. Einstein

  • The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness

    R. Reed Hunt;Mark A. McDaniel

  • Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing.

    Gilles O. Einstein;R. Reed Hunt

  • Distinctiveness and memory.

    Robert Reed Hunt;James B. Worthen

  • The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did

    R. Reed Hunt

  • Presentation modality affects false memory.

    Rebekah E. Smith;R. Reed Hunt

  • The cost of event-based prospective memory: salient target events.

    Rebekah E. Smith;R. Reed Hunt;Jennifer C. McVay;Melissa D. McConnell

  • Affective valence and memory in depression: Dissociation of recall and fragment completion.

    Elizabeth B. Denny;R. Reed Hunt

  • Fundamentals of Cognitive Psychology

    R. Reed Hunt;Henry C. Ellis

  • Category size effects in recall: The roles of relational and individual item information.

    R. Reed Hunt;Catherine E. Seta

  • The generation effect and reality monitoring: evidence from dementia and normal aging.

    David B. Mitchell;R. Reed Hunt;Frederick A. Schmitt

  • The Concept of Distinctiveness in Memory Research

    Unknown

  • What causes the isolation effect

    R. Reed Hunt;C. A. Lamb

  • Independent effects of semantic and nonsemantic distinctiveness

    R. Reed Hunt;David B. Mitchell

  • The Role of Imagery in Memory: On Shared and Distinctive Information

    Marc Marschark;Charles L. Richman;John C. Yuille;R. Reed Hunt

  • Accessing the particular from the general: the power of distinctiveness in the context of organization.

    R. Reed Hunt;Rebekah E. Smith

  • Two contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memory

    R Reed Hunt

  • A reexamination of the role of imagery in learning and memory

    Marc Marschark;R. Reed Hunt

  • Fundamentals of human memory and cognition

    Henry C. Ellis;R. Reed Hunt

  • The influence of distinctive processing on retrieval-induced forgetting

    Rebekah E. Smith;R. Reed Hunt

  • Not one versus many, but zero versus any: Structure and function in the context of the multiple memory systems debate.

    Jeffrey P. Toth;R. Reed Hunt

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Marschark
Marc Marschark Rochester Institute of Technology
Gilles O. Einstein
Gilles O. Einstein Furman University
John Dunlosky
John Dunlosky Kent State University
Katherine A. Rawson
Katherine A. Rawson Kent State University
Michael J. Kane
Michael J. Kane University of North Carolina at Greensboro
John C. Yuille
John C. Yuille University of British Columbia
Mark A. McDaniel
Mark A. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Boyce E. Griffith
Boyce E. Griffith University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to a diverse range of online degrees and career opportunities. Many students pursue specializations such as Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), preparing for roles like Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). There are specific educational pathways and state requirements to consider, which can affect your certification process and career prospects.

For example, if you are interested in Richmond bcba education requirements, you’ll need to complete relevant coursework, gain supervised experience, and meet exam standards. In other areas, like becoming a bcba in Riverside, it’s important to understand local employer needs and certification steps, as these can differ regionally.

Additionally, knowing how to become a bcba in Sacramento or how to become a bcba in Saint Paul will help you understand unique state guidelines and higher education options. Exploring these routes can guide you toward online degrees that align with your professional goals, and can ultimately increase your competitiveness in the job market.

Whether you aim to work in clinical settings, schools, or research, researching these related programs and career pathways will enable you to make informed decisions about your future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing R. Reed Hunt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles