World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anique B. H. de Bruin

Anique B. H. de Bruin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7670 7156 349 337 117 5241

Anique B. H. de Bruin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anique B. H. de Bruin between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anique B. H. de Bruin published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2024. 27 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2024. 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 10 publications
2005 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anique B. H. de Bruin: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 4
2006 1
2007 3
2008 1
2009 0
2010 1
2011 2
2012 4
2013 13
2014 13
2015 7
2016 7
2017 13
2018 11
2019 6
2020 13
2021 11
2022 8
2023 11
2024 17
2025 10
Total 156
Download as CSV

Anique B. H. de Bruin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anique B. H. de Bruin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 117
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anique B. H. de Bruin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anique B. H. de Bruin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anique B. H. de Bruin is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their academic work spans across multiple fields with a primary focus on psychology and medicine. They have contributed extensively to subfields including developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, education, and artificial intelligence.

Their main research topics involve innovative teaching and learning methods, visual and cognitive learning processes, innovations in medical education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive learning, educational strategies and epistemologies, and online and blended learning.

Recent publications by Anique B. H. de Bruin include:

  • Changes and Adaptations: How University Students Self-Regulate Their Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Fostering effective learning strategies in higher education-A mixed-methods study., 2020, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • Synthesizing Cognitive Load and Self-regulation Theory: a Theoretical Framework and Research Agenda, 2020, Educational Psychology Review
  • Undergraduate Radiology Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Teaching and Learning Strategies, 2020, Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
  • The Relation Between Students' Effort and Monitoring Judgments During Learning: A Meta-analysis, 2020, Educational Psychology Review

Frequent co-authors working alongside Anique B. H. de Bruin include Felicitas Biwer, Wisnu Wiradhany, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, Erdem Onan, and Luotong Hui.

Their research appears in several key publication venues, with notable contributions in:

  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Medical Education
  • Medical Teacher
  • Metacognition and Learning
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education

Best Publications

  • Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children.

    Anique B.H. de Bruin;Keith W. Thiede;Gino Camp;Joshua Redford

  • Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom

    Anique B.H. de Bruin;Anique B.H. de Bruin;Tamara van Gog

  • Granularity matters: comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning

    Sanne F. E. Rovers;Geraldine Clarebout;Hans H. C. M. Savelberg;Anique B. H. de Bruin

  • Changes and Adaptations: How University Students Self-Regulate Their Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Felicitas Biwer;Wisnu Wiradhany;Mirjam Oude Egbrink;Harm Hospers

  • The role of basic science knowledge and clinical knowledge in diagnostic reasoning: a structural equation modeling approach.

    Anique B. H. de Bruin;Henk G. Schmidt;Remy M. J. P. Rikers

  • Fostering Effective Learning Strategies in Higher Education – A Mixed-Methods Study

    Felicitas Biwer;Mirjam G.A. oude Egbrink;Pauline Aalten;Anique B.H. de Bruin

  • Bridging Cognitive Load and Self-Regulated Learning Research: A complementary approach to contemporary issues in educational research

    Anique B.H. de Bruin;Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer

  • Students’ perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem-based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study

    Esther M. Bergman;Esther M. Bergman;Anique B. H. de Bruin;Andreas Herrler;Inge W. H. Verheijen

  • Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primary-school students' metacognitive judgments and calibration

    Mariëtte H. van Loon;Anique B.H. de Bruin;Anique B.H. de Bruin;Tamara van Gog;Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer

  • Synthesizing Cognitive Load and Self-regulation Theory: a Theoretical Framework and Research Agenda

    Anique B. H. de Bruin;Julian Roelle;Shana K. Carpenter;Martine Baars

  • Comfort with uncertainty: reframing our conceptions of how clinicians navigate complex clinical situations

    Jonathan S. Ilgen;Kevin W. Eva;Anique de Bruin;David A. Cook

  • Effects of training self-assessment and using assessment standards on retrospective and prospective monitoring of problem solving

    Martine Baars;Sigrid Vink;Tamara van Gog;Anique de Bruin

  • Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension.

    Jan A.A. Engelen;Samantha Bouwmeester;Anique B.H. de Bruin;Anique B.H. de Bruin;Rolf A. Zwaan

  • Deliberate practice predicts performance over time in adolescent chess players and drop-outs: a linear mixed models analysis.

    Anique B. H. de Bruin;Niels Smits;Remy M. J. P. Rikers;Henk G. Schmidt

  • Monitoring and regulation of learning in medical education: the need for predictive cues

    Anique B H de Bruin;John Dunlosky;Rodrigo B Cavalcanti

  • The impact of an online tool for monitoring and regulating learning at university: overconfidence, learning strategy, and personality

    Anique B. H. de Bruin;Ellen M. Kok;Jill Lobbestael;Andries de Grip

  • Can students evaluate their understanding of cause-and-effect relations? The effects of diagram completion on monitoring accuracy

    Mariëtte Henrica van Loon;Anique B.H. de Bruin;Tamara van Gog;Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer

  • Refutations in science texts lead to hypercorrection of misconceptions held with high confidence

    Mariëtte H. van Loon;Mariëtte H. van Loon;John Dunlosky;Tamara van Gog;Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer

  • Constructive, collaborative, contextual, and self-directed learning in surface anatomy education.

    Esther M. Bergman;Esther M. Bergman;Judith M. Sieben;Ida Smailbegovic;Anique B.H. de Bruin

  • The influence of achievement motivation and chess-specific motivation on deliberate practice.

    Anique B.H. de Bruin;Remy M.J.P. Rikers;Henk G. Schmidt

  • The Relation Between Student's Effort and Monitoring Judgments During Learning : A Meta-analysis

    Martine Baars;Lisette Wijnia;Lisette Wijnia;Anique de Bruin;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer Maastricht University
Tamara van Gog
Tamara van Gog Utrecht University
Fred Paas
Fred Paas Erasmus University Rotterdam
Remy M. J. P. Rikers
Remy M. J. P. Rikers Utrecht University
Henk G. Schmidt
Henk G. Schmidt Erasmus University Rotterdam
Glenn Regehr
Glenn Regehr University of British Columbia
Rolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier Maastricht University
Claudia M. Roebers
Claudia M. Roebers University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology means considering a variety of degrees and pathways, including specialized counseling programs. Prospective students can benefit from understanding both on-campus and online education options across different regions in the U.S.

Options range widely, such as the best counseling degree programs in Washington, D.C., which offer unique opportunities in an urban setting. If you are located farther west, review the best counseling degree programs in the West to compare academic offerings, faculty, and career services.

Midwest students should look into the best counseling program rankings in Wisconsin to find programs that align with their career goals. Those needing flexibility may prefer online counseling degrees in California, which provide high-quality coursework accessible from anywhere.

Each of these pathways prepares graduates for roles in mental health, school counseling, or therapy, and helps meet growing demand for certified counselors across the nation.

Best Scientists Citing Anique B. H. de Bruin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles