World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 74 2149 1963 44 42 312 15106
Medicine 74 19513 18310 297 284 315 15146

Werner Strik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Werner Strik between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Werner Strik published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2014. 5 of the 334 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2014. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 24 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1988 2025

334 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Werner Strik: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 2
1992 6
1993 6
1994 2
1995 4
1996 6
1997 24
1998 10
1999 7
2000 4
2001 5
2002 4
2003 3
2004 7
2005 8
2006 5
2007 16
2008 13
2009 13
2010 12
2011 15
2012 15
2013 22
2014 25
2015 21
2016 16
2017 16
2018 11
2019 6
2020 11
2021 8
2022 0
2023 2
2024 3
2025 2
Total 334
Download as CSV

Werner Strik publications per year - data summary

  • Werner Strik, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Bern, has 334 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2014, with 25 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1988 and 1989, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 38 years in the span carries no publications at all (2022).
  • The rate of publication averages 8.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.0 per year counting only the 37 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 15 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 75 publications (5.8 per year); 2001-2013: 138 publications (10.6 per year); 2014-2025: 121 publications (10.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Werner Strik publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Werner Strik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 308–317 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 312 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128 312
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Werner Strik publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 38–47 to 887+ publications.
  • Werner Strik, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Bern, records 312 publications - the 84th percentile of the discipline.
  • 84% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Werner Strik, and about 16% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 158–167 publications range, and Werner Strik ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 98–107 publications, holding 539 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 76% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 248–257 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 887 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Werner Strik D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Werner Strik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189 74
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Werner Strik D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 68 ranges running from 30–31 to 163+ D-Index.
  • Werner Strik, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Bern, records 74 D-Index - the 79th percentile of the discipline.
  • 79% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Werner Strik, and about 21% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 54–55 D-Index range, and Werner Strik ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 46–47 D-Index, holding 512 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 65% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 62–63 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Werner Strik is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and psychiatry and mental health. Their work spans diverse topics including functional brain connectivity studies, innovations in medical education, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, neurological disorders and treatments, and schizophrenia research and treatment.

Strik's recent publications demonstrate a focus on psychomotor abnormalities and clinical educational methods. Some notable recent papers include:

  • Movement disorder and sensorimotor abnormalities in schizophrenia and other psychoses - European consensus on assessment and perspectives, 2020, European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Working with entrustable professional activities in clinical education in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review, 2021, BMC Medical Education
  • Anatomical integrity within the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus and semantic processing deficits in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, 2020, Schizophrenia Research
  • Inhibitory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Treat Psychomotor Slowing: A Transdiagnostic, Mechanism-Based Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial, 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
  • The polysemous concepts of psychomotricity and catatonia: A European multi-consensus perspective, 2021, European Neuropsychopharmacology

Their research outputs have appeared in several specialized venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern)
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • BMC Medical Education
  • Advances in Medical Education and Practice

Collaborations form a significant part of Strik's research network. Frequently co-authoring with other researchers, key collaborators include Sebastian Walther, Katharina Stegmayer, Roland Wiest, Andrea Federspiel, and Thomas Dierks.

Werner Strik's interdisciplinary approach combines clinical and neuroimaging techniques to explore neurological and psychiatric conditions, emphasizing schizophrenia spectrum disorders and psychomotor symptoms. Their work further extends into medical education, particularly regarding clinical training and assessment methods.

Best Publications

  • Pathways That Make Voices: White Matter Changes in Auditory Hallucinations

    Daniela Hubl;Thomas Koenig;Werner Strik;Andrea Federspiel

  • Brain electric microstates and momentary conscious mind states as building blocks of spontaneous thinking : I. Visual imagery and abstract thoughts

    Dietrich Lehmann;Werner Strik;B. Henggeler;Thomas Koenig

  • Motor Symptoms and Schizophrenia

    Sebastian Walther;Werner Strik

  • Functional imbalance of visual pathways indicates alternative face processing strategies in autism

    D. Hubl;S. Bolte;S. Feineis-Matthews;H. Lanfermann

  • Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation.

    W.K Strik;A.J Fallgatter;D Brandeis;R.D Pascual-Marqui

  • BOLD correlates of EEG alpha phase-locking and the fMRI default mode network.

    Kay Jann;Thomas Dierks;Chris Boesch;Mara Kottlow

  • Structural plasticity in the language system related to increased second language proficiency.

    Maria Stein;Andrea Federspiel;Thomas Koenig;Miranka Wirth

  • EEG microstates associated with salience and frontoparietal networks in frontotemporal dementia, schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease.

    Keiichiro Nishida;Keiichiro Nishida;Yosuke Morishima;Masafumi Yoshimura;Toshiaki Isotani

  • Altered response control and anterior cingulate function in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder boys

    Andreas J Fallgatter;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Juergen Seifert;Werner Konrad Strik

  • The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control

    Andreas J. Fallgatter;Werner K. Strik

  • Adaptive segmentation of spontaneous EEG map series into spatially defined microstates

    J. Wackermann;D. Lehmann;C.M. Michel;W.K. Strik

  • The effect of appraisal level on processing of emotional prosody in meaningless speech.

    Dominik R. Bach;Didier Grandjean;David Sander;Marcus Herdener;Marcus Herdener

  • Loss of functional hemispheric asymmetry in Alzheimer's dementia assessed with near-infrared spectroscopy.

    A.J Fallgatter;M Roesler;L Sitzmann;A Heidrich

  • Brain connectivity at different time-scales measured with EEG

    T Koenig;D Studer;D Hubl;L Melie

  • Resting-state EEG in schizophrenia: Auditory verbal hallucinations are related to shortening of specific microstates

    J. Kindler;D. Hubl;W.K. Strik;T. Dierks

  • Frontal brain activation during the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test assessed with two-channel near-infrared spectroscopy

    A. J. Fallgatter;Werner K. Strik

  • Face-specific event-related potential in humans is independent from facial expression.

    Martin J Herrmann;Derlis Aranda;Heiner Ellgring;Thomas J Mueller

  • A robust assessment of the NoGo-anteriorisation of P300 microstates in a cued Continuous Performance Test.

    A J Fallgatter;D Brandeis;W K Strik

  • Native EEG and treatment effects in neuroleptic-naïve schizophrenic patients: time and frequency domain approaches.

    Mitsuru Kikuchi;Thomas Koenig;Yuji Wada;Masato Higashima

  • Reduced Frontal Functional Asymmetry in Schizophrenia During a Cued Continuous Performance Test Assessed With Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

    Andreas J. Fallgatter;Werner K. Strik

Frequent Co-Authors

Sebastian Walther
Sebastian Walther University of Bern
Thomas Dierks
Thomas Dierks University of Bern
Andrea Federspiel
Andrea Federspiel University of Bern
Thomas Koenig
Thomas Koenig University of Bern
Stephan Bohlhalter
Stephan Bohlhalter University of Bern
Andreas J. Fallgatter
Andreas J. Fallgatter University of Tübingen
René M. Müri
René M. Müri University of Bern
Miranka Wirth
Miranka Wirth German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Dietrich Lehmann
Dietrich Lehmann University of Zurich
Erich Seifritz
Erich Seifritz University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience offers diverse career opportunities, and understanding related online options can help plan your future. Students interested in high income potential may be surprised to learn that some of the most profitable degrees include STEM fields closely connected to neuroscience, like biomedical engineering and computer science.

If cost is a concern, you can explore an online college that accepts fafsa to maximize affordability and access federal financial aid. Those in search of skill-focused programs might find value in online courses with certificates in data analysis, cognitive psychology, or healthcare—which can all serve as stepping stones into neuroscience careers.

Lastly, if you want to balance ambition with manageability, explore what is the easiest degree to get online as a way to complement your neuroscience focus or acquire additional credentials. The flexibility of online education makes it easier to tailor your academic and professional journey to fit your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Werner Strik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles