World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9422 8805 411 397 114 6918

Jill Lobbestael publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jill Lobbestael between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jill Lobbestael published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2015. 4 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2015. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 8 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jill Lobbestael: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 3
2008 5
2009 5
2010 5
2011 5
2012 6
2013 4
2014 8
2015 15
2016 9
2017 7
2018 8
2019 1
2020 8
2021 13
2022 6
2023 10
2024 7
2025 3
2026 1
Total 130
Download as CSV

Jill Lobbestael publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill Lobbestael sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 114
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jill Lobbestael D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill Lobbestael sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jill Lobbestael is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and specializes in psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology. Their research covers a range of topics centered on personality disorders, psychopathology, and mental health, often exploring cognitive and social psychological aspects.

The main fields of study for Lobbestael include:

  • Psychology

Within psychology, their work mainly addresses these subfields:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

Research topics frequently examined by Lobbestael cover a blend of personality, psychological disorders, and developmental aspects:

  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research

Lobbestael's recent representative publications include:

  • "Early maladaptive schemas and their relation to personality disorders: A correlational examination in a clinical population," 2020, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • "Executive Functioning in 60+ Autistic Males: The Discrepancy Between Experienced Challenges and Cognitive Performance," 2020, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • "Early Maladaptive Schemas and Schema Modes in clinical disorders: A systematic review," 2023, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • "The hot and the cold in destructive leadership: Modeling the role of arousal in explaining leader antecedents and follower consequences of abusive supervision versus exploitative leadership," 2023, Organizational Psychology Review
  • "Modulating Behavioural and Self-Reported Aggression with Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: A Literature Review," 2022, Brain Sciences

The researcher has published extensively in journals such as:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • Current Psychiatry Reports
  • Brain Sciences
  • Journal of Personality Assessment

Lobbestael frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Frenk Peeters
  • Martijn W. van Teffelen
  • Marisol J. Voncken
  • Vanessa Lea Freund
  • Nicole Geschwind

Best Publications

  • Inter‐rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Axis I disorders (SCID I) and Axis II disorders (SCID II).

    Jill Lobbestael;Maartje Leurgans;Arnoud Arntz

  • A validation study of the Dutch Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form: Factor structure, reliability, and known-groups validity☆

    Brett D. Thombs;David P. Bernstein;Jill Lobbestael;Arnoud Arntz

  • Minimization of childhood maltreatment is common and consequential: results from a large, multinational sample using the childhood trauma questionnaire

    Kai MacDonald;Michael L. Thomas;Andres F. Sciolla;Beacher Schneider

  • Disentangling the Relationship Between Different Types of Childhood Maltreatment and Personality Disorders

    Jill Lobbestael;Arnoud Arntz;David P. Bernstein

  • Reliability and validity of the short Schema Mode Inventory (SMI).

    Jill Lobbestael;Michiel van Vreeswijk;Philip Spinhoven;Erik Schouten

  • Early maladaptive schemas in depressed patients: Stability and relation with depressive symptoms over the course of treatment

    Fritz Renner;Jill Lobbestael;Frenk Peeters;Arnoud Arntz

  • An empirical test of schema mode conceptualizations in personality disorders.

    Jill Lobbestael;Michiel F. Van Vreeswijk;Arnoud Arntz

  • Schema modes and childhood abuse in borderline and antisocial personality disorders.

    Jill Lobbestael;Arnoud Arntz;Simkje Sieswerda

  • Sexuality in Adolescent Boys with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Self-Reported Behaviours and Attitudes.

    Jeroen Dewinter;Robert Vermeiren;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Jill Lobbestael

  • How to push someone's buttons: A comparison of four anger-induction methods.

    Jill Lobbestael;Arnoud Arntz;Reinout W. Wiers

  • Schema therapy for chronic depression: Results of a multiple single case series.

    Fritz Renner;Arnoud Arntz;Frenk P.M.L. Peeters;Jill Lobbestael

  • Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 2007, number 3 Shedding light on schema modes: a clarification of the mode concept and its current research status

    Jill Lobbestael;Michiel van Vreeswijk;Arnoud Arntz

  • The relationship between adult reactive and proactive aggression, hostile interpretation bias, and antisocial personality disorder.

    Jill Lobbestael;Maaike Cima;Arnoud Arntz

  • Reducing proactive aggression through non-invasive brain stimulation

    Franziska Emmerling Dambacher;Teresa Schuhmann;Jill Lobbestael;Arnoud Arntz;Arnoud Arntz

  • The mediating role of early maladaptive schemas in the relation between quality of attachment relationships and symptoms of depression in adolescents

    Jeffrey Roelofs;Chris Lee;Tamara Ruijten;Jill Lobbestael

  • The role of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in self-reported and laboratory aggression and testosterone reactivity

    Jill Lobbestael;Roy F. Baumeister;Tina Fiebig;Lisa A. Eckel

  • Out of control Evidence for anterior insula involvement in motor impulsivity and reactive aggression

    Franziska Emmerling Dambacher;Alexander Sack;Jill Lobbestael;Arnoud Arntz

  • The influence of stress on social cognition in patients with borderline personality disorder

    Janneke W.M. Deckers;Jill Lobbestael;Guido A. van Wingen;Roy P.C. Kessels;Roy P.C. Kessels

  • Effects of induced anger in patients with antisocial personality disorder

    J. Lobbestael;A.R. Arntz;M.J. Cima;F. Chakhssi

  • The impact of an online tool for monitoring and regulating learning at university: overconfidence, learning strategy, and personality

    Anique B. H. de Bruin;Ellen M. Kok;Jill Lobbestael;Andries de Grip

  • Identifying cognitive predictors of reactive and proactive aggression

    Suzanne Brugman;Jill Lobbestael;Arnoud Arntz;Maaike Cima

Frequent Co-Authors

Arnoud Arntz
Arnoud Arntz University of Amsterdam
Frenk Peeters
Frenk Peeters Maastricht University
Alexander T. Sack
Alexander T. Sack Maastricht University
Marcus J.H. Huibers
Marcus J.H. Huibers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David P. Bernstein
David P. Bernstein Maastricht University
Ad de Jongh
Ad de Jongh Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam
Jeffrey Roelofs
Jeffrey Roelofs Maastricht University
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Hans Knoop
Hans Knoop Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Gijs Bleijenberg
Gijs Bleijenberg Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to diverse online degrees that can lead to various career pathways. Many universities across the USA offer flexible online psychology programs, enabling students to study from anywhere while balancing work and other commitments. When considering your options, it's important to examine program quality and regional reputation.

For instance, students residing in or near Nebraska can refer to the top psychology programs in Nebraska for insights into leading local online degrees. Similarly, those interested in urban environments may want to review the best psychology program rankings in New York City.

Prospective students in New Jersey should check the best psychology degree programs ranking in Newark, while those in New England can explore the best psychology program rankings in New Hampshire.

Online psychology degrees can lead to careers in counseling, human resources, research, social work, and more. Exploring accredited programs and regional options ensures you get the right training and credentials to advance in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Jill Lobbestael

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles