World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
6051
World Ranking
8881
National Ranking
388

Marko Jelicic publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marko Jelicic sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marko Jelicic D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marko Jelicic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marko Jelicic is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience, with a significant focus on cognitive processes, mental health, and forensic applications.

Their key fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Within these broader fields, subfields of research include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

The scientist's work covers various interconnected topics, notably:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Marko Jelicic has contributed to multiple recent papers, including:

  • A Critical Review of Case Studies on Dissociative Amnesia (2021), published in Clinical Psychological Science
  • Do You Know People Who Feign? Proxy Respondents About Feigned Symptoms (2020), published in Psychological Injury and Law
  • Believing in Dissociative Amnesia Relates to Claiming It: A Survey of People's Experiences and Beliefs About Dissociative Amnesia (2021), published in Memory
  • The Iatrogenic Power of Labeling Medically Unexplained Symptoms: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of "Diagnosis Threat" in Mild Head Injury (2020), published in Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice
  • An Experimental Investigation of the Misinformation Effect in Crime-Related Amnesia Claims (2020), published in Applied Cognitive Psychology

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Henry Otgaar
  • Ivan Mangiulli
  • Lawrence Patihis
  • Mark L. Howe
  • Olivier Dodier

Research outputs often appear in specialized publication venues such as:

  • Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice
  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Psychological Injury and Law
  • Memory

Best Publications

  • Introducing the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST): a quick and non-invasive approach to elicit robust autonomic and glucocorticoid stress responses.

    Tom Smeets;Sandra Cornelisse;Conny W.E.M. Quaedflieg;Thomas Meyer

  • Self-reported trauma, cortisol levels, and aggression in psychopathic and non-psychopathic prison inmates.

    Maaike Cima;Tom Smeets;Marko Jelicic

  • Assessment of preoperative anxiety: comparison of measures in patients awaiting surgery for breast cancer

    Unknown

  • Subjective sleep problems in later life as predictors of cognitive decline. Report from the Maastricht Ageing Study (MAAS)

    Marko Jelicic;Hans Bosma;Rudolf W. H. M. Ponds;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel

  • Personality, chronic medical morbidity, and health-related quality of life among older persons.

    Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen;Marko Jelicic;Johan Ormel

  • Memory : systems, process, or function?

    Jonathan K. Foster;Marko Jelicic

  • Engaged lifestyle and cognitive function in middle and old-aged, non-demented persons: a reciprocal association?

    Hans Bosma;Martin P J van Boxtel;R W H M Ponds;Marko Jelicic

  • The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Alfons van Impelen;Harald Merckelbach;Marko Jelicic;Thomas Merten

  • Context-dependent enhancement of declarative memory performance following acute psychosocial stress

    T. Smeets;T.M. Giesbrecht;M. Jelicic;H.L.G.J. Merckelbach

  • Fantasy proneness, but not self-reported trauma is related to DRM performance of women reporting recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.

    Elke Geraerts;Elke Smeets;Marko Jelicic;Jaap van Heerden

  • The effect of acute stress on memory depends on word valence

    Tom Smeets;Marko Jelicic;Harald Merckelbach

  • Acute dissociation after 1 night of sleep loss.

    Timo Giesbrecht;Tom Smeets;Jimmie Leppink;Marko Jelicic

  • Does migraine headache affect cognitive function in the elderly? Report from the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS).

    Marko Jelicic;Martin P.J. Van Boxtel;Peter J. Houx;Jelle Jolles

  • Implicit memory in Alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis.

    Nachshon Meiran;Marko Jelicic

  • Poor working memory predicts false memories

    Maarten J.V. Peters;Marko Jelicic;Hilde Verbeek;Harald Merckelbach

  • Implicit memory for words presented during anaesthesia

    Marko Jelicic;Benno Bonke;Gezinus Wolters;R. Hans Phaf

  • Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Recovered-Memory Experiences of Childhood Sexual Abuse:

    Elke Geraerts;D. Stephen Lindsay;Harald Merckelbach;Marko Jelicic

  • The Reality of Recovered Memories Corroborating Continuous and Discontinuous Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse

    Elke Geraerts;Jonathan W. Schooler;Harald Merckelbach;Marko Jelicic

  • Long term consequences of suppression of intrusive anxious thoughts and repressive coping

    Elke Geraerts;Harald Merckelbach;Marko Jelicic;Elke Smeets

  • How to change implicit drug use-related cognitions in prevention: a transdisciplinary integration of findings from experimental psychopathology, social cognition, memory, and experimental learning psychology.

    Reinout W. Wiers;Peter J. de Jong;Remco Havermans;Marko Jelicic

  • Effects of Ageing on Different Explicit and Implicit Memory Tasks

    Marko Jelicic

Frequent Co-Authors

Harald Merckelbach
Harald Merckelbach Maastricht University
Tom Smeets
Tom Smeets Tilburg University
Lorraine Hope
Lorraine Hope University of Portsmouth
Jelle Jolles
Jelle Jolles Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Hans Bosma
Hans Bosma Maastricht University
Jonathan W. Schooler
Jonathan W. Schooler University of California, Santa Barbara
Martin P.J. van Boxtel
Martin P.J. van Boxtel Maastricht University
Corine de Ruiter
Corine de Ruiter Maastricht University
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam
Dorly J. H. Deeg
Dorly J. H. Deeg University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of career pathways, especially in the field of mental health and counseling. Many students consider online psychology degrees for their flexibility, accessibility, and recognition by licensing boards across the U.S. However, becoming a practicing therapist requires more than just a degree. Each state and city sets its own requirements for licensure, including supervised clinical hours, specific coursework, and passing standardized exams.

For example, the licensed therapist requirements in Las Vegas have unique educational and internship standards. Similarly, those interested in practicing in Kentucky should review the Lexington licensed therapist requirements to ensure compliance. Nebraska candidates will need to follow the Lincoln licensed therapist requirements, while California-based students must adhere to local guidelines such as how to become a licensed therapist in Long Beach.

Before choosing an online degree or mapping out your career, take time to research your intended destination’s laws. This ensures your education aligns with the qualifications needed for your chosen role and location.

Best Scientists Citing Marko Jelicic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles