World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
7672
World Ranking
10053
National Ranking
5299

Stephen E. Finn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen E. Finn sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen E. Finn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen E. Finn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Bruno Klopfer Award, Society for Personality Assessment
  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Stephen E. Finn is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with notable contributions in clinical psychology, applied psychology, and social psychology. Additional subfields of study include physiology and transportation.

Their scientific work spans several topics, notably psychological testing and assessment, psychotherapy techniques and applications, and personality disorders and psychopathology. Other areas of interest include physical activity and health, urban transport and accessibility, health disparities and outcomes, and academic and historical perspectives in psychology.

Stephen E. Finn has authored multiple scholarly articles. Recent publications include:

  • "Getting Ireland Active"-Application of a Systems Approach to Increase Physical Activity in Ireland Using the GAPPA Framework, 2021, Journal of Physical Activity and Health
  • The Rorschach As a Window Into Past Traumas During Therapeutic Assessment, 2020, Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach
  • The Thurston Cradock Test of Shame as a Crucial "Empathy Magnifier", 2020, Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach
  • Therapeutic Assessment With Adults, 2023, PsycTHERAPY Dataset
  • Ultra-Brief Therapeutic Assessment with Three Chinese Adult Clients: A Case-Based Time-Series Pilot Study, 2024, Journal of Personality Assessment

Their frequent co-authors include Joseph John Murphy, Fiona Mansergh, Marie Murphy, Niamh Murphy, and Benny Cullen.

Stephen E. Finn has published frequently in venues such as the Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach, Journal of Physical Activity and Health, PsycTHERAPY Dataset, Journal of Personality Assessment, and Psychoanalytic Psychology.

Cited awards received by Stephen E. Finn include the Bruno Klopfer Award from the Society for Personality Assessment in 2011 and the designation of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1998.

Best Publications

  • Psychological Testing and Psychological Assessment: A Review of Evidence and Issues.

    Gregory J. Meyer;Stephen E. Finn;Lorraine D. Eyde;Gary G. Kay

  • Information-gathering and therapeutic models of assessment: Complementary paradigms.

    Stephen E. Finn;Mary E. Tonsager

  • In Our Clients' Shoes: Theory and Techniques of Therapeutic Assessment

    Stephen Edward. Finn

  • Therapeutic effects of providing MMPI-2 test feedback to college students awaiting therapy.

    Stephen E. Finn;Mary E. Tonsager

  • Manual for Using the MMPI-2 as a Therapeutic Intervention

    Stephen Edward Finn

  • Stability of personality self-ratings over 30 years: evidence for an age/cohort interaction.

    Stephen E. Finn

  • Inability to predict cardiovascular disease from hostility scores or MMPI items related to type A behavior.

    Gloria R. Leon;Stephen E. Finn;David Murray;John M. Bailey

  • Classification of personality traits.

    Arnold H. Buss;Stephen E. Finn

  • Binge eating and associated habit patterns within college student and identified bulimic populations

    Gloria R. Leon;B A Kathleen Carroll;B A Benita Chernyk;Stephen Finn

  • SUBJECTIVE UTILITY RATINGS OF NEUROLEPTICS IN TREATING SCHIZOPHRENIA

    Stephen E. Finn;Stephen E. Finn;Stephen E. Finn;J. Michael Bailey;J. Michael Bailey;J. Michael Bailey;Robert T. Schultz;Robert T. Schultz;Robert T. Schultz;Raymond Faber;Raymond Faber;Raymond Faber

  • Assessment feedback integrating MMPI-2 and Rorschach findings.

    Stephen E. Finn

  • Eating disorders and sexual abuse: Lack of confirmation for a clinical hypothesis

    Stephen E. Finn;B A Marilyn Hartman;Gloria R. Leon;Loralie Lawson

  • Collaborative / Therapeutic Assessment: A Casebook and Guide

    Stephen Edward. Finn;Constance T. Fischer;Leonard Handler

  • Therapeutic Assessment with children: a pilot study of treatment acceptability and outcome.

    Deborah J Tharinger;Stephen E Finn;Lauren Gentry;Amy Hamilton

  • Sex-Role Identity, Sex-Role Behavior, And Satisfaction In Heterosexual, Lesbian, And Gay Male Couples

    Mona Cardell;Stephen Finn;Jeanne Marecek

  • Empirical support for psychological assessment in clinical health care settings.

    Tom W. Kubiszyn;Gregory J. Meyer;Stephen E. Finn;Lorraine D. Eyde

  • Rorschach correlates of sexual abuse: trauma content and aggression indexes.

    Jan H. Kamphuis;Susana L. Kugeares;Stephen E. Finn

  • Problems and limitations in using psychological assessment in the contemporary health care delivery system.

    Elena J. Eisman;Robert R. Dies;Stephen E. Finn;Lorraine D. Eyde

  • Assessment Feedback With Parents and Preadolescent Children: A Collaborative Approach

    Deborah J. Tharinger;Stephen E. Finn;Brooke Hersh;Alison Wilkinson

  • Therapeutic assessment of a man with "ADD".

    Stephen E. Finn

  • "Inability to predict cardiovascular disease from hostility scores or MMPI items related to Type A behavior": Correction to Leon et al.

    Gloria R. Leon;Stephen E. Finn;David Murray;John M. Bailey

Frequent Co-Authors

Gloria R. Leon
Gloria R. Leon University of Minnesota
Jan H. Kamphuis
Jan H. Kamphuis University of Amsterdam
Gregory J. Meyer
Gregory J. Meyer University of Toledo
Jeanne Marecek
Jeanne Marecek Swarthmore College
J. Michael Bailey
J. Michael Bailey Northwestern University
Robert T. Schultz
Robert T. Schultz Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
David M. Murray
David M. Murray National Institutes of Health
Justin D. Smith
Justin D. Smith University of Utah
Geoffrey M. Reed
Geoffrey M. Reed Columbia University
Ronald J. Prineas
Ronald J. Prineas Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to diverse career pathways across the country. Students can specialize in areas like clinical psychology, counseling, or organizational psychology. Popular job options include mental health counselor, behavioral analyst, or human resources specialist. Many online programs also offer flexible schedules to accommodate working professionals.

As you consider your options, it’s helpful to review program rankings by region. For those on the West Coast, the top psychology programs in Orange offer a strong foundation for both academic and applied careers. Similarly, those in Florida may want to explore the top psychology degrees in Orlando, which are known for their innovative coursework and faculty expertise.

The Southwest has its own notable options, including the best psychology degree programs ranking in Phoenix, offering a variety of concentrations and flexible learning formats. In the Southeast, students can look into the top psychology programs in Raleigh, many of which are renowned for research and clinical training.

Choosing the right program depends on your career aspirations, location, and preferred learning style. Online degrees make it easier than ever to access quality education and prepare for a rewarding future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen E. Finn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles