What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Law
- The Internet
- Social science
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Internet privacy, World Wide Web, Context, Privacy policy and Profiling.
Her Internet privacy research integrates issues from Personally identifiable information and Access control.
Her World Wide Web research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Privacy law and Obfuscation.
She interconnects Design technology, Social issues, Information technology and Game design in the investigation of issues within Context.
Her study explores the link between Privacy policy and topics such as Contextual integrity that cross with problems in Tracking, Information practices, Data integrity and Public policy.
As a part of the same scientific study, she usually deals with the Right to privacy, concentrating on Information and Communications Technology and frequently concerns with Politics.
Her most cited work include:
- Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life (1240 citations)
- Privacy as contextual integrity (957 citations)
- Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue (504 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Helen Nissenbaum mainly focuses on Internet privacy, Computer security, Privacy policy, Public relations and Politics.
The Internet privacy study combines topics in areas such as Context, Information technology and Personally identifiable information.
Helen Nissenbaum combines subjects such as Referent and National security with her study of Computer security.
She works mostly in the field of Privacy policy, limiting it down to topics relating to Government and, in certain cases, Ambiguity, Ingenuity, Vignette, Download and Corporate governance.
Her Public relations study which covers Legal aspects of computing that intersects with Privacy law and Law and economics.
Her Politics research includes themes of Game design and World Wide Web.
She most often published in these fields:
- Internet privacy (57.65%)
- Computer security (28.24%)
- Privacy policy (24.12%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Internet privacy (57.65%)
- Privacy policy (24.12%)
- Contextual integrity (9.41%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her primary scientific interests are in Internet privacy, Privacy policy, Contextual integrity, Government and Empirical research.
Her Internet privacy study combines topics in areas such as Autonomy, Information technology, Behavioral targeting and Set.
The various areas that Helen Nissenbaum examines in her Behavioral targeting study include Digital media, Persuasion, Coercion and Covert.
Her Privacy policy research is classified as research in Computer security.
Her research in Contextual integrity intersects with topics in Crowdsourcing and Information sensitivity.
Her study in Government is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Download, Corporate governance, Agency, Content analysis and Personally identifiable information.
Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- Respecting Context to Protect Privacy: Why Meaning Matters. (32 citations)
- Online Manipulation: Hidden Influences in a Digital World (26 citations)
- Online Manipulation: Hidden Influences in a Digital World (26 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- The Internet
- Social science
Helen Nissenbaum spends much of her time researching Internet privacy, Privacy policy, Autonomy, Behavioral targeting and Information technology.
Her Internet privacy research includes elements of Semantics and Metaphor.
Her study on Privacy policy is covered under Computer security.
Her studies deal with areas such as Digital media, Subversion, Persuasion, Coercion and Covert as well as Autonomy.
Her research integrates issues of Salient and Harm in her study of Behavioral targeting.
Helen Nissenbaum interconnects Crowdsourcing, Data collection and Audit in the investigation of issues within Contextual integrity.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
