World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 88 785 699 416 364 231 24935

Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2023. 30 of the 280 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2023. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 15 publications
1996 2025

280 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 2
1998 7
1999 2
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 3
2004 1
2005 7
2006 7
2007 5
2008 6
2009 11
2010 12
2011 15
2012 12
2013 20
2014 18
2015 11
2016 13
2017 9
2018 9
2019 10
2020 16
2021 14
2022 10
2023 22
2024 15
2025 15
Total 280
Download as CSV

Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 227–236 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 231 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74 231
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50 88
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on Molecular Biology. Additional areas of study include Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cell Biology, Oncology, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their work addresses a variety of topics related to cellular function and development. Key research themes include:

  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Publications by Hadjantonakis are frequently found in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Developmental Cell, eLife, Nature Cell Biology, and Development. They have contributed extensively to the literature, with multiple papers in these journals.

Recent papers include:

  • Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition, 2020, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
  • TGF-β orchestrates fibrogenic and developmental EMTs via the RAS effector RREB1, 2020, Nature
  • Integration of spatial and single-cell transcriptomic data elucidates mouse organogenesis, 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • Mouse gastrulation: Coordination of tissue patterning, specification and diversification of cell fate, 2020, Mechanisms of Development
  • RNA polymerase II dynamics shape enhancer-promoter interactions, 2023, Nature Genetics

Hadjantonakis has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Vidur Garg (14 collaborations)
  • Ying-Yi Kuo (13 collaborations)
  • Joan Massagué (10 collaborations)
  • Abderhman Abuhashem (9 collaborations)
  • Sonja Nowotschin (9 collaborations)

The body of Hadjantonakis's work contributes to molecular understanding in stem cell biology, genomic regulation, and cancer biology. The publications exhibit a broad integration of developmental biology techniques and genomic approaches, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to research questions.

Best Publications

  • Promotion of Trophoblast Stem Cell Proliferation by FGF4

    Satoshi Tanaka;Tilo Kunath;Anna Katerina Hadjantonakis;Andras Nagy

  • Generating green fluorescent mice by germline transmission of green fluorescent ES cells

    Anna Katerina Hadjantonakis;Marina Gertsenstein;Masahito Ikawa;Masaru Okabe

  • Mice lacking both presenilin genes exhibit early embryonic patterning defects.

    Dorit B. Donoviel;Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis;Masaki Ikeda;Hui Zheng

  • Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst.

    Berenika Plusa;Anna Piliszek;Stephen Frankenberg;Stephen Frankenberg;Jérôme Artus

  • The orderly allocation of mesodermal cells to the extraembryonic structures and the anteroposterior axis during gastrulation of the mouse embryo

    Simon J. Kinder;Tania E. Tsang;Gabriel A. Quinlan;Anna Katerina Hadjantonakis

  • Symmetry breaking, germ layer specification and axial organisation in aggregates of mouse embryonic stem cells

    Susanne C. van den Brink;Peter Baillie-Johnson;Tina Balayo;Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis

  • The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages.

    Gloria S. Kwon;Manuel Viotti;Manuel Viotti;Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis

  • Tbr2 Directs Conversion of Radial Glia into Basal Precursors and Guides Neuronal Amplification by Indirect Neurogenesis in the Developing Neocortex

    Alessandro Sessa;Chai an Mao;Anna Katerina Hadjantonakis;William H. Klein

  • A sensitive and bright single-cell resolution live imaging reporter of Wnt/ß-catenin signaling in the mouse

    Anna Ferrer-Vaquer;Anna Piliszek;Guangnan Tian;Robert J Aho

  • TGF-β orchestrates fibrogenic and developmental EMTs via the RAS effector RREB1.

    Jie Su;Sophie M. Morgani;Charles J. David;Charles J. David;Qiong Wang;Qiong Wang

  • The emergent landscape of the mouse gut endoderm at single-cell resolution.

    Sonja Nowotschin;Manu Setty;Ying-Yi Kuo;Vincent Liu

  • Distinct functions for Wnt/β-catenin in hair follicle stem cell proliferation and survival and interfollicular epidermal homeostasis

    Yeon Sook Choi;Yuhang Zhang;Yuhang Zhang;Mingang Xu;Yongguang Yang

  • Cell-to-cell expression variability followed by signal reinforcement progressively segregates early mouse lineages

    Yusuke Ohnishi;Wolfgang Huber;Akiko Tsumura;Minjung Kang

  • Downregulation of Par3 and aPKC function directs cells towards the ICM in the preimplantation mouse embryo

    Berenika Plusa;Stephen Frankenberg;Andrew Chalmers;Andrew Chalmers;Anna Katerina Hadjantonakis

  • Embryonic stem cells and mice expressing different GFP variants for multiple non-invasive reporter usage within a single animal

    Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis;Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis;Suzanne Macmaster;András D Nagy;András D Nagy

  • FGF4 is required for lineage restriction and salt-and-pepper distribution of primitive endoderm factors but not their initial expression in the mouse

    Minjung Kang;Anna Piliszek;Jérôme Artus;Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis

  • Dynamic in vivo imaging and cell tracking using a histone fluorescent protein fusion in mice

    Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis;Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis;Virginia E Papaioannou

  • Crucial role for DNA ligase III in mitochondria but not in Xrcc1-dependent repair

    Deniz Simsek;Deniz Simsek;Amy Furda;Yankun Gao;Jérôme Artus

  • Dissecting the role of N-myc in development using a single targeting vector to generate a series of alleles

    A. Nagy;C. Moens;E. Ivanyi;J. Pawling

Frequent Co-Authors

Andras Nagy
Andras Nagy Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Virginia E. Papaioannou
Virginia E. Papaioannou Columbia University Medical Center
Jennifer Nichols
Jennifer Nichols University of Cambridge
Pamela A. Hoodless
Pamela A. Hoodless University of British Columbia
Joan Massagué
Joan Massagué Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Alfonso Martinez Arias
Alfonso Martinez Arias University of Cambridge
Dana Pe'er
Dana Pe'er Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Deanna M. Church
Deanna M. Church National Institutes of Health
Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz California Institute of Technology
William H. Klein
William H. Klein The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology opens the door to many professional opportunities, both within laboratory science and across interdisciplinary fields. Those interested in expanding their expertise or changing focus can explore several online graduate options that complement a molecular biology background.

For example, an online masters in social work can prepare science graduates for roles in public health advocacy, policy development, or community outreach—critical areas for science communication and health education.

Graduates keen on the psychological aspects of research may consider a 1 year master's in psychology online to build skills in behavioral research or patient interaction, ideal for careers in health sciences or bioethics.

Pursuing an online masters mental health counseling can lead to roles supporting mental well-being in scientific workplaces or helping patients cope with complex diagnoses.

Those curious about legal and investigative careers may ask, what can i do with a masters in forensic psychology? With this knowledge, molecular biologists can transition to roles in forensic analysis, criminal investigations, or expert testimony involving scientific evidence.

Best Scientists Citing Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles