World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
6835
World Ranking
8238
National Ranking
815

Tim J. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim J. Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 145 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tim J. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim J. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tim J. Smith is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interconnected fields with a focus on psychology and neuroscience, particularly within cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

The subfields covered in their research are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Education
  • Social Psychology
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Tim J. Smith's research addresses key topics such as:

  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Smith include:

  • Culture modulates face scanning during dyadic social interactions (2020), Scientific Reports
  • Cultural differences in mutual gaze during face-to-face interactions: A dual head-mounted eye-tracking study (2021), Visual Cognition
  • Longitudinal touchscreen use across early development is associated with faster exogenous and reduced endogenous attention control (2021), Scientific Reports
  • Saccade dysmetria indicates attenuated visual exploration in autism spectrum disorder (2020), Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Infants' gaze exhibits a fractal structure that varies by age and stimulus salience (2020), Scientific Reports

Smith has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Projections
  • JAMA Pediatrics
  • Infant Behavior and Development

Frequent collaborators in Smith's research include:

  • Rachael Bedford
  • Mitsuhiko Ishikawa
  • Atsushi Senju
  • Ana Maria Portugal
  • Jennifer X. Haensel

Best Publications

  • Clustering of Gaze During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion

    Parag K. Mital;Tim J. Smith;Robin L. Hill;John M. Henderson

  • ECHOES: An intelligent serious game for fostering social communication in children with autism

    Sara Bernardini;Kaka Porayska-Pomsta;Tim J. Smith

  • Daily touchscreen use in infants and toddlers is associated with reduced sleep and delayed sleep onset

    Celeste H.M. Cheung;Rachael Bedford;Irati R. Saez De Urabain;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • CRISP: A Computational Model of Fixation Durations in Scene Viewing

    Antje Nuthmann;Tim J. Smith;Ralf Engbert;John M. Henderson

  • Eye Movements and Visual Encoding During Scene Perception

    Keith Rayner;Tim J. Smith;George L. Malcolm;John M. Henderson

  • Edit Blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes.

    Tim J. Smith;John M. Henderson

  • Toddlers’ Fine Motor Milestone Achievement Is Associated with Early Touchscreen Scrolling

    Rachael Bedford;Irati R. Saez de Urabain;Celeste H. M. Cheung;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Attentional synchrony and the influence of viewing task on gaze behavior in static and dynamic scenes.

    Tim J. Smith;Parag K. Mital

  • Developing technology for autism: an interdisciplinary approach

    K. Porayska-Pomsta;C. Frauenberger;H. Pain;G. Rajendran

  • Do the eyes really have it? Dynamic allocation of attention when viewing moving faces

    Melissa L.-H. Võ;Tim J. Smith;Parag K. Mital;John M. Henderson

  • The influence of clutter on real-world scene search: evidence from search efficiency and eye movements.

    John M. Henderson;Myriam Chanceaux;Tim J. Smith

  • The attentional theory of cinematic continuity

    Tim J. Smith

  • Parsing eye-tracking data of variable quality to provide accurate fixation duration estimates in infants and adults.

    Sam Wass;Tim J. Smith;Mark H. Johnson

  • A Window on Reality Perceiving Edited Moving Images

    Tim J. Smith;Daniel Levin;James E. Cutting

  • Watching you watch movies: using eye tracking to inform film theory

    Tim J. Smith

  • What Would Jaws Do? The Tyranny of Film and the Relationship between Gaze and Higher-Level Narrative Film Comprehension

    Lester C. Loschky;Adam M. Larson;Joseph P. Magliano;Tim J. Smith

  • Individual Differences in Infant Fixation Duration Relate to Attention and Behavioral Control in Childhood

    Kostas A. Papageorgiou;Tim J. Smith;Rachel Wu;Mark H. Johnson

  • Cancelled operations: a 7-day cohort study of planned adult inpatient surgery in 245 UK National Health Service hospitals

    D.J.N. Wong;D.J.N. Wong;S.K. Harris;S.R. Moonesinghe;S.R. Moonesinghe;S. Ramani Moonesinghe

  • Facilitation of return during scene viewing

    Tim J. Smith;John M. Henderson

  • An Attentional Theory of Continuity Editing

    Tim J Smith

  • Shorter spontaneous fixation durations in infants with later emerging autism.

    Sam V. Wass;Emily J. H. Jones;Teodora Gliga;Tim J. Smith

  • Embodied visions: evolution, emotion, culture and film

    Tim J. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Henderson
John M. Henderson University of California, Davis
Mark H. Johnson
Mark H. Johnson University of Cambridge
Joseph P. Magliano
Joseph P. Magliano Georgia State University
Martin Eimer
Martin Eimer Birkbeck, University of London
Antje Nuthmann
Antje Nuthmann Kiel University
Atsushi Senju
Atsushi Senju Birkbeck, University of London
Sam Wass
Sam Wass University of East London
Oliver Lemon
Oliver Lemon Heriot-Watt University
Teodora Gliga
Teodora Gliga University of East Anglia
Angelica Ronald
Angelica Ronald Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology degree program can have a significant impact on your education and career opportunities. Online degrees in psychology offer flexibility, but it’s important to consider factors like program reputation, affordability, and regional job prospects. Prospective students should research specialized rankings, such as the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in Phoenix and the best value psychology programs in Raleigh for insights into what different locations offer.

Comparing most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in St. Louis and most valuable psychology degrees in South Carolina can also help you identify how programs stack up based on future earning potential and local demand. These resources guide students toward programs that not only meet educational needs, but also align with career goals such as counseling, clinical practice, research, or organizational psychology. Exploring regional differences and online degree options increases your chances of finding a program that suits your ambitions and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Tim J. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles