World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
7229
World Ranking
6785
National Ranking
308

Ronald Noë publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald Noë sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 71 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ronald Noë D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald Noë sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald Noë is affiliated with the University of Strasbourg in France, contributing to research primarily within the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Social Sciences.

Their work spans several subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, and Plant Science.

The main topics covered in their research include Plant and Animal Studies, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Primate Behavior and Ecology, Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions, and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies.

Recent published papers reflect this interdisciplinary focus:

  1. "Kea, Nestor notabilis, achieve cooperation in dyads, triads, and tetrads when dominants show restraint" (2021) published in Learning & Behavior
  2. "A marine cleaning mutualism provides new insights in biological market dynamics" (2023) published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  3. "Waste Can Be Traded with Mutualistic Partners" (2020) published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Ronald Noë frequently collaborates with several researchers including:

  • Raoul Schwing
  • Estelle Meaux
  • Andrea Piseddu
  • Ludwig Huber
  • Redouan Bshary

Their publications often appear in venues such as:

  • Learning & Behavior
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Best Publications

  • Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating

    Ronald Noë;Peter Hammerstein

  • Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality

    Patrick Abbot;Jun Abe;John Alcock;Samuel Alizon

  • Diana monkey long-distance calls : messages for conspecifics and predators

    Klaus Zuberbühler;Ronald Noë;Robert M Seyfarth

  • Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Free-Ranging Sooty Mangabeys (Cercocebus atys atys) from the Taï Forest, Côte d'Ivoire: Implications for the Origin of Epidemic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2

    Mario L. Santiago;Friederike Range;Brandon F. Keele;Yingying Li

  • Cooperation experiments: coordination through communication versus acting apart together

    Ronald Noë

  • A veto game played by baboons: a challenge to the use of the Prisoner's Dilemma as a paradigm for reciprocity and cooperation

    Ronald Noë

  • Evolution of microbial markets

    Gijsbert D. A. Werner;Joan E. Strassmann;Aniek B. F. Ivens;Daniel J. P. Engelmoer

  • Supply and demand determine the market value of food providers in wild vervet monkeys

    Cécile Fruteau;Bernhard Voelkl;Eric van Damme;Ronald Noë

  • Reproductive Tactics of Male Savanna Baboons

    Ronald Noë;Albertha A. Sluijter

  • The formation of red colobus–diana monkey associations under predation pressure from chimpanzees

    Ronald Noë;Redouan Bshary

  • Biological trade and markets.

    Peter Hammerstein;Ronald Noë

  • Red colobus and Diana monkeys provide mutual protection against predators.

    Redouan Bshary;Ronald Noë

  • Types of Dominance in a Chimpanzee Colony

    Ronald Noë;Frans B.M. de Waal;Jan A.R.A.M. van Hooff

  • Economics in Nature: Social Dilemmas, Mate Choice and Biological Markets

    Ronald Noë;Jan A. R. A. M. Van Hooff;Peter Hammerstein

  • Mycorrhizal Fungi Respond to Resource Inequality by Moving Phosphorus from Rich to Poor Patches across Networks.

    Matthew D. Whiteside;Gijsbert D.A. Werner;Victor E.A. Caldas;Anouk van’t Padje

  • A community-level evaluation of the impact of prey behavioural and ecological characteristics on predator diet composition.

    Susanne Shultz;Ronald Noë;W. Scott McGraw;R. I. M. Dunbar

  • Which adult male savanna baboons form coalitions

    Ronald Noë;Ronald Noë;Albertha A. Sluijter;Albertha A. Sluijter

  • Familiarity and dominance relations among female sooty mangabeys in the Taï National Park

    Friederike Range;Ronald Noë

  • Biological Markets : The Ubiquitous Influence of Partner Choice on the Dynamics of Cleaner Fish - Client Reef Fish Interactions

    Redouan Bshary;Ronald Noë

  • HOW ADAPTIVE OR PHYLOGENETICALLY INERT IS PRIMATE SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR? A TEST WITH TWO SYMPATRIC COLOBINES

    Amanda H. Korstjens;Elisabeth H. M. Sterck;Ronald NOë

  • A model of coalition formation among male baboons with lighting ability as the crucial parameter

    Ronald Noë

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus Zuberbühler
Klaus Zuberbühler University of Neuchâtel
Redouan Bshary
Redouan Bshary University of Neuchâtel
Friederike Range
Friederike Range University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Eric Delaporte
Eric Delaporte University of Montpellier
Martine Peeters
Martine Peeters Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
E. Toby Kiers
E. Toby Kiers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Eric van Damme
Eric van Damme Tilburg University
Susanne Shultz
Susanne Shultz University of Manchester
Michael William Bruford
Michael William Bruford Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens several pathways in research, conservation, education, and policy. Many students opt for related online degrees to expand their expertise or transition into interdisciplinary fields such as public health, environmental management, or social advocacy.

Those interested in health or community roles may consider online offerings like the social work masters programs online, which equip graduates to address critical societal and environmental challenges. Alternatively, students from nursing backgrounds can advance their credentials affordably with cheapest bsn to msn online programs.

Choosing a reputable and supportive institution is vital—look for accredited, student-focused options such as these non profit university programs. If you are active-duty military or a veteran, quality options like online college for military can provide the flexibility and resources you need to advance your education alongside your service.

Online study offers a flexible bridge to new careers or advanced degrees, making it accessible for students from diverse backgrounds eager to address today’s ecological and evolutionary challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald Noë

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles