World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
9440
World Ranking
6117
National Ranking
238

Eric van Damme publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric van Damme sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 273 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Eric van Damme D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric van Damme sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric van Damme is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with a particular emphasis on Game Theory and Voting Systems as well as Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems. Their work spans multiple subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Law, Safety Research, Political Science and International Relations, and Management Science and Operations Research.

Their scholarly output includes studies and analyses related to Experimental Behavioral Economics, Merger and Competition Analysis, as well as European and International Contract Law. They also explore topics involving Comparative and International Law Studies and Legal case studies and regulations.

Eric van Damme's recent papers are published in several academic venues, reflecting a consistent engagement with the field. The venues of publication include Markt en Mededinging, arXiv (Cornell University), and SSRN Electronic Journal. Their recent papers include:

  • Concurrentie en duurzaamheid gaan hand in hand, 2020, Markt en Mededinging
  • Markt & marktfalen, 2021, Markt en Mededinging
  • Markt, milieu en muggenzifterij, 2022, Markt en Mededinging
  • Two-Person Bargaining when the Disagreement Point is Private Information, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Efficiency, Durability and Ordinality in 2-Person Bargaining with Incomplete Information1, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal

They frequently collaborate with other researchers. Notable coauthors include Lang Xu, Jasper van den Boom, Inge Graef, Cédric Argenton, and Xu Lang, each of whom has contributed to multiple publications with them.

Eric van Damme has published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Markt en Mededinging
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of European Competition Law & Practice
  • Games and Economic Behavior

Best Publications

  • Global games and equilibrium selection

    Hans Carlsson;Eric Van Damme

  • Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria

    Eric van Damme

  • Information, strategic behavior, and fairness in ultimatum bargaining: an experimental study

    Werner Güth;Eric van Damme

  • Stable equilibria and forward induction

    Eric van Damme

  • MARKET DEFINITION IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS: THEORY AND PRACTICE

    Lapo Filistrucchi;Damien Geradin;Eric van Damme;Pauline Affeldt

  • Endogenous Stackelberg leadership

    Eric van Damme;Sjaak Hurkens

  • Refinements of the Nash Equilibrium Concept

    Eric van Damme

  • Endogenous price leadership

    Eric van Damme;Sjaak Hurkens

  • Renegotiation-proof equilibria in repeated prisoners' dilemma

    Eric van Damme

  • Supply and demand determine the market value of food providers in wild vervet monkeys

    Cécile Fruteau;Bernhard Voelkl;Eric van Damme;Ronald Noë

  • Signalling in a Dynamic Labour Market

    Georg Noldeke;Eric van Damme

  • Games with Imperfectly Observable Commitment

    Eric van Damme;Eric van Damme;Sjaak Hurkens;Sjaak Hurkens

  • An Experimental Test of Direct and Indirect Reciprocity in Case of Complete and Incomplete Information

    Martin Dufwenberg;Uri Gneezy;Werner Güth;Eric E. C. van Damme

  • The Nash bargaining solution is optimal

    Eric van Damme

  • Evolutionary Game Theory

    Eric Van Damme

  • Hiding an inconvenient truth: Lies and vagueness

    Marta Serra-Garcia;Eric van Damme;Jan Potters

  • Characterizing the Nash and Raiffa Bargaining Solutions by Disagreement Point Axioms

    Hans Peters;Eric Van Damme

  • The European UMTS-auction

    Eric van Damme

  • Commitment Robust Equilibria and Endogenous Timing

    Eric van Damme;Sjaak Hurkens

  • How Werner Güth's ultimatum game shaped our understanding of social behavior☆

    Eric E. van Damme;Ken K.G. Binmore;A.E. A.E. Roth;Larry L. Samuelson

  • Information, strategic behavior and fairness in ultimatum bargaining: An experimental study

    W. Gueth;Eric van Damme

  • A relation between perfect equilibria in extensive form games and proper equilibria in normal form games

    Eric van Damme

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner Güth
Werner Güth Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Jan Potters
Jan Potters Tilburg University
Jörgen W. Weibull
Jörgen W. Weibull Stockholm School of Economics
Ronald Noë
Ronald Noë University of Strasbourg
Reinhard Selten
Reinhard Selten University of Bonn
Immanuel M. Bomze
Immanuel M. Bomze University of Vienna
Giancarlo Spagnolo
Giancarlo Spagnolo University of Rome Tor Vergata
John C. Harsanyi
John C. Harsanyi University of California, Berkeley
Uri Gneezy
Uri Gneezy University of California, San Diego
Martin Dufwenberg
Martin Dufwenberg University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a variety of flexible online degree options. Many students choose to begin with an online accelerated bachelor's degree for a fast track into the workforce or advanced studies. These programs allow you to earn a recognized qualification in less time, balancing study with work or family responsibilities.

For those seeking to specialize further, you might consider enrolling in one of the masters programs in psychology. These degrees can lead to roles in counseling, human resources, research, or academia, and many affordable online pathways are available. If you want a broader skillset, look into an online master's degree that is designed for completion in just one year, maximizing your time and investment.

Those aspiring to leadership or advanced research positions in education can pursue the shortest online EdD programs. These fast-track doctorates focus on practical solutions to complex educational challenges and are ideal for professionals seeking career growth without putting their careers on hold.

Best Scientists Citing Eric van Damme

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles