World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
5917
World Ranking
9151
National Ranking
3861

Duck O. Kim publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Duck O. Kim sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Duck O. Kim D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Duck O. Kim sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Duck O. Kim is affiliated with the University of Connecticut Health Center in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, sensory systems, signal processing, and electrical and electronic engineering.

Their work covers several main topics, including hearing loss and rehabilitation, hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, and genetics, speech and audio processing, face recognition and perception, advanced memory and neural computing, as well as EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Kim's recent publications include the following:

  • Amplitude modulation transfer functions reveal opposing populations within both the inferior colliculus and medial geniculate body, 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Processing Temporal Modulations in Binaural and Monaural Auditory Stimuli by Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus and Auditory Cortex, 2021, UNC Libraries
  • Editorial: Response to an object near the head/body: Multisensory coding and motor processing guided by sensory systems, 2023, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Exploring Using a Graphic Novel for Mental Health Awareness With Deaf and Hard of Hearing College Students, 2025, Creative Nursing

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kim include Shigeyuki Kuwada, Laurel H. Carney, Douglas C. Fitzpatrick, Jason M. Roberts, and Blagoje Filipovic.

Their work has been published in several venues, notably:

  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Creative Nursing

Best Publications

  • A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics

    Stephen T Neely;D. O. Kim

  • Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity.

    Jonathan H. Siegel;D.O. Kim

  • Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure.

    D. O. Kim;C. E. Molnar;J. W. Matthews

  • An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity

    Stephen T. Neely;D.O. Kim

  • Cochlear mechanics: Implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations ☆

    D.O. Kim

  • Active and nonlinear cochlear biomechanics and the role of outer-hair-cell subsystem in the mammalian auditory system.

    D.O. Kim

  • A population study of cochlear nerve fibers: comparison of spatial distributions of average-rate and phase-locking measures of responses to single tones

    D. O. Kim;C. E. Molnar

  • Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum.

    D.O. Kim;J.G. Sirianni;S.O. Chang

  • The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears

    Patrick M. Zurek;William W. Clark;D. O. Kim

  • Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of normally-hearing adults.

    Jacek Smurzynski;D.O. Kim

  • Responses of neurons to click-pairs as simulated echoes: Auditory nerve to auditory cortex

    Douglas C. Fitzpatrick;Shigeyuki Kuwada;D. O. Kim;Kourosh Parham

  • Cochlear nerve fiber responses: Distribution along the cochlear partition

    Russell R. Pfeiffer;Duck O. Kim

  • Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans.

    D. O. Kim;P. A. Dorn;Stephen T Neely;Michael P Gorga

  • Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones

    W.W. Clark;D.O. Kim;P.M. Zurek;B.A. Bohne

  • Stimulus and recovery dependence of cat cochlear nerve fiber spike discharge probability.

    R P Gaumond;C E Molnar;D O Kim

  • Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: performance regarding sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics.

    D. O. Kim;J. Paparello;M. D. Jung;J. Smurzynski

  • Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.

    J. H. Siegel;D. O. Kim;C. E. Molnar

  • Response patterns of single cochlear nerve fibers to click stimuli: descriptions for cat.

    Russell R. Pfeiffer;Duck On Kim

  • Responses of auditory nerve fibers of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat to click pairs as simulated echoes

    K. Parham;H. B. Zhao;D. O. Kim

  • Spontaneous and sound-evoked discharge characteristics of complex-spiking neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat.

    K. Parham;D. O. Kim

  • A population study of auditory-nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats: response to pure tones.

    D. O. Kim;S. O. Chang;J. G. Sirianni

Frequent Co-Authors

Shigeyuki Kuwada
Shigeyuki Kuwada University of Connecticut Health Center
Douglas L. Oliver
Douglas L. Oliver University of Connecticut Health Center
Andrew J. King
Andrew J. King University of Leicester
Eric D. Young
Eric D. Young Johns Hopkins University
James F. Willott
James F. Willott University of South Florida
Elisa Barbarese
Elisa Barbarese University of Connecticut Health Center
Jason M. Roberts
Jason M. Roberts University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to diverse and rewarding career paths. Many students today seek flexible educational options that match their interests and timelines. For those considering advanced clinical roles, pursuing the shortest online psyd programs can be a great way to quickly earn a psychology doctorate and qualify for licensure.

Another option is Marriage and Family Therapy. Accredited mft programs online allow you to specialize in therapy and counseling, often with accelerated pathways to completion. These programs are tailored for students eager to enter the workforce or advance their current position in mental health fields.

If you’re looking to fast-track your education, consider enrolling in accelerated online degrees. These condensed programs enable motivated learners to finish their bachelor’s degree faster, saving both time and tuition.

Finally, for those concerned about future earnings, it’s valuable to explore the highest paid degrees. Combining neuroscience with in-demand skills can lead to lucrative opportunities in research, healthcare, tech, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Duck O. Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles