World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip X. Joris

Philip X. Joris

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
8429
World Ranking
8462
National Ranking
102

Philip X. Joris publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip X. Joris sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 141 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Philip X. Joris D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip X. Joris sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip X. Joris is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has made contributions primarily in the field of neuroscience. Their research spans several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, sensory systems, developmental biology, biomedical engineering, and ecology.

The scientist's work focuses on topics related to hearing and auditory processes, including hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics, hearing loss and rehabilitation, and neural dynamics and brain function. Other areas of interest include animal vocal communication and behavior, marine animal studies, neuroscience and music perception, and acoustic wave phenomena research.

Frequent publication venues for Philip X. Joris include The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Hearing Research, eLife, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

  • Philip H. Smith
  • Hsin-Wei Lu
  • Eric Verschooten
  • Tom P. Franken
  • Yi-Hsuan Li

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Philip X. Joris include:

  • "Glycinergic axonal inhibition subserves acute spatial sensitivity to sudden increases in sound intensity," 2021, published in eLife
  • "Mammalian octopus cells are direction selective to frequency sweeps by excitatory synaptic sequence detection," 2022, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Physiological Motion Compensation for Neuroscience Research Based on Electrical Bio-Impedance Sensing," 2023, published in IEEE Sensors Journal
  • "Temporal Correlates to Monaural Edge Pitch in the Distribution of Interspike Interval Statistics in the Auditory Nerve," 2021, published in eNeuro
  • "Enhancement of phase-locking in rodents. II. An axonal recording study in chinchilla," 2023, published in Journal of Neurophysiology

The published work frequently collaborates with a core group of co-authors, with multiple papers featuring Philip H. Smith, Hsin-Wei Lu, and Eric Verschooten, among others. This network of collaborators supports multidisciplinary approaches to understanding auditory neuroscience and sensory systems.

Best Publications

  • Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds.

    Philip Joris;C E Schreiner;A Rees

  • Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat.

    Philip X. Joris;Tom C. T. Yin

  • Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. I. Responses to tones at the characteristic frequency

    Philip X. Joris;Laurel H. Carney;Philip H. Smith;Tom C. T. Yin

  • Projections of physiologically characterized spherical bushy cell axons from the cochlear nucleus of the cat: evidence for delay lines to the medial superior olive.

    Philip H. Smith;Philip X. Joris;Tom C. T. Yin

  • Projections of physiologically characterized globular bushy cell axons from the cochlear nucleus of the cat

    Philip H. Smith;Philip X. Joris;Laurel H. Carney;Tom C. T. Yin

  • Coincidence detection in the auditory system: 50 years after Jeffress.

    Philip X Joris;Philip H Smith;Tom C.T Yin

  • Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences

    Philip Joris;T C Yin

  • Detection of synchrony in the activity of auditory nerve fibers by octopus cells of the mammalian cochlear nucleus

    Donata Oertel;Ramazan Bal;Stephanie M. Gardner;Philip H. Smith

  • Anatomy and Physiology of Principal Cells of the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body (MNTB) of the Cat

    Philip H. Smith;Philip X. Joris;Philip X. Joris;Tom C. T. Yin

  • A matter of time: internal delays in binaural processing

    Philip Joris;Tom C.T. Yin

  • Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. II. Responses in the tuning curve tail

    Philip Joris;P H Smith;T C Yin

  • Envelope Coding in the Lateral Superior Olive. III. Comparison With Afferent Pathways

    Philip X. Joris;Tom C. T. Yin

  • Interaural Time Sensitivity Dominated by Cochlea-Induced Envelope Patterns

    Philip X. Joris

  • Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive.

    Philip Joris

  • Frequency selectivity in Old-World monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans

    Philip X. Joris;Christopher Bergevin;Radha Kalluri;Myles Mc Laughlin

  • Temporal Properties of Responses to Broadband Noise in the Auditory Nerve

    Dries H. G. Louage;Marcel van der Heijden;Philip X. Joris

  • Binaural and cochlear disparities

    Philip X. Joris;Bram Van de Sande;Dries H. Louage;Marcel van der Heijden

  • Acoustic stria: anatomy of physiologically characterized cells and their axonal projection patterns.

    Philip H. Smith;Ann Massie;Philip X. Joris

  • The Volley theory and the Spherical Cell puzzle

    Philip X. Joris;Philip H. Smith

  • Receptive fields and binaural interactions for virtual-space stimuli in the cat inferior colliculus

    Bertrand Delgutte;Philip X. Joris;Ruth Y. Litovsky;Ruth Y. Litovsky;Tom C. T. Yin

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip H. Smith
Philip H. Smith University of Wisconsin–Madison
Tom C. T. Yin
Tom C. T. Yin University of Wisconsin–Madison
John Rinzel
John Rinzel New York University
Shihab A. Shamma
Shihab A. Shamma University of Maryland, College Park
Benedikt Grothe
Benedikt Grothe Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Laurence O. Trussell
Laurence O. Trussell Oregon Health & Science University
Bertrand Delgutte
Bertrand Delgutte Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Donata Oertel
Donata Oertel University of Wisconsin–Madison
Albert S. Berrebi
Albert S. Berrebi West Virginia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Philip X. Joris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles