World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9218 8615 10 10 123 5446

Aneta Przepiorka publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aneta Przepiorka between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aneta Przepiorka published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2016. 21 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2016. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 8 publications
1986 2025

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aneta Przepiorka: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 8
2014 6
2015 8
2016 22
2017 8
2018 6
2019 9
2020 13
2021 19
2022 3
2023 8
2024 13
2025 8
Total 134
Download as CSV

Aneta Przepiorka publications per year - data summary

  • Aneta Przepiorka, a Psychology scholar from John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, has 134 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2016, with 22 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1986, 2009 and 2012, with 1 publication each.
  • 24 of the 40 years in the span carry no publications at all (1987, 1988, 1989, 1990 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.4 per year counting only the 16 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 51 publications, 38% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 2000-2013: 10 publications (0.7 per year); 2014-2025: 123 publications (10.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Aneta Przepiorka publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aneta Przepiorka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 123
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Aneta Przepiorka publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Aneta Przepiorka, a Psychology scholar from John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, records 123 publications - the 34th percentile of the discipline.
  • 34% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Aneta Przepiorka, and about 66% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Aneta Przepiorka ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Aneta Przepiorka D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aneta Przepiorka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Aneta Przepiorka D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Aneta Przepiorka, a Psychology scholar from John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, records 37 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Aneta Przepiorka, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Aneta Przepiorka ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Aneta Przepiorka is affiliated with the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin in Poland and has contributed extensively to the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences. Their research spans several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Education, and Clinical Psychology.

The primary topics covered in their work include:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Przepiorka's research output includes a variety of recent papers published in recognized academic journals. Notable publications are:

  • "Mobile Phone Addiction, Phubbing, and Depression Among Men and Women: A Moderated Mediation Analysis" (2020), Psychiatric Quarterly
  • "Universality of the Triangular Theory of Love: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Triangular Love Scale in 25 Countries" (2020), The Journal of Sex Research
  • "Time of pandemic: Temporal perspectives related to compliance with public health regulations concerning the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), Social Science & Medicine
  • "People with Positive Time Perspective are More Grateful and Happier: Gratitude Mediates the Relationship Between Time Perspective and Life Satisfaction" (2020), Journal of Happiness Studies
  • "Measurement invariance of the Phubbing Scale across 20 countries" (2021), International Journal of Psychology

In addition to journal articles, Przepiorka has contributed to book publications, including a work published by Frontiers Media titled "Online Psychology Beyond Addiction and Gaming: A Global Look at Mental Health and Internet-Related Technologies" (2022).

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Agata Błachnio (41 co-authored publications)
  • Andrzej Cudo (15 co-authored publications)
  • Małgorzata Sobol (10 co-authored publications)
  • Martina Benvenuti (9 co-authored publications)
  • Elvis Mazzoni (9 co-authored publications)

Przepiorka has published repeatedly in several academic journals, with the most frequent venues being:

  • Current Psychology
  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • International Journal of Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Best Publications

  • A Global Look at Time: A 24-Country Study of the Equivalence of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory

    Anna Sircova;Fons J. R. van de Vijver;Fons J. R. van de Vijver;Fons J. R. van de Vijver;Evgeny Osin;Taciano L. Milfont

  • Association between Facebook addiction, self-esteem and life satisfaction

    Agata Błachnio;Aneta Przepiorka;Igor Pantic

  • Internet use, Facebook intrusion, and depression: Results of a cross-sectional study

    Agata Błachnio;Aneta Przepiorka;Igor Pantic

  • Facebook intrusion, fear of missing out, narcissism, and life satisfaction: A cross-sectional study.

    Agata Błachnio;Aneta Przepiórka

  • The role of personality traits in Facebook and Internet addictions

    Agata Bachnio;Aneta Przepiorka;Emre Senol-Durak;Mithat Durak

  • Narcissism and self-esteem as predictors of dimensions of Facebook use

    Agata Błachnio;Aneta Przepiorka;Patrycja Rudnicka

  • Be Aware! If You Start Using Facebook Problematically You Will Feel Lonely: Phubbing, Loneliness, Self-esteem, and Facebook Intrusion. A Cross-Sectional Study:

    Agata Błachnio;Aneta Przepiorka

  • Psychological Determinants of Using Facebook: A Research Review

    Agata Błachnio;Aneta Przepiórka;Patrycja Rudnicka

  • Time perspective in Internet and Facebook addiction

    Aneta Przepiorka;Agata Blachnio

  • Personality and positive orientation in Internet and Facebook addiction. An empirical report from Poland

    Agata Błachnio;Aneta Przepiorka

  • Self-presentation styles, privacy, and loneliness as predictors of Facebook use in young people

    Agata Błachnio;Aneta Przepiorka;Wioleta Boruch;Edyta Bałakier

  • Dysfunction of Self-Regulation and Self-Control in Facebook Addiction

    Agata Błachnio;Aneta Przepiorka

  • Development and validation of the Dark Future scale

    Zbigniew Zaleski;Malgorzata Sobol-Kwapinska;Aneta Przepiorka;Michal Meisner

  • Clinical approaches to treatment of Internet addiction

    Aneta Małgorzata Przepiorka;Agata Blachnio;Barbara Miziak;Stanisław Jerzy Czuczwar

  • The relationships between self-efficacy, self-control, chronotype, procrastination and sleep problems in young adults.

    Aneta Przepiórka;Agata Błachnio;Nicolson Yat-Fan Siu

  • Problematic Facebook use and procrastination

    Aneta Przepiorka;Agata Bachnio;Juan F. Daz-Morales

  • Universality of the triangular theory of love: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the triangular love scale in 25 countries

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Maciej Karwowski;Agata Groyecka

  • The role of depression, personality, and future time perspective in internet addiction in adolescents and emerging adults.

    Aneta Przepiorka;Agata Blachnio;Andrzej Cudo

  • Psychological Determinants of Entrepreneurial Success and Life-Satisfaction

    Aneta M. Przepiorka

  • Time of pandemic: Temporal perspectives related to compliance with public health regulations concerning the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Małgorzata Sobol;Agata Blachnio;Aneta Przepiórka

Frequent Co-Authors

Agata Błachnio
Agata Błachnio John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
Menachem Ben-Ezra
Menachem Ben-Ezra Ariel University
Anise M. S. Wu
Anise M. S. Wu University of Macau
Ilias O. Pappas
Ilias O. Pappas Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Fons J. R. van de Vijver
Fons J. R. van de Vijver Tilburg University
Michail N. Giannakos
Michail N. Giannakos Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Peter Kuppens
Peter Kuppens KU Leuven
Juan Francisco Díaz-Morales
Juan Francisco Díaz-Morales Complutense University of Madrid
Philip G. Zimbardo
Philip G. Zimbardo Stanford University
Frank C. Worrell
Frank C. Worrell University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a variety of online degrees and career options, particularly in counseling. Many students look for affordability without having to compromise on quality or accreditation. It’s important to compare tuition rates, program flexibility, and licensure opportunities when choosing the right path.

For those seeking wallet-friendly education, researching the cheapest counseling programs in California can provide insight into cost-effective West Coast options. Similarly, students interested in urban environments could investigate affordable counseling degrees in Chicago.

Prospective counselors in more central locations can consider the cheapest counseling programs in Colorado for programs that balance cost and career outcomes. If you’re located in the Northeast, exploring the cheapest counseling programs in Connecticut is a practical way to start.

As the counseling and psychology fields expand, researching affordable online options can help you launch a meaningful and flexible career without overwhelming debt.

Best Scientists Citing Aneta Przepiorka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles