World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 41 8620 8375 24 24 120 12096

Ilias O. Pappas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ilias O. Pappas between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ilias O. Pappas published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2020. 23 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2020. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 16 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 10 publications
2004 2025

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ilias O. Pappas: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 7
2006 4
2007 3
2008 3
2009 6
2010 4
2011 3
2012 14
2013 3
2014 4
2015 1
2016 16
2017 23
2018 21
2019 10
2020 24
2021 19
2022 18
2023 17
2024 13
2025 10
Total 225
Download as CSV

Ilias O. Pappas publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilias O. Pappas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 112–121 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 120 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497 120
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Ilias O. Pappas D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilias O. Pappas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 41
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ilias O. Pappas is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway. Their research spans multiple disciplines, focusing extensively on business, management, accounting, social sciences, and computer science. Within these broad fields, their work delves into subfields such as sociology and political science, strategy and management, artificial intelligence, management information systems, and computer science applications.

Their research topics cover a diverse range of areas including big data and business intelligence, ethics and social impacts of AI, AI in service interactions, qualitative comparative analysis research, online learning and analytics, information systems theories and implementation, and digital transformation in industry.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou, Matti Mäntymäki, Michail N. Giannakos, and Patrick Mikalef.

Among the journals where they have commonly published are Information Systems Frontiers, International Journal of Information Management, HAPSc Policy Briefs Series, arXiv (Cornell University), and Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence.

Selected recent publications authored or coauthored by Ilias O. Pappas include:

  • "Opinion Paper: 'So what if ChatGPT wrote it?' Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy" (2023), published in International Journal of Information Management
  • "Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy" (2022), published in International Journal of Information Management
  • "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing" (2021), published in International Journal of Information Management
  • "AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature" (2021), published in Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
  • "Identifying the combinations of motivations and emotions for creating satisfied users in SNSs: An fsQCA approach" (2020), published in International Journal of Information Management

Ilias O. Pappas has contributed to several books published by Springer Science+Business Media. These include titles such as "Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology" (2020), "Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society" (2021), "Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Society in the 21st Century" (2020), "New Sustainable Horizons in Artificial Intelligence and Digital Solutions" (2023), and "Disruptive Innovation in a Digitally Connected Healthy World" (2024).

Best Publications

  • Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy

    Unknown

  • Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing

    Ilias O. Pappas;Ilias O. Pappas;Arch G. Woodside

  • Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda

    Patrick Mikalef;Ilias O. Pappas;John Krogstie;Michail Giannakos

  • Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities

    Patrick Mikalef;John Krogstie;Ilias O. Pappas;Ilias O. Pappas;Paul A. Pavlou

  • AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature

    Tumaini Kabudi;Ilias O. Pappas;Dag Håkon Olsen

  • Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions

    Ilias O. Pappas;Ilias O. Pappas;Panos E. Kourouthanassis;Michail N. Giannakos;Vassilios Chrissikopoulos

  • Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies

    Ilias O. Pappas;Patrick Mikalef;Michail N. Giannakos;John Krogstie

  • User experience in personalized online shopping: a fuzzy-set analysis

    Ilias O. Pappas

  • Big data and business analytics: A research agenda for realizing business value

    Patrick Mikalef;Patrick Mikalef;Ilias O. Pappas;Ilias O. Pappas;John Krogstie;Paul A. Pavlou

  • Multimodal Data as a means to understand the Learning Experience

    Michail N. Giannakos;Kshitij Sharma;Ilias O. Pappas;Ilias O. Pappas;Vassilis Kostakos

  • The interplay of online shopping motivations and experiential factors on personalized e-commerce

    Ilias O. Pappas;Panos E. Kourouthanassis;Michail N. Giannakos;George Lekakos

  • Understanding student retention in computer science education: The role of environment, gains, barriers and usefulness

    Michail N. Giannakos;Ilias O. Pappas;Letizia Jaccheri;Demetrios G. Sampson

  • Identifying the combinations of motivations and emotions for creating satisfied users in SNSs : An fsQCA approach

    Ilias O. Pappas;Ilias O. Pappas;Sofia Papavlasopoulou;Patrick Mikalef;Michail N. Giannakos

  • Fuzzy set analysis as a means to understand users of 21st-century learning systems: The case of mobile learning and reflections on learning analytics research

    Ilias O. Pappas;Michail N. Giannakos;Demetrios G. Sampson;Demetrios G. Sampson

  • Software startup engineering: A systematic mapping study

    Vebjørn Berg;Jørgen Birkeland;Anh Nguyen-Duc;Ilias O. Pappas

  • Systematic Literature Review of E-Learning Capabilities to Enhance Organizational Learning

    Michail N Giannakos;Patrick Mikalef;Ilias O Pappas;Ilias O Pappas

  • Explaining User Experience in Mobile Gaming Applications: An fsQCA Approach

    Ilias O. Pappas;Patrick Mikalef;Michail N. Giannakos;Panos E. Kourouthanassis

  • Designing social commerce platforms based on consumers ’ intentions

    Patrick Mikalef;Michail N. Giannakos;Ilias O. Pappas

  • Utilizing Multimodal Data Through fsQCA to Explain Engagement in Adaptive Learning

    Zacharoula Papamitsiou;Ilias O. Pappas;Kshitij Sharma;Michail N. Giannakos

  • Explaining travellers online information satisfaction: A complexity theory approach on information needs, barriers, sources and personal characteristics

    Panos E. Kourouthanassis;Patrick Mikalef;Ilias O. Pappas;Petros A. Kostagiolas

  • Applying and Understanding an Advanced, Novel Deep Learning Approach: A Covid 19, Text Based, Emotions Analysis Study.

    Jyoti Choudrie;Shruti Patil;Ketan Kotecha;Nikhil Matta

  • Investigating Factors Influencing Students' Intention to Dropout Computer Science Studies

    Ilias O. Pappas;Michail N. Giannakos;Letizia Jaccheri

Frequent Co-Authors

Michail N. Giannakos
Michail N. Giannakos Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Patrick Mikalef
Patrick Mikalef Norwegian University of Science and Technology
John Krogstie
John Krogstie Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Matti Mäntymäki
Matti Mäntymäki University of Turku
Yogesh K. Dwivedi
Yogesh K. Dwivedi King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Demetrios G. Sampson
Demetrios G. Sampson University of Piraeus
Agata Błachnio
Agata Błachnio John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
Aneta Przepiorka
Aneta Przepiorka John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
Anise M. S. Wu
Anise M. S. Wu University of Macau
Menachem Ben-Ezra
Menachem Ben-Ezra Ariel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to diverse academic and career opportunities. Many students find it useful to look beyond traditional paths and consider complementary college majors that align with technology and innovation. Pairing computer science with majors such as data science, engineering, or business can boost your versatility in the job market.

For those looking to advance quickly, a variety of easy masters programs are available online. These programs can help you specialize in areas like artificial intelligence or cybersecurity within a shorter timeframe. If you're focused on affordability, pursuing one of the cheapest phd programs online can be a smart way to boost your credentials without incurring significant debt.

Professionals interested in education or leadership roles might be drawn to 1 year edd programs online, which offer fast-track routes to educational leadership positions. By understanding these various online degree and career pathways, you can find an option that fits your goals, timeline, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Ilias O. Pappas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles