World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Norway
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 52 4984 4847 10 10 147 15569

Patrick Mikalef publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick Mikalef between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick Mikalef published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2017. 29 of the 186 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2017. 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 10 publications
2011 2025

186 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick Mikalef: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 2
2012 2
2013 3
2014 3
2015 2
2016 12
2017 24
2018 19
2019 18
2020 12
2021 24
2022 19
2023 17
2024 19
2025 10
Total 186
Download as CSV

Patrick Mikalef publications per year - data summary

  • Patrick Mikalef, a Computer Science scholar from Norwegian University of Science and Technology, has 186 publications recorded across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2011 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2017 and 2021, with 24 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2011, 2012 and 2015, with 2 publications each.
  • The rate of publication averages 12.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.4 per year counting only the 15 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 89 publications, 48% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2011-2015: 12 publications (2.4 per year); 2016-2020: 85 publications (17.0 per year); 2021-2025: 89 publications (17.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Patrick Mikalef publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Mikalef sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 147 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609 147
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick Mikalef publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Patrick Mikalef, a Computer Science scholar from Norwegian University of Science and Technology, records 147 publications - the 26th percentile of the discipline.
  • 26% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Patrick Mikalef, and about 74% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Patrick Mikalef ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Patrick Mikalef D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Mikalef sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 52
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Patrick Mikalef D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Patrick Mikalef, a Computer Science scholar from Norwegian University of Science and Technology, records 52 D-Index - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Patrick Mikalef, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Patrick Mikalef ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Norway Leader Award

Overview

Patrick Mikalef is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with a significant specialization in Management Information Systems.

Their work spans several key subfields including:

  • Management Information Systems
  • Strategy and Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Information Systems and Management

Main topics addressed in their studies are:

  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems

Patrick Mikalef has authored numerous articles in various academic journals and conferences. Recent publications include:

  • "Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance," 2021, Information & Management

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • John Krogstie
  • Kieran Conboy
  • Ilias O. Pappas
  • Emmanouil Papagiannidis
  • Rogier van de Wetering

Patrick Mikalef has contributed to academic venues such as:

  • Information Systems Frontiers
  • Information & Management
  • International Journal of Information Management
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • Journal of Business Research

In addition to scholarly articles, they have authored a book published by Springer Science+Business Media titled Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Society in the 21st Century (2020).

Best Publications

  • Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance

    Patrick Mikalef;Manjul Gupta

  • Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA

    Patrick Mikalef;Adamantia Pateli

  • Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda

    Patrick Mikalef;Ilias O. Pappas;John Krogstie;Michail Giannakos

  • Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review

    Ida Merete Enholm;Emmanouil Papagiannidis;Patrick Mikalef;John Krogstie

  • Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Innovation: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Moderating Effect of the Environment

    Patrick Mikalef;Maria Boura;George Lekakos;John Krogstie

  • The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies

    Eivind Kristoffersen;Fenna Blomsma;Patrick Mikalef;Jingyue Li

  • Artificial intelligence in information systems research: A systematic literature review and research agenda

    Christopher Collins;Denis Dennehy;Kieran Conboy;Patrick Mikalef

  • Big data analytics and firm performance: Findings from a mixed-method approach

    Patrick Mikalef;Maria Boura;George Lekakos;John Krogstie

  • Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies

    Ilias O. Pappas;Patrick Mikalef;Michail N. Giannakos;John Krogstie

  • Shopping and word-of-mouth intentions on social media

    Patrick Mikalef;Michail Giannakos;Adamantia Pateli

  • The effects of business analytics capability on circular economy implementation, resource orchestration capability, and firm performance

    Eivind Kristoffersen;Eivind Kristoffersen;Patrick Mikalef;Patrick Mikalef;Fenna Blomsma;Jingyue Li

  • The role of information governance in big data analytics driven innovation

    Patrick Mikalef;Maria Boura;George Lekakos;John Krogstie

  • Using business analytics to enhance dynamic capabilities in operations research: A case analysis and research agenda

    Kieran Conboy;Patrick Mikalef;Denis Dennehy;John Krogstie

  • Big data and business analytics: A research agenda for realizing business value

    Patrick Mikalef;Patrick Mikalef;Ilias O. Pappas;Ilias O. Pappas;John Krogstie;Paul A. Pavlou

  • Building dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics: : The role of organizational inertia

    Patrick Mikalef;Rogier van de Wetering;John Krogstie

  • Enabling AI capabilities in government agencies: A study of determinants for European municipalities

    Patrick Mikalef;Kristina Lemmer;Cindy Schaefer;Maija Ylinen

  • Responsible AI for Digital Health: a Synthesis and a Research Agenda

    Cristina Trocin;Patrick Mikalef;Zacharoula Papamitsiou;Kieran Conboy

  • IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment

    Patrick Mikalef;Adamantia G. Pateli;Rogier van de Wetering

  • Identifying the combinations of motivations and emotions for creating satisfied users in SNSs : An fsQCA approach

    Ilias O. Pappas;Ilias O. Pappas;Sofia Papavlasopoulou;Patrick Mikalef;Michail N. Giannakos

  • Purchasing alignment under multiple contingencies: a configuration theory approach.

    Patrick Mikalef;Adamantia G. Pateli;Ronald S. Batenburg;Rogier van de Wetering

Frequent Co-Authors

Ilias O. Pappas
Ilias O. Pappas Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Michail N. Giannakos
Michail N. Giannakos Norwegian University of Science and Technology
John Krogstie
John Krogstie Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Kieran Conboy
Kieran Conboy University of Galway
Matti Mäntymäki
Matti Mäntymäki University of Turku
Paul A. Pavlou
Paul A. Pavlou University of Miami
Yogesh K. Dwivedi
Yogesh K. Dwivedi King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Nripendra P. Rana
Nripendra P. Rana Queen's University Belfast
Sudha Ram
Sudha Ram University of Arizona
Sheshadri Chatterjee
Sheshadri Chatterjee NIIT University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Computer Science opens the door to a wide range of online programs and career options. Specializations like cybersecurity online degrees are in high demand, preparing students to tackle security breaches and protect sensitive data across industries.

For those interested in leadership roles, a master of construction management blends tech skills with project oversight, supporting careers in technologically evolving construction sectors.

Interdisciplinary fields like a masters in criminology online attract students aiming to apply data analysis and digital forensics in law enforcement and public safety careers.

Additionally, online accounting degree programs integrate computer science tools to enhance financial analysis, auditing, and reporting.

With flexible online study options, students can tailor their education to match their interests and career ambitions. Exploring these related pathways can unlock new opportunities in growing, technology-driven fields.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Mikalef

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles