World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4070 3758 1940 1759 167 10339

Andrew T. Kaczynski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew T. Kaczynski between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew T. Kaczynski published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2025. 41 of the 206 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2025. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 22 publications
2003 2025

206 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew T. Kaczynski: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 5
2005 2
2006 1
2007 2
2008 6
2009 6
2010 6
2011 4
2012 12
2013 13
2014 15
2015 10
2016 9
2017 12
2018 8
2019 16
2020 12
2021 13
2022 7
2023 5
2024 19
2025 22
Total 206
Download as CSV

Andrew T. Kaczynski publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew T. Kaczynski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 167 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 167
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew T. Kaczynski D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew T. Kaczynski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew T. Kaczynski is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Social Sciences, Health Professions, and Medicine, with a focus on interdisciplinary areas such as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Transportation.

Their work covers a variety of topics related to urban and community health, including urban transport and accessibility, urban green space and health, obesity, physical activity and diet, food security and health in diverse populations, noise effects and management, physical activity and health, as well as community health and development.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • UNC Libraries
  • Health & Place
  • Translational Behavioral Medicine
  • Preventive Medicine Reports

Among their recent papers are:

  • Development of a national childhood obesogenic environment index in the United States: differences by region and rurality (2020) in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Healthy and unhealthy food environments are linked with neighbourhood socio-economic disadvantage: an innovative geospatial approach to understanding food access inequities (2020) in Public Health Nutrition
  • Associations of public open space attributes with active and sedentary behaviors in dense urban areas: A systematic review of observational studies (2022) in Health & Place
  • Development and validation of self-efficacy and intention measures for spending time in nature (2022) in BMC Psychology
  • Walkability 101: A Multi-Method Assessment of the Walkability at a University Campus (2020) in SAGE Open

Kaczynski has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Marilyn E. Wende
  • Mohammad Javad Koohsari
  • Sara Wilcox
  • Koichiro Oka
  • Ellen W. Stowe

Their research contributions engage with themes across general health professions, focusing on how environments and urban design influence physical activity and well-being. This extends to work on transportation systems and accessibility, public open spaces, and their relationships to health outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Association of Park Size, Distance, and Features With Physical Activity in Neighborhood Parks

    Andrew T. Kaczynski;Luke R. Potwarka;Brian E. Saelens

  • Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity: A Review of Evidence about Parks and Recreation

    Andrew T. Kaczynski;Karla A. Henderson

  • Understanding differences between summer vs. school obesogenic behaviors of children: the structured days hypothesis

    Keith Brazendale;Michael W. Beets;R. Glenn Weaver;Russell R. Pate

  • Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda

    Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Suzanne Mavoa;Karen Villanueva;Karen Villanueva;Takemi Sugiyama;Takemi Sugiyama

  • Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an mHealth weight loss program

    Gabrielle M. Turner-McGrievy;Michael W. Beets;Justin B. Moore;Andrew T. Kaczynski

  • Association of Parkland Proximity with Neighborhood and Park-based Physical Activity: Variations by Gender and Age

    Andrew T. Kaczynski;Luke R. Potwarka;Bryan J. A. Smale;Mark E. Havitz

  • Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics

    Andrew T Kaczynski;Gina M Besenyi;Sonja A Wilhelm Stanis;Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Mohammad Javad Koohsari

  • Smoking and physical activity: a systematic review.

    Andrew T Kaczynski;Stephen R Manske;Roger C Mannell;Keerat Grewal

  • Places to play: association of park space and facilities with healthy weight status among children.

    Luke R. Potwarka;Andrew T. Kaczynski;Andrea L. Flack

  • Parks and Recreation Settings and Active Living: A Review of Associations With Physical Activity Function and Intensity

    Andrew T Kaczynski;Karla A Henderson

  • Exploring the distribution of park availability, features, and quality across Kansas City, Missouri by income and race/ethnicity: an environmental justice investigation

    Katherine B. Vaughan;Andrew T. Kaczynski;Sonja A.Wilhelm Stanis;Gina M. Besenyi

  • Development and Testing of a Community Stakeholder Park Audit Tool

    Andrew T. Kaczynski;Sonja A. Wilhelm Stanis;Gina M. Besenyi

  • Using an environmental justice approach to examine the relationships between park availability and quality indicators, neighborhood disadvantage, and racial/ethnic composition

    S. Morgan Hughey;Katrina M. Walsemann;Stephanie Child;Alicia Powers

  • Public Open Space and Walking: The Role of Proximity, Perceptual Qualities of the Surrounding Built Environment, and Street Configuration

    Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Justyna Anna Karakiewicz;Andrew T. Kaczynski

  • Effects of access to public open spaces on walking: Is proximity enough?

    Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Andrew T. Kaczynski;Billie Giles-Corti;Justyna Anna Karakiewicz

  • Correspondence of perceived vs. objective proximity to parks and their relationship to park-based physical activity.

    Kelsey J Lackey;Andrew T Kaczynski

  • Perceptions of Neighborhood Park Quality: Associations with Physical Activity and Body Mass Index

    Hua Bai;Sonja A. Wilhelm Stanis;Andrew T. Kaczynski;Gina M. Besenyi

  • Active commuting influences among adults.

    Melissa Bopp;Andrew T. Kaczynski;Andrew T. Kaczynski;Gina Besenyi

  • Association of Street Connectivity and Road Traffic Speed With Park Usage and Park-Based Physical Activity

    Andrew T. Kaczynski;Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Sonja A.Wilhelm Stanis;Ryan D Bergstrom

  • The Influence of Neighborhood Aesthetics, Safety, and Social Cohesion on Perceived Stress in Disadvantaged Communities

    Heather Henderson;Stephanie Child;Spencer Moore;Justin B. Moore

  • Variations in observed park physical activity intensity level by gender, race, and age: individual and joint effects.

    Andrew T. Kaczynski;Sonja A. Wilhelm Stanis;Tanis J. Hastmann;Gina M. Besenyi

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohammad Javad Koohsari
Mohammad Javad Koohsari Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Sara Wilcox
Sara Wilcox University of South Carolina
John L. Crompton
John L. Crompton Texas A&M University
Michael W. Beets
Michael W. Beets University of South Carolina
Spencer Moore
Spencer Moore Wageningen University & Research
Justin B. Moore
Justin B. Moore Wake Forest University
Takemi Sugiyama
Takemi Sugiyama Swinburne University of Technology
Ruth P. Saunders
Ruth P. Saunders University of South Carolina
Mark E. Havitz
Mark E. Havitz University of Waterloo
Roger C. Mannell
Roger C. Mannell University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The Social Sciences and Humanities fields offer diverse online degrees tailored to fit different career goals and schedules. Many students consider flexible options like msw programs, which provide accessible pathways to advanced roles in social work. These affordable and online options make it easier for working professionals to build on their skills without putting their careers on hold.

Another growing area is the field of behavior analysis. With bcba programs now widely available online, aspiring behavior analysts can prepare for certification and frontline work with clients in need of behavioral support services.

If you’re interested in accelerated options, you can explore one year msw programs or finish your undergraduate degree faster with an accelerated bachelor's degree psychology. These programs help students save both time and cost while preparing for in-demand careers. Whether you’re seeking initial training or advanced credentials, online study offers plenty of flexible, reputable opportunities in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew T. Kaczynski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles