World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 62 1262 1115 585 508 319 16526

Michael W. Beets publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael W. Beets between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael W. Beets published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 16.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2014. 49 of the 384 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2014. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 25 publications
2003 2025

384 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael W. Beets: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 4
2005 12
2006 10
2007 14
2008 4
2009 7
2010 17
2011 17
2012 12
2013 21
2014 34
2015 29
2016 20
2017 15
2018 16
2019 19
2020 16
2021 23
2022 22
2023 20
2024 24
2025 25
Total 384
Download as CSV

Michael W. Beets publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Beets sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 314–323 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 319 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101 319
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael W. Beets D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Beets sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94 62
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael W. Beets is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily within medicine and psychology, with a focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, developmental and educational psychology, physiology, general health professions, and education.

Their scholarly contributions frequently address topics related to obesity, physical activity, diet, children's physical and motor development, health and lifestyle studies, health policy implementation science, behavioral health and interventions, as well as sleep and related disorders.

Michael W. Beets has published in multiple academic venues. The most common publication outlets include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • BMC Public Health

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Michael W. Beets cover several aspects of physical activity, behavioral health, and public health interventions.

  • "Impact of theCOVID-19 pandemic on elementary schoolers' physical activity, sleep, screen time and diet: A quasi-experimental interrupted time series study," 2021, Pediatric Obesity
  • "Identification and evaluation of risk of generalizability biases in pilot versus efficacy/effectiveness trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • "Physical activity and sedentary time of youth in structured settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • "Identifying effective intervention strategies to reduce children's screen time: a systematic review and meta-analysis," 2021, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • "Children's moderate-to-vigorous physical activity on weekdays versus weekend days: a multi-country analysis," 2021, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Frequent co-authors in Michael W. Beets' research include:

  • R. Glenn Weaver
  • Bridget Armstrong
  • Sarah Burkart
  • Elizabeth L. Adams
  • Lauren von Klinggraeff

Best Publications

  • Parental Social Support and the Physical Activity-Related Behaviors of Youth: A Review

    Michael W. Beets;Bradley J. Cardinal;Brandon L. Alderman

  • Fitness vs. fatness on all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis.

    Vaughn W. Barry;Meghan Baruth;Michael W. Beets;J. Larry Durstine

  • Understanding differences between summer vs. school obesogenic behaviors of children: the structured days hypothesis

    Keith Brazendale;Michael W. Beets;R. Glenn Weaver;Russell R. Pate

  • How many steps/day are enough? for children and adolescents

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Cora L Craig;Michael W Beets;Sarahjane Belton

  • After-School Program Impact on Physical Activity and Fitness: A Meta-Analysis

    Michael W. Beets;Aaron Beighle;Heather E. Erwin;Jennifer L. Huberty

  • Physical Education's Role in Public Health: Steps Forward and Backward over 20 Years and HOPE for the Future.

    James F. Sallis;Thomas L. McKenzie;Michael W. Beets;Aaron Beighle

  • Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an mHealth weight loss program

    Gabrielle M. Turner-McGrievy;Michael W. Beets;Justin B. Moore;Andrew T. Kaczynski

  • School climate and teachers' beliefs and attitudes associated with implementation of the positive action program: a diffusion of innovations model.

    Michael W. Beets;Brian R. Flay;Samuel Vuchinich;Alan C. Acock

  • Social support and youth physical activity: the role of provider and type.

    Michael W Beets;Randy Vogel;Loretta Forlaw;Kenneth H Pitetti

  • Time spent in sedentary behavior and changes in childhood BMI: a longitudinal study from ages 9 to 15 years.

    J A Mitchell;R R Pate;M W Beets;P R Nader

  • Use of a Social and Character Development Program to Prevent Substance Use, Violent Behaviors, and Sexual Activity Among Elementary-School Students in Hawaii

    Michael W. Beets;Brian R. Flay;Samuel Vuchinich;Frank J. Snyder

  • Classification of physical activity intensities using a wrist-worn accelerometer in 8-12-year-old children.

    J. L. Chandler;K. Brazendale;M. W. Beets;B. A. Mealing

  • Describing the Use of the Internet for Health, Physical Activity, and Nutrition Information in Pregnant Women

    Jennifer Huberty;Danae M. Dinkel;Michael W. Beets;Jason D. Coleman

  • Everything you wanted to know about selecting the “right” Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but…: A systematic review

    Youngwon Kim;Michael W. Beets;Gregory J. Welk

  • Compliance With National Guidelines for Physical Activity in U.S. Preschoolers: Measurement and Interpretation

    Michael W. Beets;Daniel B. Bornstein;Marsha Dowda;Russell R. Pate

  • Accelerometer-derived physical activity levels of preschoolers: a meta-analysis.

    Daniel B. Bornstein;Michael W. Beets;Wonwoo Byun;Kerry McIver

  • The efficacy of a 9-month treadmill walking program on the exercise capacity and weight reduction for adolescents with severe autism

    Kenneth H. Pitetti;Andrew D. Rendoff;Travis Grover;Michael W. Beets

  • The accuracy of pedometer steps and time during walking in children.

    Michael W. Beets;Megan M. Patton;Stacey Edwards

  • The theory of expanded, extended, and enhanced opportunities for youth physical activity promotion

    Michael W. Beets;Anthony Okely;Anthony Okely;R. Glenn Weaver;Collin Webster

  • Pedometer-measured physical activity patterns of youth: a 13-country review.

    Michael W. Beets;Daniel Bornstein;Aaron Beighle;Bradley J. Cardinal

Frequent Co-Authors

Justin B. Moore
Justin B. Moore Wake Forest University
Russell R. Pate
Russell R. Pate University of South Carolina
Dianne S. Ward
Dianne S. Ward University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Ruth P. Saunders
Ruth P. Saunders University of South Carolina
Bo Fernhall
Bo Fernhall University of Illinois at Chicago
Brian R. Flay
Brian R. Flay Boise State University
Steven N. Blair
Steven N. Blair University of South Carolina
Alan C. Acock
Alan C. Acock Oregon State University
Andrew T. Kaczynski
Andrew T. Kaczynski University of South Carolina
Marsha Dowda
Marsha Dowda University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a variety of flexible online study options that cater to different goals and schedules. Affordable, high-quality programs are now more accessible, allowing students to pursue advanced qualifications without stepping foot on campus.

For those interested in mental health professions, an online masters in clinical psychology offers both affordability and flexibility. Educators and those wishing to lead in academia can consider online doctorate of education programs that can be completed on a fast track.

Many students are also seeking quicker routes to their degrees. 1 year master's programs can accelerate entry into the workforce, while accelerated online degree programs make it possible for learners to earn a bachelor's degree faster than traditional timelines.

Online pathways provide flexibility, reduce overall costs, and support career progression in social sciences and humanities, making them an increasingly popular choice for motivated learners.

Best Scientists Citing Michael W. Beets

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles