World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
23590
World Ranking
8477
National Ranking
3813

Stephen J. Doxsey publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Doxsey sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 138 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Stephen J. Doxsey D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Doxsey sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen J. Doxsey is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School in the United States. Their work is positioned within the academic and scientific community, focusing on research activities conducted at this institution.

There is no detailed information available about recent papers, co-authors, specific publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main research topics related to Stephen J. Doxsey. Additionally, there are no records of awards attributed to this researcher in the provided data.

Without records of published papers, it is not possible to outline the scientific contributions or specific research themes explored by Stephen J. Doxsey. Similarly, the absence of frequent co-authors and publication venues suggests a limited publicly available metadata footprint in bibliographic databases at this time.

The available data indicates that the scientist is currently living and active, yet no further details are present to provide a comprehensive overview of their research focus or scholarly output.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Pericentrin, a highly conserved centrosome protein involved in microtubule organization

    Stephen J. Doxsey;Pascal A. Stein;Louise G. Evans;Patricia D. Calarco

  • Centrosome Defects and Genetic Instability in Malignant Tumors

    German A. Pihan;Aruna Purohit;Janice Wallace;Hans Knecht

  • Pericentrin and gamma-tubulin form a protein complex and are organized into a novel lattice at the centrosome.

    Jason B. Dictenberg;Wendy Zimmerman;Cynthia A. Sparks;Aaron Young

  • Re-evaluating centrosome function.

    Stephen Doxsey

  • Centrosome abnormalities and chromosome instability occur together in pre-invasive carcinomas.

    German A. Pihan;Jan Wallace;Yening Zhou;Stephen J. Doxsey

  • Regulation of tumor cell mitochondrial Homeostasis by an organelle-specific Hsp90 chaperone network

    Byoung Heon Kang;Janet Plescia;Takehiko Dohi;Jack Rosa

  • Centriolin Anchoring of Exocyst and SNARE Complexes at the Midbody Is Required for Secretory-Vesicle-Mediated Abscission

    Adam Scott Gromley;Charles Yeaman;Jack Rosa;Sambra D. Redick

  • Centrosome defects can account for cellular and genetic changes that characterize prostate cancer progression.

    German A. Pihan;Aruna Purohit;Janice Wallace;Raji Malhotra

  • Centrosome control of the cell cycle

    Stephen J. Doxsey;Wendy Cherie Zimmerman;Keith Mikule

  • Mitosis-specific Anchoring of γ Tubulin Complexes by Pericentrin Controls Spindle Organization and Mitotic Entry

    Wendy Cherie Zimmerman;James Sillibourne;Jack Rosa;Stephen J. Doxsey

  • Centrosomes in cellular regulation.

    Stephen Doxsey;Dannel McCollum;William Theurkauf

  • Loss of centrosome integrity induces p38-p53-p21-dependent G1-S arrest.

    Keith Mikule;Benedicte Delaval;Philipp Kaldis;Agata Jurcyzk

  • A novel human protein of the maternal centriole is required for the final stages of cytokinesis and entry into S phase

    Adam Scott Gromley;Agata Jurczyk;James Sillibourne;Ensar Halilovic

  • Midbody accumulation through evasion of autophagy contributes to cellular reprogramming and tumorigenicity

    Tse-Chun Kuo;Chun-Ting Chen;Desiree Baron;Tamer T. Onder

  • The mitotic machinery as a source of genetic instability in cancer.

    German A. Pihan;Stephen J. Doxsey

  • Direct interaction of pericentrin with cytoplasmic dynein light intermediate chain contributes to mitotic spindle organization.

    Aruna Purohit;Sharon H. Tynan;Richard B. Vallee;Stephen J. Doxsey

  • Cytoplasmic Dynein-mediated Assembly of Pericentrin and γ Tubulin onto Centrosomes

    Aaron Isadore Young;Jason B. Dictenberg;Aruna Purohit;Richard A. Tuft

  • Pericentrin in cellular function and disease

    Benedicte Delaval;Stephen J. Doxsey

  • Centrosome control of the cell cycle Centrosome control of the cell cycle Centrosome control of the cell cycle Centrosome control of the cell cycle

    Stephen Doxsey;Wendy Zimmerman;Keith Mikule

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew P. Jackson
Andrew P. Jackson University of Edinburgh
Ari Helenius
Ari Helenius ETH Zurich
Don W. Fawcett
Don W. Fawcett Harvard University
Frances M. Brodsky
Frances M. Brodsky University College London
Yan W. Asmann
Yan W. Asmann Mayo Clinic
Schahram Akbarian
Schahram Akbarian Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jane B. Lian
Jane B. Lian University of Vermont
Eric W. Klee
Eric W. Klee Mayo Clinic
Gary S. Stein
Gary S. Stein University of Vermont
James F. Meschia
James F. Meschia Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Biology and Biochemistry goes beyond traditional research roles. Many online degree programs now cater to students seeking flexibility and diverse career options in healthcare, nutrition, and administration. For example, those interested in mental health can consider psych np programs, which prepare graduates for rewarding roles as psychiatric nurse practitioners.

Nutrition is another promising field closely tied to biochemistry. Students can fast-track their careers by enrolling in accelerated dietitian programs that combine science and health with online convenience. If you're interested in leadership and business within healthcare, pursuing the cheapest online mba healthcare management can open doors to administrative and management positions.

Careers in medical coding and health information management are also in demand. Choosing between cpc vs ccs certification is a key consideration for those aiming for specialized roles in healthcare data and billing. With so many flexible online pathways, students can tailor their education to specific career goals in the life sciences sector.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. Doxsey

Trending Scientists