World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eric W. Klee

Eric W. Klee

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 55 2274 2045 1119 993 271 10975

Eric W. Klee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric W. Klee between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric W. Klee published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 17.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 82 publications in 2023. 72 of the 448 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 82. Peak 82 publications in 2023. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 41 publications 2020: 46 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 82 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 34 publications
2001 2025

448 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric W. Klee: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 5
2008 5
2009 3
2010 5
2011 8
2012 8
2013 7
2014 17
2015 11
2016 14
2017 27
2018 26
2019 41
2020 46
2021 37
2022 27
2023 82
2024 38
2025 34
Total 448
Download as CSV

Eric W. Klee publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric W. Klee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 267–276 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 271 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54 271
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric W. Klee D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric W. Klee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116 55
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Eric W. Klee is a researcher affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with notable contributions in medicine. Over their career, they have produced a significant body of research focused on genetics and molecular biology, contributing to subfields such as genetics, molecular biology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cancer research, and surgery.

The scientist has concentrated on topics including genomics and rare diseases, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, cancer genomics and diagnostics, epigenetics and DNA methylation, chronic lymphocytic leukemia research, and RNA modifications and cancer.

Eric W. Klee's frequent publication venues include:

  • Genetics in Medicine Open
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Co-authors who have regularly collaborated with Eric W. Klee include:

  • Filippo Pinto e Vairo
  • Erica L. Macke
  • Brendan C. Lanpher
  • Gavin R. Oliver
  • Rory J. Olson

Some recent papers reflecting their research focus are:

  • Genome-wide detection of tandem DNA repeats that are expanded in autism, 2020, Nature
  • Pathogenic DDX3X Mutations Impair RNA Metabolism and Neurogenesis during Fetal Cortical Development, 2020, Neuron
  • Best practices for the analytical validation of clinical whole-genome sequencing intended for the diagnosis of germline disease, 2020, npj Genomic Medicine
  • Pathogenic SPTBN1 variants cause an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental syndrome, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • One in seven pathogenic variants can be challenging to detect by NGS: an analysis of 450,000 patients with implications for clinical sensitivity and genetic test implementation, 2021, Genetics in Medicine

Best Publications

  • Standards and Guidelines for Validating Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics Pipelines: A Joint Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and the College of American Pathologists.

    Somak Roy;Christopher Coldren;Arivarasan Karunamurthy;Nefize S. Kip

  • Integrated Genomic Characterization Reveals Novel, Therapeutically Relevant Drug Targets in FGFR and EGFR Pathways in Sporadic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

    Mitesh J. Borad;Mia D. Champion;Jan B. Egan;Winnie S. Liang

  • Preemptive genotyping for personalized medicine: design of the right drug, right dose, right time-using genomic data to individualize treatment protocol.

    Suzette J. Bielinski;Janet E. Olson;Jyotishman Pathak;Richard M. Weinshilboum

  • AMPA receptor GluA2 subunit defects are a cause of neurodevelopmental disorders

    Vincenzo Salpietro;Vincenzo Salpietro;Vincenzo Salpietro;Christine L Dixon;Hui Guo;Hui Guo;Oscar D Bello

  • Genome-wide detection of tandem DNA repeats that are expanded in autism.

    Brett Trost;Worrawat Engchuan;Charlotte M. Nguyen;Charlotte M. Nguyen;Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram

  • Maple syrup urine disease: mechanisms and management

    Patrick R Blackburn;Jennifer M Gass;Filippo Pinto e Vairo;Kristen M Farnham

  • Distinct epigenetic landscapes underlie the pathobiology of pancreatic cancer subtypes

    Gwen Lomberk;Yuna Blum;Rémy Nicolle;Asha Nair

  • Preemptive Pharmacogenomic Testing for Precision Medicine: A Comprehensive Analysis of Five Actionable Pharmacogenomic Genes Using Next-Generation DNA Sequencing and a Customized CYP2D6 Genotyping Cascade.

    Yuan Ji;Jennifer M. Skierka;Joseph H. Blommel;Brenda E. Moore

  • 3' tag digital gene expression profiling of human brain and universal reference RNA using Illumina Genome Analyzer

    Yan W. Asmann;Eric W. Klee;E. Aubrey Thompson;Edith A. Perez

  • Pathogenic DDX3X Mutations Impair RNA Metabolism and Neurogenesis during Fetal Cortical Development

    Ashley L. Lennox;Mariah L. Hoye;Ruiji Jiang;Bethany L. Johnson-Kerner

  • Sentieon DNASeq Variant Calling Workflow Demonstrates Strong Computational Performance and Accuracy.

    Katherine Irene Kendig;Saurabh Baheti;Matthew A Bockol;Travis M Drucker

  • Adrenomedullin is Up-regulated in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer and Causes Insulin Resistance in β Cells and Mice

    Gaurav Aggarwal;Vijaya Ramachandran;Naureen Javeed;Thiruvengadam Arumugam

  • Bioinformatics for Clinical Next Generation Sequencing

    Gavin R. Oliver;Steven N. Hart;Eric W. Klee

  • Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a broad panel of patient-derived xenografts reflects the diversity of glioblastoma

    Rachael A Vaubel;Shulan Tian;Dioval Remonde;Mark A. Schroeder

  • Clinical spectrum and genotype–phenotype associations of KCNA2-related encephalopathies

    Silvia Masnada;Ulrike B S Hedrich;Elena Gardella;Julian Schubert

  • Disruption of the ATXN1-CIC complex causes a spectrum of neurobehavioral phenotypes in mice and humans.

    Hsiang Chih Lu;Hsiang Chih Lu;Qiumin Tan;Maxime W.C. Rousseaux;Wei Wang

  • Global methylation profiling for risk prediction of prostate cancer

    Saswati Mahapatra;Eric W. Klee;Charles Y.F. Young;Zhifu Sun

  • LC-MS/MS Quantification of Zn-α2 Glycoprotein: A Potential Serum Biomarker for Prostate Cancer

    Olga P. Bondar;David R. Barnidge;Eric W. Klee;Brian J. Davis

  • Zebrafish: a model for the study of addiction genetics

    Eric W. Klee;Henning Schneider;Karl J. Clark;Margot A. Cousin

  • Confirming Variants in Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Testing by Sanger Sequencing

    Linnea M. Baudhuin;Susan A. Lagerstedt;Eric W. Klee;Numrah Fadra

Frequent Co-Authors

Raul Urrutia
Raul Urrutia Medical College of Wisconsin
Eric D. Wieben
Eric D. Wieben Mayo Clinic
George G. Klee
George G. Klee Mayo Clinic
Stephen C. Ekker
Stephen C. Ekker Mayo Clinic
George Vasmatzis
George Vasmatzis Mayo Clinic
Eva Morava
Eva Morava Mayo Clinic
Yan W. Asmann
Yan W. Asmann Mayo Clinic
Evan E. Eichler
Evan E. Eichler University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Molecular Biology can open doors to numerous allied health and science careers. For students interested in connecting biology with healthcare, there are accredited paths such as asha accredited online slp programs, which prepare graduates to become Speech-Language Pathologists. These programs are flexible and meet professional standards, making them ideal for career changers or those seeking online options.

If you have a non-SLP background, considering slp bridge programs is a practical step. These online bridge programs help biology and science graduates transition efficiently into Speech-Language Pathology graduate studies.

Many Molecular Biology graduates are also drawn to nursing careers. For a rapid entry into the field, accelerated bsn programs for non nurses offer a streamlined curriculum for those with prior degrees, preparing students for licensure and advanced healthcare roles.

Lastly, advanced practice roles such as Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner are in high demand nationwide. For information about potential earnings, see dnp pmhnp salary to gain insight into compensation trends by state.

Best Scientists Citing Eric W. Klee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles