World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
6777
World Ranking
8545
National Ranking
395

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
6817
World Ranking
8291
National Ranking
701

Stefan Pollmann publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Pollmann sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 154 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stefan Pollmann D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Pollmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Pollmann is affiliated with Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of neuroscience, with a primary focus on cognitive neuroscience. Their research encompasses various subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and molecular biology.

The main topics of Pollmann's work are:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Visual attention and saliency detection
  • Face recognition and perception
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Child and animal learning development

Pollmann has published numerous papers, including recent contributions such as:

  • "Anomalous visual experience is linked to perceptual uncertainty and visual imagery vividness" (2020) in Psychological Research
  • "The interactive effects of reward expectation and emotional interference on cognitive conflict control: An ERP study" (2021) in Physiology & Behavior
  • "Working memory and active sampling of the environment: Medial temporal contributions" (2022) in Handbook of Clinical Neurology
  • "Frontopolar activity carries feature information of novel stimuli during unconscious reweighting of selective attention" (2022) in Cortex
  • "Contextual-Cueing beyond the Initial Field of View-A Virtual Reality Experiment" (2020) in Brain Sciences

Pollmann frequently collaborates with co-authors Lasse Güldener, Nico Marek, Natalia Melnik, Lei Zheng, and Franziska Geringswald. Their research outputs have appeared in various publication venues, with a higher concentration in:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Brain Sciences
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Frontiers in Cognition

In addition to journal articles, Pollmann has contributed to book publications, including a chapter in the volume Spatial Learning and Attention Guidance (2020), published by Humana Press.

Best Publications

  • Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study.

    Anja Dove;Stefan Pollmann;Torsten Schubert;Christopher J. Wiggins

  • PyMVPA: A Python toolbox for multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data

    Michael Hanke;Yaroslav O. Halchenko;Yaroslav O. Halchenko;Per B. Sederberg;Stephen José Hanson

  • D1- Versus D2-Receptor Modulation of Visuospatial Working Memory in Humans

    U Müller;D Y von Cramon;S Pollmann

  • A universal role of the ventral striatum in reward-based learning:Evidence from human studies

    Reka Daniel;Reka Daniel;Stefan Pollmann

  • A high-resolution 7-Tesla fMRI dataset from complex natural stimulation with an audio movie

    Michael Hanke;Florian J. Baumgartner;Pierre Ibe;Falko R. Kaule

  • Covert Reorienting and Inhibition of Return: An Event-Related fMRI Study

    Jöran Lepsien;Stefan Pollmann

  • Dichotic listening in patients with splenial and nonsplenial callosal lesions.

    Stefan Pollmann;Marianne Maertens;D. Yves von Cramon;Joeran Lepsien

  • Separating distractor rejection and target detection in posterior parietal cortex--an event-related fMRI study of visual marking.

    Stefan Pollmann;Stefan Pollmann;Ralph Weidner;Glyn W. Humphreys;Christian N. L. Olivers

  • A Fronto-Posterior Network Involved in Visual Dimension Changes

    S. Pollmann;R. Weidner;H. J. Müller;D. Y. Von Cramon

  • Retinotopic activation in response to subjective contours in primary visual cortex.

    Marianne Maertens;Stefan Pollmann;Michael Hanke;Toralf Mildner

  • PyMVPA: A Unifying Approach to the Analysis of Neuroscientific Data.

    Michael Hanke;Yaroslav O. Halchenko;Yaroslav O. Halchenko;Per B. Sederberg;Emanuele Olivetti;Emanuele Olivetti

  • Object Working Memory and Visuospatial Processing: Functional Neuroanatomy Analyzed by Event-Related fMRI

    Stefan Pollmann;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Top-down Controlled Visual Dimension Weighting: An Event-related fMRI Study

    R. Weidner;S. Pollmann;H.J. Müller;D.Y. von Cramon

  • ERP and fMRI correlates of endogenous and exogenous focusing of visual-spatial attention

    E. Natale;C. A. Marzi;M. Girelli;E. F. Pavone

  • Comparing the Neural Basis of Monetary Reward and Cognitive Feedback during Information-Integration Category Learning

    Reka Daniel;Stefan Pollmann

  • Misleading contextual cues: how do they affect visual search?

    Angela A. Manginelli;Stefan Pollmann

  • Striatal activations signal prediction errors on confidence in the absence of external feedback.

    Reka Daniel;Stefan Pollmann

  • fMRI Reveals a Common Neural Substrate of Illusory and Real Contours in V1 after Perceptual Learning

    Marianne Maertens;Stefan Pollmann

  • Investigating the brain basis of facial expression perception using multi-voxel pattern analysis.

    Martin Wegrzyn;Martin Wegrzyn;Marcel Riehle;Kirsten Labudda;Friedrich Woermann

  • Contextual cueing impairment in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

    Franziska Geringswald;Anne Herbik;Michael B. Hoffmann;Stefan Pollmann

  • D1-versus D2-receptor modulation of visuospatial working memory in humans

    Ulrich Müller;D. Yves von Cramon;Stefan Pollmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Hermann J. Müller
Hermann J. Müller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alexander Kurz
Alexander Kurz Technical University of Munich
D. Yves von Cramon
D. Yves von Cramon Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Christian N. L. Olivers
Christian N. L. Olivers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Lihui Wang
Lihui Wang Royal Institute of Technology
Stefan Zysset
Stefan Zysset Max Planck Society
David G. Norris
David G. Norris Radboud University
Xiaolin Zhou
Xiaolin Zhou Peking University
Torsten Schubert
Torsten Schubert Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Kenneth Hugdahl
Kenneth Hugdahl University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students toward diverse professional fields such as psychology, social work, and counseling. If you’re considering expanding your expertise beyond neuroscience, several online degree options provide flexibility and a fast track into rewarding careers.

Those interested in mental health and clinical practice might look into accelerated online msw programs, which can lead to roles in social work and community support. Alternatively, pursuing a fast track psychology degree allows you to quickly build foundational knowledge for a range of psychology careers.

For those aiming for counseling licensure, choosing cacrep accredited counseling programs is critical, as CACREP accreditation ensures programs meet rigorous educational standards. If affordability is a top concern, consider researching an affordable master's in counseling online to balance quality education with manageable costs.

Each of these options provides a unique pathway for neuroscience enthusiasts to specialize in areas with strong job demand and opportunities to make a real difference.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Pollmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles