World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
75
Citations
26479
World Ranking
1983
National Ranking
180

John-Dylan Haynes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John-Dylan Haynes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 329 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John-Dylan Haynes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John-Dylan Haynes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John-Dylan Haynes is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research focuses primarily on Neuroscience and Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's work encompasses multiple significant topics including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Free Will and Agency

John-Dylan Haynes has contributed extensively to academic publications, appearing frequently in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 15 publications
  • Journal of Vision with 6 publications
  • Scientific Reports with 4 publications
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy with 3 publications
  • Brain with 3 publications

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Haynes include:

  • "Mediterranean Diet, Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers, and Brain Atrophy in Old Age," 2021, Neurology
  • "Novelty-Related fMRI Responses of Precuneus and Medial Temporal Regions in Individuals at Risk for Alzheimer Disease," 2022, Neurology
  • "Soluble TAM receptors sAXL and sTyro3 predict structural and functional protection in Alzheimer's disease," 2022, Neuron
  • "Improving 3D convolutional neural network comprehensibility via interactive visualization of relevance maps: evaluation in Alzheimer's disease," 2021, Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED)
  • "Neocortical substrates of feelings evoked with music in the ACC, insula, and somatosensory cortex," 2021, Scientific Reports

Frequent collaborations have been established with several researchers, including:

  • Klaus Fließbach
  • Oliver Peters
  • Josef Priller
  • Anja Schneider
  • Annika Spottke

Best Publications

  • Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain

    Chun Siong Soon;Marcel Brass;Hans-Jochen Heinze;John-Dylan Haynes

  • Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans

    John-Dylan Haynes;Geraint Rees

  • On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging.

    Stefan Haufe;Frank C. Meinecke;Kai Görgen;Sven Dähne

  • Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex

    John-Dylan Haynes;Geraint Rees

  • The Distributed Nature of Working Memory

    Thomas B. Christophel;P. Christiaan Klink;P. Christiaan Klink;Bernhard Spitzer;Pieter R. Roelfsema;Pieter R. Roelfsema;Pieter R. Roelfsema

  • Reading hidden intentions in the human brain.

    John-Dylan Haynes;Katsuyuki Sakai;Geraint Rees;Sam Gilbert

  • Concurrent TMS-fMRI and psychophysics reveal frontal influences on human retinotopic visual cortex

    Christian C. Ruff;Felix Blankenburg;Otto Bjoertomt;Sven Bestmann

  • The Decoding Toolbox (TDT): a versatile software package for multivariate analyses of functional imaging data.

    Martin Nikolai Hebart;Kai Görgen;John-Dylan Haynes

  • A Primer on Pattern-Based Approaches to fMRI: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives

    John-Dylan Haynes

  • Sound alters activity in human V1 in association with illusory visual perception.

    S. Watkins;L. Shams;S. Tanaka;John-Dylan Haynes

  • Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus

    John-Dylan Haynes;Ralf Deichmann;Geraint E. Rees

  • Predicting the stream of consciousness from activity in human visual cortex.

    John-Dylan Haynes;Geraint Rees

  • Connectivity-Based Parcellation of the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex

    Thorsten Kahnt;Luke J. Chang;Soyoung Q. Park;Soyoung Q. Park;Jakob Heinzle

  • Decoding the Contents of Visual Short-Term Memory from Human Visual and Parietal Cortex

    Thomas B. Christophel;Martin N. Hebart;Martin N. Hebart;John-Dylan Haynes

  • Odor quality coding and categorization in human posterior piriform cortex

    James D. Howard;Jane Plailly;Marcus Grueschow;Marcus Grueschow;Marcus Grueschow;John Dylan Haynes;John Dylan Haynes

  • Predicting free choices for abstract intentions

    Chun Siong Soon;Anna Hanxi He;Anna Hanxi He;Stefan Bode;Stefan Bode;Stefan Bode;John-Dylan Haynes

  • Neural Responses to Unattended Products Predict Later Consumer Choices

    Anita Tusche;Anita Tusche;Stefan Bode;Stefan Bode;Stefan Bode;John-Dylan Haynes;John-Dylan Haynes

  • The point of no return in vetoing self-initiated movements

    Matthias Schultze-Kraft;Matthias Schultze-Kraft;Daniel Birman;Marco Rusconi;Carsten Allefeld

  • Uncertainty and Surprise Jointly Predict Musical Pleasure and Amygdala, Hippocampus, and Auditory Cortex Activity

    Vincent Ka Ming Cheung;Peter M. C. Harrison;Lars Meyer;Marcus T. Pearce;Marcus T. Pearce

  • The neural code of reward anticipation in human orbitofrontal cortex

    Thorsten Kahnt;Thorsten Kahnt;Thorsten Kahnt;Jakob Heinzle;Soyoung Q. Park;Soyoung Q. Park;John Dylan Haynes

  • Flow of affective information between communicating brains

    Silke Anders;Silke Anders;Jakob Heinzle;Nikolaus Weiskopf;Thomas Ethofer

Frequent Co-Authors

Geraint Rees
Geraint Rees University College London
Stefan Bode
Stefan Bode University of Melbourne
Thorsten Kahnt
Thorsten Kahnt Northwestern University
Philipp Sterzer
Philipp Sterzer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Benjamin Blankertz
Benjamin Blankertz Technical University of Berlin
Oliver Peters
Oliver Peters German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Josef Priller
Josef Priller Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Emrah Düzel
Emrah Düzel German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John-Dylan Haynes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles