World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
45
Citations
8435
World Ranking
2816
National Ranking
693

Mitchell R. Tuinstra publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell R. Tuinstra sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 139 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Mitchell R. Tuinstra D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell R. Tuinstra sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the Crop Science Society of America (CSSA)
  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Society of Agronomy (ASA)

Best Publications

  • Parallel domestication of the Shattering1 genes in cereals

    Zhongwei Lin;Xianran Li;Laura M. Shannon;Cheng Ting Yeh

  • Community Resources and Strategies for Association Mapping in Sorghum

    Alexandra M. Casa;Gael Pressoir;Patrick J. Brown;Sharon E. Mitchell

  • Heterogeneous inbred family (HIF) analysis: a method for developing near-isogenic lines that differ at quantitative trait loci

    M. R. Tuinstra;G. Ejeta;P. B. Goldsbrough

  • Sensitivity of Grain Sorghum to High Temperature Stress during Reproductive Development

    P. V. V. Prasad;S. R. Pisipati;R. N. Mutava;M. R. Tuinstra

  • Genetic analysis of post-flowering drought tolerance and components of grain development in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench

    Mitchell R. Tuinstra;Edwin M. Grote;Peter B. Goldsbrough;Gebisa Ejeta

  • Phylogenetic diversity and relationships among sorghum accessions using SSRs and RAPDs

    H. A. Agrama;M. R. Tuinstra

  • Ethanol and lactic acid production as affected by sorghum genotype and location

    X Zhan;D Wang;M.R Tuinstra;S Bean

  • Identification of quantitative trait loci for nitrogen use efficiency in maize

    H.A.S. Agrama;A.G. Zakaria;F.B. Said;M. Tuinstra

  • Presence of tannins in sorghum grains is conditioned by different natural alleles of Tannin1

    Yuye Wu;Xianran Li;Wenwen Xiang;Chengsong Zhu

  • Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci Associated with Pre-Flowering Drought Tolerance in Sorghum

    M. R. Tuinstra;E. M. Grote;P. B. Goldsbrough;G. Ejeta

  • Grain sorghum is a viable feedstock for ethanol production

    D. Wang;S. Bean;J. McLaren;P. Seib

  • Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of accessions in the US historic sweet sorghum collection.

    Ming L. Wang;Chengsong Zhu;Noelle A. Barkley;Zhenbang Chen

  • Increased Power To Dissect Adaptive Traits in Global Sorghum Diversity Using a Nested Association Mapping Population

    Sophie Bouchet;Marcus O Olatoye;Sandeep R Marla;Ramasamy Perumal

  • Factors impacting ethanol production from grain sorghum in the dry-grind process.

    X. Wu;R. Zhao;S. R. Bean;P. A. Seib

  • Evaluation of near-isogenic sorghum lines contrasting for QTL markers associated with drought tolerance

    M. R. Tuinstra;G. Ejeta;Peter Goldsbrough

  • Sorghum, a healthy and gluten-free food for celiac patients as demonstrated by genome, biochemical, and immunochemical analyses.

    Paola Pontieri;Gianfranco Mamone;Salvatore De Caro;Mitch R. Tuinstra

  • Effects of Amylose, Corn Protein, and Corn Fiber Contents on Production of Ethanol from Starch-Rich Media

    X. Wu;R. Zhao;D. Wang;S. R. Bean

  • Characterization of sorghum genotypes for traits related to drought tolerance

    R.N. Mutava;P.V.V. Prasad;M.R. Tuinstra;K.D. Kofoid

  • Association Mapping for Grain Quality in a Diverse Sorghum Collection

    Sivakumar Sukumaran;Wenwen Xiang;Scott R. Bean;Jeffrey F. Pedersen

  • Half a Century of Studying Genotype × Environment Interactions in Plant Breeding Experiments

    Ani A. Elias;Kelly R. Robbins;Kelly R. Robbins;R.W. Doerge;Mitchell R. Tuinstra

  • Analysis of Stalk Rot Resistance and Genetic Diversity among Drought Tolerant Sorghum Genotypes

    Tesfaye T. Tesso;Larry E. Claflin;Mitchell R. Tuinstra

  • Estimation of pollen viability in grain sorghum.

    M. R. Tuinstra;J. Wedel

  • Genetic mapping of QTLs associated with greenbug resistance and tolerance in Sorghum bicolor.

    H. A. Agrama;G. E. Widle;J. C. Reese;L. R. Campbell

  • Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis of Endosperm Color and Carotenoid Content in Sorghum Grain

    Maria G. Salas Fernandez;Martha T. Hamblin;Li Li;William L. Rooney

  • Simulation Appraisal of the Adequacy of Number of Background Markers for Relationship Estimation in Association Mapping

    Jianming Yu;Zhiwu Zhang;Chengsong Zhu;Dindo A. Tabanao

Frequent Co-Authors

Kassim Al-Khatib
Kassim Al-Khatib University of California, Davis
Scott R. Bean
Scott R. Bean Agricultural Research Service
Jianming Yu
Jianming Yu Iowa State University
Tesfaye T. Tesso
Tesfaye T. Tesso Kansas State University
Scott C. Chapman
Scott C. Chapman University of Queensland
Edward S. Buckler
Edward S. Buckler Cornell University
Guihua Bai
Guihua Bai United States Department of Agriculture
James B. Holland
James B. Holland North Carolina State University
Sherry Flint-Garcia
Sherry Flint-Garcia United States Department of Agriculture
Patrick S. Schnable
Patrick S. Schnable Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mitchell R. Tuinstra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles