World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
4942
World Ranking
10207
National Ranking
1004

Michael Shayer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Shayer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael Shayer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Shayer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Shayer is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their academic career is centered around research and scholarship within a reputable European institution.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main topics of their research have been documented in the provided data.

There is no information available regarding awards or distinctions received by Michael Shayer.

The absence of listed research outputs and detailed topics suggests that publicly accessible bibliographic or citation records may be limited or not fully captured in this summary. Further exploration through academic databases or institutional profiles could provide additional details about their contributions.

Best Publications

  • Really Raising Standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement

    Philip Adey;Michael Shayer

  • Towards a science of science teaching

    Michael Shayer

  • An Exploration of Long-Term Far-Transfer Effects Following an Extended Intervention Program in the High School Science Curriculum

    Philip Adey;Michael Shayer

  • THE DISTRIBUTION OF PIAGETIAN STAGES OF THINKING IN BRITISH MIDDLE AND SECONDARY SCHOOL CHILDREN

    M. Shayer;D. E. Küchemann;H. Wylam

  • Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students

    Phillip Adey;Michael Shayer

  • Can we be intelligent about intelligence?: Why education needs the concept of plastic general ability

    Philip Adey;Benő Csapó;Andreas Demetriou;Jarkko Hautamäki

  • Towards a science of science teaching : cognitive development and curriculum demand

    Michael Shayer;Philip Adey

  • Thirty years on - a large anti-Flynn effect? The Piagetian test Volume & Heaviness norms 1975-2003.

    Michael Shayer;Denise Ginsburg;Robert Coe

  • THE DISTRIBUTION OF PIAGETIAN STAGES OF THINKING IN BRITISH MIDDLE AND SECONDARY SCHOOL CHILDREN. II—14- to 16-YEAR-OLDS AND SEX DIFFERENTIALS

    M. Shayer;H. Wylam

  • Not just Piaget; not just Vygotsky, and certainly not Vygotsky as alternative to Piaget

    Michael Shayer

  • Learning Intelligence: Cognitive Acceleration across the curriculum from 5 to 15 Years

    Michael Shayer;Phillip Adey

  • Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students IV: Three years after a two-year intervention

    Michael Shayer;Philip S. Adey

  • Cycles in speed-working memory-G relations: Towards a developmental–differential theory of the mind

    Andreas Demetriou;George Spanoudis;Michael Shayer;Antigoni Mouyi

  • The structure and scaling of concrete operational thought: three studies in four countries

    M. Shayer;A. Demetriou;Muhammad Pervez

  • The development of the concepts of heat and temperature in 10‐13 year‐olds

    Michael Shayer;Hugh Wylam

  • Relations between speed, working memory, and intelligence from preschool to adulthood: Structural equation modeling of 14 studies

    Andreas Demetriou;George Spanoudis;Michael Shayer;Sanne van der Ven

  • Cognitive Acceleration through Science Education II: Its Effects and Scope.

    Michael Shayer

  • Neo-Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development : Implications and Applications for Education

    Andreas Demetriou;Michael Shayer;Anastasia Efklides

  • Thirty years on – a large anti-Flynn effect/ (II): 13- and 14-year-olds. Piagetian tests of formal operations norms 1976–2006/7

    Michael Shayer;Denise Ginsburg

  • Mapping the dimensions of general intelligence: An integrated differential-developmental theory.

    Andreas Demetriou;Nikolaos Makris;George Spanoudis;Smaragda Kazi

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Demetriou
Andreas Demetriou University of Cyprus
George Spanoudis
George Spanoudis University of Cyprus
Anastasia Efklides
Anastasia Efklides Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Evelyn H. Kroesbergen
Evelyn H. Kroesbergen Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your psychology studies with an online degree opens up diverse career options. Social work is a particularly popular path for those who want to apply psychological principles to help communities and individuals. Many students are exploring online programs that combine flexible learning with fieldwork, making it easier to balance studies, work, and life.

When considering where to study, location can greatly influence available opportunities and specializations. For example, the top social work programs in Columbus are known for strong community engagement, while the top social work programs in Houston provide extensive multicultural and urban experience.

If you prefer smaller program settings or unique rural perspectives, you might be interested in the top social work programs in Idaho. Additionally, the top social work degrees in Jackson often focus on addressing southeastern regional needs and social issues.

No matter where you choose, pursuing these related online degrees can lead to careers in mental health, counseling, case management, and advocacy, blending academic knowledge with meaningful real-world impact.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Shayer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles