World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
40
Citations
8365
World Ranking
2015
National Ranking
853

Paul W. Mielke publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Mielke sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 249 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Paul W. Mielke D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Mielke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul W. Mielke is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their academic and research career is primarily connected with this institution.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues are available. Similarly, there is no information on book publications or specified fields of study and subfields documented for this researcher.

The absence of listed main fields of study or subfields makes it unclear which disciplines Paul W. Mielke specializes in, and there is also no data on main topics of work associated with their research output.

There are no records of awards won or any additional career milestones available in the current dataset.

Paul W. Mielke is currently active and not deceased.

Best Publications

  • Permutation Methods : A Distance Function Approach

    Paul W. Mielke;Kenneth J. Berry

  • Multi-response permutation procedures for a priori classifications

    Paul W Mielke;Kenneth J Berry;Earl S. Johnson

  • Lead concentrations in inner-city soils as a factor in the child lead problem.

    H W Mielke;J C Anderson;K J Berry;P W Mielke

  • A Generalization of Cohen's Kappa Agreement Measure to Interval Measurement and Multiple Raters

    Kenneth J. Berry;Paul W. Mielke

  • Data-dependent permutation techniques for the analysis of ecological data

    Mario E. Biondini;Paul W. Mielke;Kenneth J. Berry

  • Application of Multi-Response Permutation Procedures for Examining Seasonal Changes in Monthly Mean Sea-Level Pressure Patterns

    Paul W. Mielke;Kenneth J. Berry;Glenn W. Brier

  • The application of multivariate permutation methods based on distance functions in the earth sciences

    Unknown

  • Nonlinear association between soil lead and blood lead of children in metropolitan New Orleans, Louisiana: 2000-2005.

    Howard W. Mielke;Chris R. Gonzales;Eric Powell;Morten Jartun

  • Another Family of Distributions for Describing and Analyzing Precipitation Data

    Paul W. Mielke

  • On asymptotic non-normality of null distributions of mrpp statistics

    P W Mielke

  • Some generalized beta distributions of the second kind having desirable application features in hydrology and meteorology

    Paul W. Mielke;Earl S. Johnson

  • A class of nonparametric tests based on multiresponse permutation procedures

    Paul W. Mielke;Kenneth J. Berry;Peter J. Brockwell;James S. Williams

  • Non-metric statistical analyses: Some metric alternatives☆

    Paul W. Mielke

  • A Chronicle of Permutation Statistical Methods

    Kenneth J. Berry;Janis E. Johnston;Paul W. Mielke

  • A Monte Carlo investigation of the Fisher Z transformation for normal and nonnormal distributions.

    Kenneth J. Berry;Paul W. Mielke

  • An extended class of permutation techniques for matched pairs

    Unknown

  • Improvements in the Permutation Test for the Spatial Analysis of the Distribution of Artifacts into Classes

    Kenneth J. Berry;Kenneth L. Kvamme;Paul W. Mielke

  • Permutation Techniques Based on Euclidean Analysis Spaces: A New and Powerful Statistical Method for Ecological Research

    Unknown

  • Multiple metal accumulation as a factor in learning achievement within various New Orleans elementary school communities.

    Howard W. Mielke;Kenneth J. Berry;Paul W. Mielke;Eric T. Powell

  • The Fisher-Pitman permutation test: an attractive alternative to the F test.

    Kenneth J. Berry;Paul W. Mielke;Howard W. Mielke

  • Asymptotic Behavior of Two-Sample Tests Based on Powers of Ranks for Detecting Scale and Location Alternatives

    Paul W. Mielke

  • Permutation Tests for Common Locations Among Samples With Unequal Variances

    Paul W. Mielke;Kenneth J. Berry

  • Permutation methods

    Kenneth J. Berry;Janis E. Johnston;Paul W. Mielke

  • Asymptotic normality of MRPP statistics from invariance principles of u-statistics

    Federico J. O'Reilly;Paul W. Mielke

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard W. Mielke
Howard W. Mielke Tulane University
William M. Gray
William M. Gray Colorado State University
John A. Endler
John A. Endler Deakin University
Peter J. Brockwell
Peter J. Brockwell Colorado State University
Christopher W. Landsea
Christopher W. Landsea National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
William R. Cotton
William R. Cotton Colorado State University
James E. Dye
James E. Dye National Center for Atmospheric Research
Pranab Kumar Sen
Pranab Kumar Sen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andrew J. Heymsfield
Andrew J. Heymsfield National Center for Atmospheric Research
Thomas H. Vonder Haar
Thomas H. Vonder Haar Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring complementary online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many opt for specialized programs like a year long MBA programs which provide business acumen alongside analytical skills, enhancing leadership potential in technical fields.

Another popular choice is an online MBA accepting transfer credits. This flexibility allows students to accelerate their education by transferring relevant coursework, making it ideal for working professionals who want to balance career growth with academic advancement.

For those inclined towards big data, a master in data analytics equips graduates with cutting-edge skills in interpreting complex datasets. This degree pairs well with a math background and is in high demand across industries.

If accessibility is a concern, exploring the easiest MBA programs can be a practical approach. These programs often have more lenient admission criteria and flexible formats, allowing more students to advance their education with fewer barriers.

Best Scientists Citing Paul W. Mielke

Trending Scientists