World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
46
Citations
15770
World Ranking
1317
National Ranking
590

Lawrence Hubert publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence Hubert sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 151 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Lawrence Hubert D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence Hubert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1983 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)
  • 1981 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Lawrence Hubert is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their collaboration network includes co-authorship with S. Zhang, among others.

Throughout their career, they have received several fellowships from notable organizations. These include recognition as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1989, a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 1983, and a Fellowship at the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1981.

Best Publications

  • Comparing partitions

    Unknown

  • Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy.

    Lawrence Hubert;James Schultz

  • A general statistical framework for assessing categorical clustering in free recall.

    Lawrence J. Hubert;Joel R. Levin

  • Assignment methods in combinatorial data analysis

    Lawrence J. Hubert

  • Measuring the Power of Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

    Frank B. Baker;Lawrence J. Hubert

  • Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices.

    Lawrence Hubert;Phipps Arabie

  • Generalized Procedures for Evaluating Spatial Autocorrelation

    L. J. Hubert;R. G. Golledge;C. M. Costanzo

  • Methods for Evaluating Vocational Interest Structural Hypotheses.

    James Rounds;Terence J Tracey;Lawrence Hubert

  • Some Applications of Graph Theory to Clustering.

    Lawrence J. Hubert

  • Approximate Evaluation Techniques for the Single-Link and Complete-Link Hierarchical Clustering Procedures

    Lawrence Hubert

  • AN OVERVIEW OF COMBINATORIAL DATA ANALYSIS

    Phipps Arabie;Lawrence J. Hubert

  • Combinatorial data analysis : optimization by dynamic programming

    Lawrence Hubert;Phipps Arabie;Jacqueline Meulman

  • The Analysis of Social Interaction Data: A Nonparametric Technique

    Frank B. Baker;Lawrence J. Hubert

  • Min and max hierarchical clustering using asymmetric similarity measures

    Lawrence Hubert

  • 3 – N = Nonparametric Randomization Tests

    Joel R. Levin;Leonard A. Marascuilo;Lawrence J. Hubert

  • Two Purposes for Matrix Factorization: A Historical Appraisal

    Lawrence Hubert;Jacqueline Meulman;Willem Heiser

  • Combinatorial Data Analysis

    Phipps Arabie;Lawrence J. Hubert

  • A heuristic method for the comparison of related structures

    Lawrence J Hubert;Reginald G Golledge

  • SOME APPLICATIONS OF GRAPH THEORY AND RELATED NON‐METRIC TECHNIQUES TO PROBLEMS OF APPROXIMATE SERIATION: THE CASE OF SYMMETRIC PROXIMITY MEASURES

    Lawrence Hubert

  • Combinatorial data analysis: Association and partial association

    Lawrence J. Hubert

  • Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

    Hans‐Friedrich Köhn;Lawrence J. Hubert

Frequent Co-Authors

Reginald G. Golledge
Reginald G. Golledge University of California, Santa Barbara
James Rounds
James Rounds University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Joel R. Levin
Joel R. Levin University of Arizona
Howard Wainer
Howard Wainer National Board of Medical Examiners
Jeffrey S. Mogil
Jeffrey S. Mogil McGill University
Kyungsoon Chung
Kyungsoon Chung The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Jin Mo Chung
Jin Mo Chung The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Marshall Devor
Marshall Devor Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Terence J. G. Tracey
Terence J. G. Tracey Arizona State University
John K. Belknap
John K. Belknap Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways beyond traditional math roles. Many professionals enhance their skills with business-focused programs such as an easiest mba programs to get into, which often emphasize quantitative analysis, problem-solving, and strategic thinking.

Online education offers flexibility and accessibility, making it easier for math graduates to pursue an easiest mba online without disrupting their careers. These programs typically draw from mathematical concepts and can prepare students for leadership roles in finance, technology, or consulting.

For those aiming to specialize further, affordable options like the cheapest aacsb online dba provide advanced business administration knowledge with a strong research focus. This degree is ideal for blending mathematical expertise with high-level management skills.

In addition, the cheapest online masters in finance offers a cost-effective way to deepen understanding of financial modeling, risk analysis, and investment strategies, all grounded in mathematical principles. Choosing the right program depends on career goals and balancing affordability with quality education.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence Hubert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles