World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
68
Citations
18534
World Ranking
2421
National Ranking
1090

John K. Belknap publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John K. Belknap sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 143 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

John K. Belknap D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John K. Belknap sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

John K. Belknap was affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research activities and academic contributions are associated primarily with this institution.

During their career, John K. Belknap produced scholarly work that did not include recent published papers explicitly listed in available data. Information on topics explored, publication venues frequented, and frequent co-authors were not documented.

The scientist's main fields of study, subfields, and topics of work were not specified in the provided information.

No book publications or awards received by John K. Belknap were recorded or available for review.

Due to the absence of detailed publication records, frequent collaborators, and thematic areas, a comprehensive overview of research directions or academic achievements cannot be elaborated.

Best Publications

  • Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies.

    Jacqueline N. Crawley;John K. Belknap;Allan Collins;John C. Crabbe

  • The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits

    Gary A. Churchill;David C. Airey;Hooman Allayee;Joe M. Angel

  • Evaluation of a simple model of ethanol drinking to intoxication in C57BL/6J mice.

    Justin S. Rhodes;Karyn Best;John K. Belknap;Deborah A. Finn

  • Heritability of nociception I: responses of 11 inbred mouse strains on 12 measures of nociception.

    Jeffrey S. Mogil;Sonya G. Wilson;Karine Bon;Seo Eun Lee

  • Voluntary consumption of ethanol in 15 inbred mouse strains

    John K. Belknap;John C. Crabbe;E. R. Young

  • Genetic animal models of alcohol and drug abuse

    John C. Crabbe;John K. Belknap;Kari J. Buck

  • The nature and identification of quantitative trait loci: a community's view.

    Oduola Abiola;Joe M. Angel;Philip Avner;Alexander A. Bachmanov

  • Orphanin FQ is a functional anti-opioid peptide

    J.S Mogil;J.E Grisel;R.K Reinscheid;O Civelli

  • Regulation of Bone Mass in Mice by the Lipoxygenase Gene Alox15

    Robert F. Klein;John Allard;Zafrira Avnur;Tania Nikolcheva

  • In silico mapping of complex disease-related traits in mice.

    Andrew Grupe;Soren Germer;Jonathan Usuka;Dee Aud

  • Toward understanding the genetics of alcohol drinking through transcriptome meta-analysis.

    Megan K. Mulligan;Igor Ponomarev;Robert J. Hitzemann;John K. Belknap

  • Estimation of Genetic Correlation: Interpretation of Experiments Using Selectively Bred and Inbred Animals

    John C. Crabbe;Tamara J. Phillips;Ann Kosobud;John K. Belknap

  • Localization of genes affecting alcohol drinking in mice.

    Tamara J. Phillips;John C. Crabbe;Pamela Metten;John K. Belknap

  • Identifying genes for alcohol and drug sensitivity: recent progress and future directions.

    John C. Crabbe;Tamara J. Phillips;Kari J. Buck;Christopher L. Cunningham

  • Heritability of nociception II. 'Types' of nociception revealed by genetic correlation analysis.

    Jeffrey S Mogil;Sonya G Wilson;Karine Bon;Seo Eun Lee

  • Gender Specificity in the Genetic Determinants of Peak Bone Mass

    Eric S. Orwoll;John K. Belknap;Robert F. Klein

  • Functional antagonism of μ-, δ- and κ-opioid antinociception by orphanin FQ

    Jeffrey S. Mogil;Judith E. Grisel;Ge Zhangs;John K. Belknap

  • Quantitative trait loci affecting peak bone mineral density in mice

    Robert F. Klein;Steve R. Mitchell;Tamara J. Phillips;John K. Belknap

  • Type I and type II error rates for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping studies using recombinant inbred mouse strains.

    J. K. Belknap;S. R. Mitchell;L. A. O'Toole;M. L. Helms

  • Effect of Within-Strain Sample Size on QTL Detection and Mapping Using Recombinant Inbred Mouse Strains

    John K Belknap

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Crabbe
John C. Crabbe Oregon Health & Science University
Tamara J. Phillips
Tamara J. Phillips Oregon Health & Science University
Jeffrey S. Mogil
Jeffrey S. Mogil McGill University
Shannon K. McWeeney
Shannon K. McWeeney Oregon Health & Science University
Lu Lu
Lu Lu University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Robert W. Williams
Robert W. Williams University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Eric S. Orwoll
Eric S. Orwoll Oregon Health & Science University
Elissa J. Chesler
Elissa J. Chesler University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Boris Tabakoff
Boris Tabakoff University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Thomas E. Johnson
Thomas E. Johnson University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics opens doors to a wide range of online degree and career pathways in the growing field of healthcare. Many students interested in Genetics find value in supporting fields such as medical billing and coding, which are vital for effective healthcare management. For those seeking flexible and cost-effective training, consider exploring cheap medical billing and coding classes online to kickstart your healthcare career.

Nursing is another rewarding career option that frequently intersects with genetics, especially in patient care and genetic counseling. To start your journey, look into nursing programs with high acceptance rates, making it easier for aspiring healthcare professionals to enter the field.

For those interested in the organizational side of healthcare, healthcare administration programs and online health management degree pathways offer specialized training in leadership, policy, and the business aspects of healthcare. Together, these diverse programs provide multiple routes for Genetics graduates to advance their expertise and broaden their career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing John K. Belknap

Recently Published Articles