World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
33923
World Ranking
9302
National Ranking
4799

John C. Crabbe publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Crabbe sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 567 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John C. Crabbe D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Crabbe sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John C. Crabbe is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States and focuses on research in the fields of neuroscience, medicine, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans several subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, biological psychiatry, physiology, and pathology and forensic medicine.

The primary topics of Crabbe's research include neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, tryptophan and brain disorders, receptor mechanisms and signaling, alcohol consumption and health effects, stress responses and cortisol, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, and adipose tissue and metabolism.

Crabbe has coauthored publications with Pamela Metten, Angela R. Ozburn, Antonia M. Savarese, Kolter B. Grigsby, and Evan J. Firsick, reflecting repeated collaborations on related research projects. Frequent publication venues for Crabbe's work include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Addiction Biology, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, and Alcohol.

Among Crabbe's recent papers are the following:

  • Preclinical and clinical evidence for suppression of alcohol intake by apremilast (2023) in Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Targeting the Glucocorticoid Receptor Reduces Binge-Like Drinking in High Drinking in the Dark (HDID-1) Mice (2020) in Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • The impact of Drinking in the Dark (DID) procedural manipulations on ethanol intake in High Drinking in the Dark (HDID) mice (2021) in Alcohol
  • Ethanol-Related Behaviors in Mouse Lines Selectively Bred for Drinking to Intoxication (2021) in Brain Sciences
  • Tetracycline derivatives reduce binge alcohol consumption in High Drinking in the Dark mice (2020) in Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health

Best Publications

  • Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment.

    John C. Crabbe;Douglas Wahlsten;Bruce C. Dudek

  • Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies.

    Jacqueline N. Crawley;John K. Belknap;Allan Collins;John C. Crabbe

  • The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits

    Gary A. Churchill;David C. Airey;Hooman Allayee;Joe M. Angel

  • Evaluation of a simple model of ethanol drinking to intoxication in C57BL/6J mice.

    Justin S. Rhodes;Karyn Best;John K. Belknap;Deborah A. Finn

  • Voluntary consumption of ethanol in 15 inbred mouse strains

    John K. Belknap;John C. Crabbe;E. R. Young

  • Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction.

    Douglas Wahlsten;Pamela Metten;Tamara J. Phillips;Stephen L. Boehm

  • Genetic animal models of alcohol and drug abuse

    John C. Crabbe;John K. Belknap;Kari J. Buck

  • The nature and identification of quantitative trait loci: a community's view.

    Oduola Abiola;Joe M. Angel;Philip Avner;Alexander A. Bachmanov

  • Acute withdrawal, protracted abstinence and negative affect in alcoholism: Are they linked?

    Markus Heilig;Mark Egli;John C. Crabbe;Howard C. Becker

  • Elevated alcohol consumption in null mutant mice lacking 5-HT1B serotonin receptors

    John C. Crabbe;Tamara J. Phillips;Daniel J. Feller;René Hen

  • Increased vulnerability to cocaine in mice lacking the serotonin-1B receptor.

    Beatriz A. Rocha;Kimberly Scearce-Levie;José J. Lucas;José J. Lucas;Noboru Hiroi;Noboru Hiroi

  • Toward understanding the genetics of alcohol drinking through transcriptome meta-analysis.

    Megan K. Mulligan;Igor Ponomarev;Robert J. Hitzemann;John K. Belknap

  • Mouse inbred strain differences in ethanol drinking to intoxication

    J. S. Rhodes;M. M. Ford;C. H. Yu;L. L. Brown

  • Estimation of Genetic Correlation: Interpretation of Experiments Using Selectively Bred and Inbred Animals

    John C. Crabbe;Tamara J. Phillips;Ann Kosobud;John K. Belknap

  • Quantitative Trait Loci Involved in Genetic Predisposition to Acute Alcohol Withdrawal in Mice

    Kari Johnson Buck;Pamela Metten;John K. Belknap;John K. Belknap;John C. Crabbe;John C. Crabbe

  • Genetic Contributions to Addiction

    John C. Crabbe

  • Localization of genes affecting alcohol drinking in mice.

    Tamara J. Phillips;John C. Crabbe;Pamela Metten;John K. Belknap

  • Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades

    Douglas Wahlsten;Alexander Bachmanov;Deborah A. Finn;John C. Crabbe

  • Increased drinking during withdrawal from intermittent ethanol exposure is blocked by the CRF receptor antagonist D-Phe-CRF(12-41).

    Deborah A. Finn;Deborah A. Finn;Christopher Snelling;Andrea M. Fretwell;Michelle A. Tanchuck

  • Identifying genes for alcohol and drug sensitivity: recent progress and future directions.

    John C. Crabbe;Tamara J. Phillips;Kari J. Buck;Christopher L. Cunningham

Frequent Co-Authors

John K. Belknap
John K. Belknap Oregon Health & Science University
Deborah A. Finn
Deborah A. Finn Oregon Health & Science University
Tamara J. Phillips
Tamara J. Phillips Oregon Health & Science University
R. Adron Harris
R. Adron Harris The University of Texas at Austin
Justin S. Rhodes
Justin S. Rhodes University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Amanda J. Roberts
Amanda J. Roberts Scripps Research Institute
Shannon K. McWeeney
Shannon K. McWeeney Oregon Health & Science University
Robert W. Williams
Robert W. Williams University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Elissa J. Chesler
Elissa J. Chesler University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Alongside traditional medical degrees, there are a range of flexible online pathways for those interested in healthcare careers in the USA. Many students are now exploring programs that can provide entry into high-demand fields without the lengthy commitment of an MD.

For example, if you are interested in nursing but want to avoid extra entrance exams, some schools offer nursing programs without TEAS, providing a more streamlined admission process. For those passionate about healthcare management, an online education is also possible—an accredited health care administration degree online can prepare you for leadership positions in the industry.

Licensed nurses who want to advance their qualifications may benefit from ADN to MSN bridge programs, which are designed to facilitate a fast-track transition to advanced nursing roles. Additionally, those interested in nutrition and wellness can train to become dietitians through a nutritionist online degree.

These online degree options offer flexibility and accessibility, making healthcare careers more attainable for students across different backgrounds and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Crabbe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles