World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John C. Crabbe

John C. Crabbe

Last Updated:

D-Index & Metrics

?
Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9301 8729 4798 4437 567 33923

John C. Crabbe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John C. Crabbe between 1955 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John C. Crabbe published across 70 years, from 1955 to 2024, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 789 publications in 2010. 5 of the 1,248 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
250 500 750
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1955 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 789. Peak 789 publications in 2010. 1955: 2 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 6 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 4 publications 1980: 14 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 10 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 14 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 24 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 789 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications
1955 2024

1,248 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John C. Crabbe: publications per year, 1955 to 2024
Year Publications
1955 2
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 2
1971 0
1972 1
1973 6
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 4
1980 14
1981 4
1982 7
1983 10
1984 3
1985 5
1986 8
1987 6
1988 5
1989 7
1990 10
1991 14
1992 14
1993 11
1994 15
1995 9
1996 10
1997 8
1998 9
1999 15
2000 24
2001 15
2002 14
2003 22
2004 19
2005 19
2006 8
2007 7
2008 13
2009 6
2010 789
2011 10
2012 12
2013 9
2014 15
2015 6
2016 11
2017 7
2018 7
2019 7
2020 9
2021 6
2022 4
2023 2
2024 3
Total 1,248
Download as CSV

John C. Crabbe publications per year - data summary

  • John C. Crabbe, a Medicine scholar from Oregon Health & Science University, has 1,248 publications recorded across 70 years, from 1955 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1955 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 789 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1959, 1972, 1974, 1975 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 15 of the 70 years in the span carry no publications at all (1956, 1957, 1958, 1960 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 17.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 22.7 per year counting only the 55 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 24 publications, 2% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1955-1978: 16 publications (0.7 per year); 1979-2002: 241 publications (10.0 per year); 2003-2024: 991 publications (45.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

John C. Crabbe publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Crabbe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 567 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 567
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John C. Crabbe publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • John C. Crabbe, a Medicine scholar from Oregon Health & Science University, records 567 publications - the 68th percentile of the discipline.
  • 68% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than John C. Crabbe, and about 32% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and John C. Crabbe ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

John C. Crabbe D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Crabbe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 97
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

John C. Crabbe D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • John C. Crabbe, a Medicine scholar from Oregon Health & Science University, records 97 D-Index - the 55th percentile of the discipline.
  • 55% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than John C. Crabbe, and about 45% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and John C. Crabbe ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

John C. Crabbe is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States and focuses on research in the fields of neuroscience, medicine, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans several subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, biological psychiatry, physiology, and pathology and forensic medicine.

The primary topics of Crabbe's research include neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, tryptophan and brain disorders, receptor mechanisms and signaling, alcohol consumption and health effects, stress responses and cortisol, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, and adipose tissue and metabolism.

Crabbe has coauthored publications with Pamela Metten, Angela R. Ozburn, Antonia M. Savarese, Kolter B. Grigsby, and Evan J. Firsick, reflecting repeated collaborations on related research projects. Frequent publication venues for Crabbe's work include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Addiction Biology, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, and Alcohol.

Among Crabbe's recent papers are the following:

  • Preclinical and clinical evidence for suppression of alcohol intake by apremilast (2023) in Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Targeting the Glucocorticoid Receptor Reduces Binge-Like Drinking in High Drinking in the Dark (HDID-1) Mice (2020) in Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • The impact of Drinking in the Dark (DID) procedural manipulations on ethanol intake in High Drinking in the Dark (HDID) mice (2021) in Alcohol
  • Ethanol-Related Behaviors in Mouse Lines Selectively Bred for Drinking to Intoxication (2021) in Brain Sciences
  • Tetracycline derivatives reduce binge alcohol consumption in High Drinking in the Dark mice (2020) in Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health

Best Publications

  • Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment.

    John C. Crabbe;Douglas Wahlsten;Bruce C. Dudek

  • Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies.

    Jacqueline N. Crawley;John K. Belknap;Allan Collins;John C. Crabbe

  • The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits

    Gary A. Churchill;David C. Airey;Hooman Allayee;Joe M. Angel

  • Evaluation of a simple model of ethanol drinking to intoxication in C57BL/6J mice.

    Justin S. Rhodes;Karyn Best;John K. Belknap;Deborah A. Finn

  • Voluntary consumption of ethanol in 15 inbred mouse strains

    John K. Belknap;John C. Crabbe;E. R. Young

  • Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction.

    Douglas Wahlsten;Pamela Metten;Tamara J. Phillips;Stephen L. Boehm

  • Genetic animal models of alcohol and drug abuse

    John C. Crabbe;John K. Belknap;Kari J. Buck

  • The nature and identification of quantitative trait loci: a community's view.

    Oduola Abiola;Joe M. Angel;Philip Avner;Alexander A. Bachmanov

  • Acute withdrawal, protracted abstinence and negative affect in alcoholism: Are they linked?

    Markus Heilig;Mark Egli;John C. Crabbe;Howard C. Becker

  • Elevated alcohol consumption in null mutant mice lacking 5-HT1B serotonin receptors

    John C. Crabbe;Tamara J. Phillips;Daniel J. Feller;René Hen

  • Increased vulnerability to cocaine in mice lacking the serotonin-1B receptor.

    Beatriz A. Rocha;Kimberly Scearce-Levie;José J. Lucas;José J. Lucas;Noboru Hiroi;Noboru Hiroi

  • Toward understanding the genetics of alcohol drinking through transcriptome meta-analysis.

    Megan K. Mulligan;Igor Ponomarev;Robert J. Hitzemann;John K. Belknap

  • Mouse inbred strain differences in ethanol drinking to intoxication

    J. S. Rhodes;M. M. Ford;C. H. Yu;L. L. Brown

  • Estimation of Genetic Correlation: Interpretation of Experiments Using Selectively Bred and Inbred Animals

    John C. Crabbe;Tamara J. Phillips;Ann Kosobud;John K. Belknap

  • Quantitative Trait Loci Involved in Genetic Predisposition to Acute Alcohol Withdrawal in Mice

    Kari Johnson Buck;Pamela Metten;John K. Belknap;John K. Belknap;John C. Crabbe;John C. Crabbe

  • Genetic Contributions to Addiction

    John C. Crabbe

  • Localization of genes affecting alcohol drinking in mice.

    Tamara J. Phillips;John C. Crabbe;Pamela Metten;John K. Belknap

  • Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades

    Douglas Wahlsten;Alexander Bachmanov;Deborah A. Finn;John C. Crabbe

  • Increased drinking during withdrawal from intermittent ethanol exposure is blocked by the CRF receptor antagonist D-Phe-CRF(12-41).

    Deborah A. Finn;Deborah A. Finn;Christopher Snelling;Andrea M. Fretwell;Michelle A. Tanchuck

  • Identifying genes for alcohol and drug sensitivity: recent progress and future directions.

    John C. Crabbe;Tamara J. Phillips;Kari J. Buck;Christopher L. Cunningham

Frequent Co-Authors

John K. Belknap
John K. Belknap Oregon Health & Science University
Deborah A. Finn
Deborah A. Finn Oregon Health & Science University
Tamara J. Phillips
Tamara J. Phillips Oregon Health & Science University
R. Adron Harris
R. Adron Harris The University of Texas at Austin
Justin S. Rhodes
Justin S. Rhodes University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Amanda J. Roberts
Amanda J. Roberts Scripps Research Institute
Shannon K. McWeeney
Shannon K. McWeeney Oregon Health & Science University
Robert W. Williams
Robert W. Williams University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Elissa J. Chesler
Elissa J. Chesler University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Alongside traditional medical degrees, there are a range of flexible online pathways for those interested in healthcare careers in the USA. Many students are now exploring programs that can provide entry into high-demand fields without the lengthy commitment of an MD.

For example, if you are interested in nursing but want to avoid extra entrance exams, some schools offer nursing programs without TEAS, providing a more streamlined admission process. For those passionate about healthcare management, an online education is also possible—an accredited health care administration degree online can prepare you for leadership positions in the industry.

Licensed nurses who want to advance their qualifications may benefit from ADN to MSN bridge programs, which are designed to facilitate a fast-track transition to advanced nursing roles. Additionally, those interested in nutrition and wellness can train to become dietitians through a nutritionist online degree.

These online degree options offer flexibility and accessibility, making healthcare careers more attainable for students across different backgrounds and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Crabbe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles