World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6454
World Ranking
7946
National Ranking
4261

Patrick M. Markey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick M. Markey sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Patrick M. Markey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick M. Markey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick M. Markey is affiliated with Villanova University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas primarily within psychology and social sciences, reflecting a focus on understanding human behavior in various social and forensic contexts.

Their academic contributions include work published across several research venues. Notable publication venues include:

  • Radiopaedia.org
  • Professional Psychology Research and Practice
  • The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science

Markey's research is concentrated in fields such as psychology and social sciences, with a significant portion dedicated to subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, education, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their work covers a range of topics with specific emphasis on:

  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending
  • Attachment and relationship dynamics
  • Child development and digital technology
  • Impact of technology on adolescents
  • Family dynamics and relationships
  • Media influence and health

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Markey, several focus on psychological science and forensic contexts, including:

  • "Deception Cues During High-Risk Situations: 911 Homicide Calls," 2022, published in Psychological Science
  • "Reexamining the Findings of the American Psychological Association's 2015 Task Force on Violent Media: A Meta-Analysis," 2020, published in Perspectives on Psychological Science (co-authored by Christopher J. Ferguson)
  • "Like this meta-analysis: Screen media and mental health," 2021, published in Professional Psychology Research and Practice (co-authored by Christopher J. Ferguson)
  • "There is no evidence that time spent on social media is correlated with adolescent mental health problems: Findings from a meta-analysis," 2024, published in Professional Psychology Research and Practice (co-authored by Christopher J. Ferguson)
  • "Partner-objectification in romantic relationships: A dyadic approach," 2020, published in Personal Relationships (co-authored by Elizabeth A. Mahar)

Markey has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Erica B. Slotter
  • Brooke Berry
  • Jennie Dapice
  • Erika Feeney
  • Samantha Goldman

Best Publications

  • Scholars’ open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal

    Espen Aarseth;Anthony M. Bean;Huub Boonen;Michelle Colder Carras

  • A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Christopher J. Ferguson;Michelle Colder Carras;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther

  • Complementarity of Interpersonal Behaviors in Dyadic Interactions

    Patrick M. Markey;David C. Funder;Daniel J. Ozer

  • Relations Between Body Image and Dieting Behaviors: An Examination of Gender Differences

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • Vulnerability to Violent Video Games: A Review and Integration of Personality Research:

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey

  • Violent video games and real-world violence: Rhetoric versus data.

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey;Juliana E. French

  • Correlates of Young Women's Interest in Obtaining Cosmetic Surgery

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • Bystander intervention in computer-mediated communication

    P.M Markey

  • Romantic ideals, romantic obtainment, and relationship experiences The complementarity of interpersonal traits among romantic partners

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey

  • Violent video games and anger as predictors of aggression

    Gary W. Giumetti;Patrick M. Markey

  • A correlational and experimental examination of reality television viewing and interest in cosmetic surgery.

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • Youth Bulges in Communities: The Effects of Age Structure on Adolescent Civic Knowledge and Civic Participation

    Daniel Hart;Robert Atkins;Patrick Markey;James Youniss

  • A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC.

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey

  • Romantic Relationships and Health: An Examination of Individuals’ Perceptions of their Romantic Partners’ Influences on their Health

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey;Heather Fishman Gray

  • Interpersonal Perception in Internet Chat Rooms

    Patrick M. Markey;Shannon M. Wells

  • Interpersonal predictors of dieting practices among married couples.

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey;Leann L. Birch

  • Romantic Relationships and Body Satisfaction Among Young Women

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • The role of extraversion and neuroticism in influencing anxiety following computer-mediated interactions

    Lindsay Rice;Patrick M. Markey

  • A preliminary validation of preadolescents' self-reports using the Five-Factor Model of personality

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey;Barbara J. Tinsley;Andrea J. Ericksen

  • An examination of psychoticism and motion capture controls as moderators of the effects of violent video games

    Patrick M. Markey;Kelly Scherer

  • A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Christopher J. Ferguson;Michelle Colder Carras;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther

Frequent Co-Authors

Charlotte N. Markey
Charlotte N. Markey Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Christopher J. Ferguson
Christopher J. Ferguson Stetson University
Leann L. Birch
Leann L. Birch University of Georgia
Andrew K. Przybylski
Andrew K. Przybylski University of Oxford
Cheryl L. Sisk
Cheryl L. Sisk Michigan State University
Emily B. Ansell
Emily B. Ansell Pennsylvania State University
Vladan Starcevic
Vladan Starcevic University of Sydney
Adriano Schimmenti
Adriano Schimmenti Università degli Studi di Enna Kore
Thorsten Quandt
Thorsten Quandt University of Münster
Mary Beth Oliver
Mary Beth Oliver Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and career pathways. Many graduates are drawn to specialized fields, such as speech-language pathology, which blend psychology with clinical practice. These professions often require state-specific certification, as standards and processes can vary widely.

For example, if you're interested in becoming a speech therapist in Utah, you will need to complete a relevant graduate program and obtain supervised clinical experience. Similarly, those pursuing a career in Vermont should review the Vermont speech pathologist certification requirements to ensure eligibility.

Each state imposes unique guidelines. In Virginia, aspiring professionals should be aware of the Virginia speech pathologist certification requirements. For students planning to practice in the Pacific Northwest, reviewing Washington slp certification requirements is essential.

Exploring these pathways helps psychology students align their academic journey with fulfilling, high-demand careers in allied health and education.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick M. Markey

Trending Scientists