World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7946 7415 4261 3875 96 6454

Patrick M. Markey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick M. Markey between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick M. Markey published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2013. 11 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2013. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
2000 2025

110 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick M. Markey: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 4
2003 2
2004 3
2005 3
2006 5
2007 5
2008 3
2009 5
2010 5
2011 5
2012 5
2013 8
2014 5
2015 7
2016 4
2017 8
2018 4
2019 2
2020 6
2021 1
2022 4
2023 2
2024 6
2025 5
Total 110
Download as CSV

Patrick M. Markey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick M. Markey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 96
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick M. Markey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick M. Markey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patrick M. Markey is affiliated with Villanova University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas primarily within psychology and social sciences, reflecting a focus on understanding human behavior in various social and forensic contexts.

Their academic contributions include work published across several research venues. Notable publication venues include:

  • Radiopaedia.org
  • Professional Psychology Research and Practice
  • The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science

Markey's research is concentrated in fields such as psychology and social sciences, with a significant portion dedicated to subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, education, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their work covers a range of topics with specific emphasis on:

  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending
  • Attachment and relationship dynamics
  • Child development and digital technology
  • Impact of technology on adolescents
  • Family dynamics and relationships
  • Media influence and health

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Markey, several focus on psychological science and forensic contexts, including:

  • "Deception Cues During High-Risk Situations: 911 Homicide Calls," 2022, published in Psychological Science
  • "Reexamining the Findings of the American Psychological Association's 2015 Task Force on Violent Media: A Meta-Analysis," 2020, published in Perspectives on Psychological Science (co-authored by Christopher J. Ferguson)
  • "Like this meta-analysis: Screen media and mental health," 2021, published in Professional Psychology Research and Practice (co-authored by Christopher J. Ferguson)
  • "There is no evidence that time spent on social media is correlated with adolescent mental health problems: Findings from a meta-analysis," 2024, published in Professional Psychology Research and Practice (co-authored by Christopher J. Ferguson)
  • "Partner-objectification in romantic relationships: A dyadic approach," 2020, published in Personal Relationships (co-authored by Elizabeth A. Mahar)

Markey has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Erica B. Slotter
  • Brooke Berry
  • Jennie Dapice
  • Erika Feeney
  • Samantha Goldman

Best Publications

  • Scholars’ open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal

    Espen Aarseth;Anthony M. Bean;Huub Boonen;Michelle Colder Carras

  • A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Christopher J. Ferguson;Michelle Colder Carras;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther

  • Complementarity of Interpersonal Behaviors in Dyadic Interactions

    Patrick M. Markey;David C. Funder;Daniel J. Ozer

  • Relations Between Body Image and Dieting Behaviors: An Examination of Gender Differences

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • Vulnerability to Violent Video Games: A Review and Integration of Personality Research:

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey

  • Violent video games and real-world violence: Rhetoric versus data.

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey;Juliana E. French

  • Correlates of Young Women's Interest in Obtaining Cosmetic Surgery

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • Bystander intervention in computer-mediated communication

    P.M Markey

  • Romantic ideals, romantic obtainment, and relationship experiences The complementarity of interpersonal traits among romantic partners

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey

  • Violent video games and anger as predictors of aggression

    Gary W. Giumetti;Patrick M. Markey

  • A correlational and experimental examination of reality television viewing and interest in cosmetic surgery.

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • Youth Bulges in Communities: The Effects of Age Structure on Adolescent Civic Knowledge and Civic Participation

    Daniel Hart;Robert Atkins;Patrick Markey;James Youniss

  • A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC.

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey

  • Romantic Relationships and Health: An Examination of Individuals’ Perceptions of their Romantic Partners’ Influences on their Health

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey;Heather Fishman Gray

  • Interpersonal Perception in Internet Chat Rooms

    Patrick M. Markey;Shannon M. Wells

  • Interpersonal predictors of dieting practices among married couples.

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey;Leann L. Birch

  • Romantic Relationships and Body Satisfaction Among Young Women

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • The role of extraversion and neuroticism in influencing anxiety following computer-mediated interactions

    Lindsay Rice;Patrick M. Markey

  • A preliminary validation of preadolescents' self-reports using the Five-Factor Model of personality

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey;Barbara J. Tinsley;Andrea J. Ericksen

  • An examination of psychoticism and motion capture controls as moderators of the effects of violent video games

    Patrick M. Markey;Kelly Scherer

  • A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Christopher J. Ferguson;Michelle Colder Carras;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther

Frequent Co-Authors

Charlotte N. Markey
Charlotte N. Markey Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Christopher J. Ferguson
Christopher J. Ferguson Stetson University
Leann L. Birch
Leann L. Birch University of Georgia
Andrew K. Przybylski
Andrew K. Przybylski University of Oxford
Cheryl L. Sisk
Cheryl L. Sisk Michigan State University
Emily B. Ansell
Emily B. Ansell Pennsylvania State University
Vladan Starcevic
Vladan Starcevic University of Sydney
Adriano Schimmenti
Adriano Schimmenti Università degli Studi di Enna Kore
Thorsten Quandt
Thorsten Quandt University of Münster
Mary Beth Oliver
Mary Beth Oliver Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and career pathways. Many graduates are drawn to specialized fields, such as speech-language pathology, which blend psychology with clinical practice. These professions often require state-specific certification, as standards and processes can vary widely.

For example, if you're interested in becoming a speech therapist in Utah, you will need to complete a relevant graduate program and obtain supervised clinical experience. Similarly, those pursuing a career in Vermont should review the Vermont speech pathologist certification requirements to ensure eligibility.

Each state imposes unique guidelines. In Virginia, aspiring professionals should be aware of the Virginia speech pathologist certification requirements. For students planning to practice in the Pacific Northwest, reviewing Washington slp certification requirements is essential.

Exploring these pathways helps psychology students align their academic journey with fulfilling, high-demand careers in allied health and education.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick M. Markey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles