World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
7717
World Ranking
9090
National Ranking
4821

Charlotte N. Markey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte N. Markey sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Charlotte N. Markey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte N. Markey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charlotte N. Markey is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Psychology, Health Professions, and Medicine. Within these broad areas, their work focuses particularly on subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, and Marketing.

The primary topics addressed in their research include Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Obesity and Health Practices, Obesity, Physical Activity, and Diet, Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Breastfeeding Practices and Influences, and the Impact of Technology on Adolescents.

Frequent coauthors in their publications are Kristin J. August, Meghan M. Gillen, Gianluca Lo Coco, Diane L. Rosenbaum, and Jacinthe Dion. Their collaborative work has often appeared in journals including Body Image, Journal of Health Psychology, Appetite, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, and Frontiers in Psychology.

Recent papers authored by Charlotte N. Markey include:

  • "Assessing positive body image, body satisfaction, weight bias, and appearance comparison in emerging adults: A cross-validation study across eight countries" (2020) published in Body Image
  • "Breastfeeding, body image, and weight control behavior among postpartum women" (2021) published in Body Image
  • "Feeling let down: An investigation of breastfeeding expectations, appreciation of body functionality, self-compassion, and depression symptoms" (2020) published in Appetite
  • "A cross-country examination of emotional eating, restrained eating and intuitive eating: Measurement Invariance across eight countries" (2020) published in Body Image
  • "A survey of eating styles in eight countries: Examining restrained, emotional, intuitive eating and their correlates" (2022) published in British Journal of Health Psychology

Charlotte N. Markey has also contributed to book publications. Notable titles include "Being You" (2022) and "The Body Image Book for Girls" (2020), both published by Cambridge University Press, as well as "Imagen corporal, salud y educación." (2023) published by Dykinson eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Child Feeding Questionnaire: A Measure of Parental Attitudes, Beliefs and Practices About Child Feeding and Obesity Proneness

    L.L Birch;J.O Fisher;K Grimm-Thomas;C.N Markey

  • A Longitudinal Examination of Patterns in Girls' Weight Concerns and Body Dissatisfaction from Ages 5 to 9 Years

    Kirsten Krahnstoever Davison;Charlotte N. Markey;Leann L. Birch

  • Invited Commentary: Why Body Image is Important to Adolescent Development

    Charlotte N. Markey

  • Etiology of body dissatisfaction and weight concerns among 5-year-old girls

    K.K. Davison;C.N. Markey;L.L. Birch

  • Relations Between Body Image and Dieting Behaviors: An Examination of Gender Differences

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • Vulnerability to Violent Video Games: A Review and Integration of Personality Research:

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey

  • Violent video games and real-world violence: Rhetoric versus data.

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey;Juliana E. French

  • Correlates of Young Women's Interest in Obtaining Cosmetic Surgery

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • Romantic ideals, romantic obtainment, and relationship experiences The complementarity of interpersonal traits among romantic partners

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey

  • A correlational and experimental examination of reality television viewing and interest in cosmetic surgery.

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC.

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey

  • Romantic Relationships and Health: An Examination of Individuals’ Perceptions of their Romantic Partners’ Influences on their Health

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey;Heather Fishman Gray

  • Interpersonal predictors of dieting practices among married couples.

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey;Leann L. Birch

  • Culture and the development of eating disorders: a tripartite model.

    Charlotte N Markey

  • Romantic Relationships and Body Satisfaction Among Young Women

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey

  • The Role of Body Image and Depression in Tanning Behaviors and Attitudes

    Meghan M. Gillen;Charlotte N. Markey

  • A preliminary validation of preadolescents' self-reports using the Five-Factor Model of personality

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey;Barbara J. Tinsley;Andrea J. Ericksen

  • Understanding Women's Body Satisfaction: The Role of Husbands.

    Charlotte N. Markey;Patrick M. Markey;Leann L. Birch

  • A review of research linking body image and sexual well-being

    Unknown

  • Children’s Behavioral Manifestations of the Five-Factor Model of Personality

    Patrick M. Markey;Charlotte N. Markey;Barbara J. Tinsley

  • Personality, puberty, and preadolescent girls' risky behaviors: Examining the predictive value of the Five-Factor Model of personality

    Charlotte N Markey;Patrick M Markey;Barbara J Tinsley

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick M. Markey
Patrick M. Markey Villanova University
Leann L. Birch
Leann L. Birch University of Georgia
Cheryl L. Sisk
Cheryl L. Sisk Michigan State University
Kirsten K. Davison
Kirsten K. Davison Boston College
Michael C. Neale
Michael C. Neale Virginia Commonwealth University
Emily A. Butler
Emily A. Butler University of Arizona
Christopher J. Hopwood
Christopher J. Hopwood University of Zurich
S. Alexandra Burt
S. Alexandra Burt Michigan State University
Howard S. Friedman
Howard S. Friedman University of California, Riverside
William G. Iacono
William G. Iacono University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Psychology in the USA, there are many online degrees and career pathways to consider. Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) is a popular option for those who want to help individuals, couples, and families overcome a variety of emotional and relationship challenges.

Becoming an MFT requires specialized education and state certification. For example, mft requirements in Omaha emphasize the need for a graduate degree and supervised clinical experience. Requirements can vary from place to place, so researching licensure steps is essential. If you want to know how to become a marriage and family therapist in Orlando, you'll need to complete specific coursework and internships recognized by local boards.

In other locations, like Philadelphia, mft requirements in Philadelphia may have their own credentialing process and examination criteria. Similarly, understanding the Phoenix mft certification requirements will help ensure you meet all the local standards for practice.

Online programs can provide flexibility and access to accredited degrees that satisfy state requirements, making it easier to pursue your chosen career path—no matter your location.

Best Scientists Citing Charlotte N. Markey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles