World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5986 5569 3246 2950 146 7868

Katie A. Loth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Katie A. Loth between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Katie A. Loth published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 19 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 11 publications
2008 2025

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Katie A. Loth: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 1
2010 1
2011 7
2012 7
2013 8
2014 9
2015 11
2016 15
2017 8
2018 13
2019 11
2020 13
2021 21
2022 11
2023 12
2024 8
2025 11
Total 168
Download as CSV

Katie A. Loth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katie A. Loth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 146 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 146
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Katie A. Loth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katie A. Loth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Katie A. Loth is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions, with a significant focus on subfields such as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The main topics of Katie A. Loth's work include:

  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on food insecurity, eating disorders, and the impact of socioeconomic factors on health. Notable papers include:

  • Food Insecurity and Eating Disorders: a Review of Emerging Evidence (2020), published in Current Psychiatry Reports
  • Associations between parental stress, parent feeding practices, and child eating behaviors within the context of food insecurity (2020), published in Preventive Medicine Reports
  • Associations between severe food insecurity and disordered eating behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood: Findings from a 10-year longitudinal study (2021), published in Preventive Medicine
  • Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress, mood, and substance use among young adults in the greater Minneapolis-St. Paul area: Findings from project EAT (2021), published in Social Science & Medicine
  • Body dissatisfaction and disordered eating are prevalent problems among U.S. young people from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds: Findings from the EAT 2010-2018 study (2021), published in Eating Behaviors

Katie A. Loth has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
  • Jerica M. Berge
  • Amanda Trofholz
  • Allan Tate
  • Vivienne M. Hazzard

Their work has been published in a variety of journals, with frequent publications in the following venues:

  • Appetite
  • Eating Behaviors
  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • Preventive Medicine
  • The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

The intersection of public health, clinical psychology, and nutrition is evident throughout the research, as is a consistent emphasis on the relationships between food insecurity, eating behaviors, and mental and physical health outcomes across diverse populations.

Best Publications

  • Dieting and Disordered Eating Behaviors from Adolescence to Young Adulthood: Findings from a 10-Year Longitudinal Study

    Dianne R NeumarkSztainer;Melanie M Wall;Nicole I Larson;Marla E Eisenberg

  • Parenting Style as a Predictor of Adolescent Weight and Weight-Related Behaviors

    Jerica M Berge;Melanie Wall;Katie Loth;Dianne R Neumark-Sztainer

  • Family Functioning: Associations With Weight Status, Eating Behaviors, and Physical Activity in Adolescents

    Jerica M. Berge;Melanie Wall;Nicole Larson;Katie A. Loth

  • Intuitive eating in young adults. Who is doing it, and how is it related to disordered eating behaviors?

    Kara N. Denny;Katie Loth;Marla E Eisenberg;Dianne R Neumark-Sztainer

  • Feeding a Family in a Recession: Food Insecurity Among Minnesota Parents

    Meg Bruening;Richard F Maclehose;Katie Loth;Mary Story

  • Parent conversations about healthful eating and weight associations with adolescent disordered eating behaviors

    Jerica M Berge;Richard F Maclehose;Katie Loth;Marla E Eisenberg

  • Food Insecurity and Eating Disorders: a Review of Emerging Evidence.

    Vivienne M. Hazzard;Katie A. Loth;Laura Hooper;Carolyn Black Becker

  • Predictors of Dieting and Disordered Eating Behaviors From Adolescence to Young Adulthood

    Katie Loth;Richard F Maclehose;Michaela Bucchianeri;Scott J Crow

  • Food-Related Parenting Practices and Adolescent Weight Status: A Population-Based Study

    Katie A. Loth;Richard F. MacLehose;Jayne A. Fulkerson;Scott Crow

  • Preventing Eating Disorder Pathology: Common and Unique Features of Successful Eating Disorders Prevention Programs

    Anna C. Ciao;Katie Loth;Dianne R Neumark-Sztainer

  • Eat this, not that! Parental demographic correlates of food-related parenting practices

    Katie A. Loth;Richard F. MacLehose;Jayne A. Fulkerson;Scott Crow

  • Food availability, modeling and restriction: How are these different aspects of the family eating environment related to adolescent dietary intake?

    Katie Loth;Richard F Maclehose;Nicole I Larson;Jerica M Berge

  • Family meals. Associations with weight and eating behaviors among mothers and fathers.

    Jerica M. Berge;Richard F. MacLehose;Katie A. Loth;Marla E. Eisenberg

  • What's for dinner? Types of food served at family dinner differ across parent and family characteristics

    Dianne R Neumark-Sztainer;Richard F Maclehose;Katie Loth;Jayne Fulkerson

  • Body dissatisfaction: Do associations with disordered eating and psychological well-being differ across race/ethnicity in adolescent girls and boys?

    Michaela M. Bucchianeri;Nisha Fernandes;Katie Loth;Peter J. Hannan

  • Body satisfaction during pregnancy.

    Katie Loth;Katherine W. Bauer;Melanie Wall;Jerica M Berge

  • The unique and additive associations of family functioning and parenting practices with disordered eating behaviors in diverse adolescents

    Jerica M. Berge;Melanie Wall;Nicole Larson;Marla E. Eisenberg

  • Parenting style and child feeding practices: potential mitigating factors in the etiology of childhood obesity.

    Jamie Stang;Katie A. Loth

  • Which Dieters Are at Risk for the Onset of Binge Eating? A Prospective Study of Adolescents and Young Adults

    Andrea B. Goldschmidt;Melanie Wall;Katie A. Loth;Daniel Le Grange

  • Are food restriction and pressure-to-eat parenting practices associated with adolescent disordered eating behaviors?

    Katie A. Loth;Richard F. MacLehose;Jayne A. Fulkerson;Scott Crow

Frequent Co-Authors

Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer University of Minnesota
Jerica M. Berge
Jerica M. Berge University of Minnesota
Marla E. Eisenberg
Marla E. Eisenberg University of Minnesota
Melanie M. Wall
Melanie M. Wall Columbia University
Jayne A. Fulkerson
Jayne A. Fulkerson University of Minnesota
Jennifer O. Fisher
Jennifer O. Fisher Temple University
Andrea B. Goldschmidt
Andrea B. Goldschmidt University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Scott J. Crow
Scott J. Crow University of Minnesota
Ann F. Haynos
Ann F. Haynos Virginia Commonwealth University
Michael H. Miner
Michael H. Miner University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a degree in psychology, it's worth exploring related online degrees and career pathways, such as social work. Many universities across the USA now offer flexible online programs designed for working adults and career changers.

Factors like tuition costs, program reputation, and graduate outcomes play a crucial role in choosing the right degree. Prospective students should look for high-value programs that balance affordability with strong academic quality.

For example, students in Iowa can review the most valuable online social work programs in Dubuque. Those interested in the Midwest have options through the best value online social work programs in Indiana and the best value online social work degrees in Kansas. Students on the East Coast can explore the best value online social work degrees in Maryland.

These resources can help you identify reputable programs, compare tuition, and discover rewarding career pathways that complement a psychology background, such as counseling, clinical social work, and community support roles.

Best Scientists Citing Katie A. Loth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles