World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4628 4284 2570 2324 232 10255

Alison L. Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alison L. Miller between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alison L. Miller published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2020. 38 of the 301 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2020. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 21 publications
1998 2025

301 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alison L. Miller: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 5
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 1
2008 1
2009 0
2010 1
2011 3
2012 5
2013 5
2014 12
2015 20
2016 21
2017 22
2018 30
2019 26
2020 35
2021 24
2022 21
2023 20
2024 17
2025 21
Total 301
Download as CSV

Alison L. Miller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison L. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 232 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 232
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alison L. Miller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison L. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alison L. Miller is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields of study with significant contributions to psychology, medicine, and social sciences. Within these broader areas, their work is particularly concentrated in clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, education, psychiatry and mental health, as well as sociology and political science.

The primary topics of Alison L. Miller's research include obesity, physical activity, and diet; child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development; child nutrition and feeding issues; eating disorders and behaviors; child abuse and trauma; child development and digital technology; and early childhood education and development.

Alison L. Miller has published extensively in several scientific outlets, with frequent contributions appearing in the following venues:

  • Appetite
  • PEDIATRICS
  • Pediatric Obesity
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • PLoS ONE

Recent papers emphasize a range of topics relevant to childhood development and public health, including:

  • Caregiver Influences on Eating Behaviors in Young Children, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Social distancing in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Longitudinal Associations Between Use of Mobile Devices for Calming and Emotional Reactivity and Executive Functioning in Children Aged 3 to 5 Years, 2022, JAMA Pediatrics
  • Neighborhood poverty predicts altered neural and behavioral response inhibition, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Emotion expression and regulation in three cultures: Chinese, Japanese, and American preschoolers' reactions to disappointment, 2020, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Collaborations have been a considerable part of their research output. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Niko Kaciroti
  • Julie C. Lumeng
  • Katherine L. Rosenblum
  • Hurley O. Riley
  • Leah E. Robinson

Best Publications

  • Adolescent Resilience: Promotive Factors That Inform Prevention

    Marc A. Zimmerman;Sarah A. Stoddard;Andria B. Eisman;Cleopatra H. Caldwell

  • Maternal mobile device use during a structured parent-child interaction task.

    Jenny Radesky;Alison L. Miller;Katherine L. Rosenblum;Danielle Appugliese

  • Sleep patterns and obesity in childhood.

    Alison L. Miller;Julie C. Lumeng;Monique K. LeBourgeois

  • Emotion Regulation in Context: The Jealousy Complex between Young Siblings and Its Relations with Child and Family Characteristics.

    Brenda L. Volling;Nancy L. McElwain;Alison L. Miller

  • Acute sleep restriction effects on emotion responses in 30- to 36-month-old children

    Rebecca H. Berger;Alison L. Miller;Ronald Seifer;Stephanie R. Cares

  • Ecological contexts and early learning: Contributions of child, family, and classroom factors during Head Start, to literacy and mathematics growth through first grade

    Annemarie H. Hindman;Lori E. Skibbe;Alison Miller;Marc Zimmerman

  • Showing and telling about emotions: Interrelations between facets of emotional competence and associations with classroom adjustment in Head Start preschoolers

    Alison L. Miller;Sarah E. Fine;Kathleen Kiely Gouley;Ronald Seifer

  • Maternal representations of the infant: associations with infant response to the still face.

    Katherine L. Rosenblum;Susan McDonough;Maria Muzik;Alison Miller

  • Development and validation of the Problematic Media Use Measure: A parent report measure of screen media “addiction” in children.

    Sarah E. Domoff;Kristen Harrison;Ashley N. Gearhardt;Douglas A. Gentile

  • Emotion Knowledge Skills in Low‐income Elementary School Children: Associations with Social Status and Peer Experiences

    Alison L. Miller;Kathleen Kiely Gouley;Ronald Seifer;Audrey Zakriski

  • Obesity-Associated Biomarkers and Executive Function in Children

    Alison L. Miller;Hannah J. Lee;Julie C. Lumeng

  • Observed Emotional and Behavioral Indicators of Motivation Predict School Readiness in Head Start Graduates.

    Amanda Berhenke;Alison L. Miller;Eleanor Brown;Ronald Seifer

  • Caregiver Influences on Eating Behaviors in Young Children: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Alexis C. Wood;Jacqueline M. Blissett;Jeffrey M. Brunstrom;Susan Carnell

  • Emotions and Behaviors in the Head Start Classroom: Associations Among Observed Dysregulation, Social Competence, and Preschool Adjustment

    Alison L. Miller;Kathleen Kiely Gouley;Ronald Seifer;Susan Dickstein

  • Emotional expressiveness during peer conflicts: a predictor of social maladjustment among high-risk preschoolers.

    Alison L. Miller;Sheryl L. Olson

  • Youth Empowerment Solutions: evaluation of an after-school program to engage middle school students in community change.

    Marc A. Zimmerman;Andria B. Eisman;Thomas M. Reischl;Susan Morrel-Samuels

  • Validation of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire in a low-income preschool-aged sample in the United States

    Sarah E. Domoff;Alison L. Miller;Niko Kaciroti;Julie C. Lumeng

  • Social distancing in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States.

    Nina B. Masters;Shu Fang Shih;Allen Bukoff;Kaitlyn B. Akel

  • Emotion Regulation in Context: Situational Effects on Infant and Caregiver Behavior

    Alison L. Miller;Susan C. McDonough;Katherine L. Rosenblum;Arnold J. Sameroff

  • Sibling Jealousy in a Triadic Context with Mothers and Fathers

    Alison L. Miller;Brenda L. Volling;Nancy L. McElwain

  • Mothers’ Empathic Understanding of their Toddlers: Associations with Maternal Depression and Sensitivity

    Lisa W. Coyne;Christine M. Low;Alison L. Miller;Ronald Seifer

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie C. Lumeng
Julie C. Lumeng University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Katherine L. Rosenblum
Katherine L. Rosenblum University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Karen E. Peterson
Karen E. Peterson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Marc A. Zimmerman
Marc A. Zimmerman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ashley N. Gearhardt
Ashley N. Gearhardt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ronald Seifer
Ronald Seifer Brown University
Kendrin R. Sonneville
Kendrin R. Sonneville University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Susan Dickstein
Susan Dickstein Brown University
Sheryl L. Olson
Sheryl L. Olson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Twila Tardif
Twila Tardif University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up numerous possibilities for both education and career advancement. Many universities offer flexible and accessible programs tailored for working professionals and remote learners. Prospective students can consider region-specific options, such as the California easiest psychology master's degree online, which provides convenient routes for state residents.

For those looking beyond the West Coast, resources like the easiest online psychology master's programs in Pennsylvania and the easiest online psychology programs in the Midwest offer insight into programs known for flexible requirements and accessible coursework.

Metropolitan areas often provide unique online opportunities as well. For example, prospective students in Texas can explore San Antonio psychology programs online to find local support and tailored tracks.

These varied options allow students to balance their studies with personal and professional commitments. Graduates find pathways into fields such as counseling, human services, research, and organizational psychology—with online programs providing the flexibility needed for today's diverse learners.

Best Scientists Citing Alison L. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles